Ministry of National Development (MND) responded today to Patrick Tan’s letter on the Straits Times Forum titled, ‘Four questions on DBSS‘.

Sophia Tsang responds to MND’s reply in her blog ‘SpeakSpokeWriteWrote‘, and she says:

Let’s see. This response at best skirts the issue.

1. Land sold by open tender. This means that HDB has a reserve price – which is likely to be the marked to market price as evaluated by Chief Valuer. Hence the bidding cannot be below this price. The logical conclusion is there is a “profit” which is going to be borne by the buyers.

2. DBSS is subsidized by the government via grants. Right – for those who qualify, the maximum grant is $40 000. Check it out here. Grants for DBSS. The net effect for the buyer is a discounted property at almost private property prices with HDB limitations. Not that the discount is that large considering the price tag.

3. Ms Lee went on to describe the developer’s strategy for bidding and pricing. Err Ms Lee – whatever land the developer bids for and builds on, he is subjected to the same risks. In the case of DBSS, he has two distinct advantages – cheaper land and good location. On top of that, with pent-up demand, this blank cheque accorded to the developers is bound to cost buyers.

4. HDB does not profit from the sales of the units. Sure – but HDB allows private developers to profit, and it would seem, in no small measure, from public housing. This is something that just does not sit right nor seem quite principled.

5. DBSS offers more options and is well appreciated by buyers. MND is reviewing DBSS housing options. If the former is true, why bother with the latter?

Ms Lee, if you hear the grouses properly, mere semantics will not soothe. The issue at hand is that HDB imposes rules and restrictions on buyers. For private developers, they are allowed to extract as much profit as they think they can. Double standards, no? Is it for the benefit of the buyer or is it to encourage a positive business environment?

Furthermore, couples are encouraged to stay near their parents. Many parents stay in mature estate. The land for HDB in such estates is limited. This particular development is way out of reach of most Singaporeans. Sayang! At a time where many are still waiting for a house, it still appears that in whatever area, money talks.

I am beginning to understand the correlation between dignity and pay.

PS: I just read that tampines centrale has now reduced the price by up to $102k. That means the profit is way above $102k per unit?


The original letter:

MND’s reply:

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Need for greater awareness, international attention on Rohingya issue: Maruah forum

By Howard Lee The plight of the Rohingya people extends way back…

Lawyer M Ravi to represent blogger in legal process

In continuation with the defamation lawsuit between Blogger Roy Ngerng Yi Ling…

【国会】2025年起 不再接受柴油驱动车和德士注册

交通部长王乙康今日(4日)在国会称,从2025年起,将停止接受柴油驱动的车辆和德士注册,并放眼2030年起,全国新注册的汽车和德士都属清洁能源驱动。 今日国会进行新加坡绿色发展蓝图辩论。为了鼓励电动车辆的使用,王乙康也宣布调整路税,功率较大的电动车同中小型电动车将缴纳同样的路税金额。 例如30到90千瓦以及90到230千瓦这两组电动车类别的路税,计算公式将统一,这意味着中型电动车车主缴交的路税,可减少最高34巴仙。 王乙康称,目前,本地所有车辆的废气排放量每年达到约640万吨。他认为,若轻型车辆都改成电动车,排放量至少能减少150至200万吨,占我国总排放量约四巴仙。 另一方面,王乙康放眼本地八个市镇的所有组屋停车场,在2025年将具备电动车充电设备。这八个市镇是:勿洛、蔡厝港、宏茂桥、榜鹅、女皇镇、三巴旺、登加和裕廊西。 陆路交通管理局有计划扩大计划,预计2030年到2040年间,逐步让所有市镇的停车场都设有电动车充电站。

Tan Jee Say : Why I want to be President

The following is a press statement from Tan Jee Say: In summary…