In continuation with the defamation lawsuit between Blogger Roy Ngerng Yi Ling and Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong. Lawyer M Ravi has confirmed with the law firm, Drew & Napier representing PM Lee that he will be accepting the service of process on behalf of Ngerng.
Just yesterday, a letter was sent from PM Lee saying that the apology given by Ngerng was completely insincere and was designed to mislead PM Lee and the public.
The letter further added that despite Ngerng giving his word to remove the offending posts and video as requested by PM Lee, he continued to make it available to a select group of people and send out the emails to a wide audience, including the local and international media where he republished the video and offending posts. The senior counsel said Ngerng has himself to blame for losing the opportunity of not having to pay aggravated damages and asked if M Ravi would be accepting the service of process on behalf of his client.
The demand for the 4 articles and video to be taken down was made in a letter sent on the 26th May. The letter wrote,

“If your client immediately removes them (the 4 articles and 1 video) and undertakes in writing through you by 5pm today that he will not further aggravate the injury and distress to our client through similar other posts, videos or other  means, our client will, provided that the posts and videos are not republished and the undertaking is honoured, be prepared not to claim any aggravated damages form your client.”

M Ravi wrote in his reply that the wording of “similar other posts” in the letter sent on 26th May should not curtail the Ngerng’s right to his freedom of expression to write or engage the public on the CPF issue and raise any matters relation to CPF. Any attempt of doing so would be frowned upon by Article 14 of the Singapore’s constitution.
M Ravi also confirms in the letter that he has instructions to accept service of process on behalf of Roy Ngerng.
 
Attached below is the letter sent by M Ravi to PM Lee.

Letter to Drew and Napier 28.05.14

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

前艺人黄奕良涉持械打客工 反指遭执法人员无礼对待

新传媒前艺人黄奕良,涉嫌持械殴打客工的头部和腹部,案件昨日(7月27日)开审,他在庭上自行抗辩,并指事发后执法人员并没有给予他解释机会,还把他当狗一般使唤对待。 依据控状,经营装修公司的黄奕良(59岁)于2018年12月11日下午4时20分,在新加坡回教综合大厦(Singapore Islamic Hub)的食堂,持着刮刀打伤所雇佣的客工贾希都(Jahidul)。他因此面对两项控状,即持武器蓄意伤人罪和滋事打架罪状。 指控受害人只是在演戏 昨日在国家法院,控方就持武器蓄意伤人罪开审,被告选择自行抗辩,并且不认罪,更指客工只是在演戏,自己才是被陷害的。而下午在法庭上,被告则表示,抵达现场调查的高级调查员对他非常“不客气”,且到了案发隔日才能够做出解释。 基于受害人目前入住被隔离的客工宿舍,因此这两日都无法出庭供证。 控方在昨日传召了三名证人,分别是事发现场的报案阿克达尔,以及两名到场调查的警员张耀文和林荣豪。 保安表示,事发时他接获大厦内发生打斗事件的投报,于是到事发地点了解情况,却见受害者向他哭诉遭上司(即被告)殴打。受害者还向他展示头部、腹部和手肘的伤处,他立刻拍下照片取证。 保安表示,受害者透露遭上司辱骂愚笨等,而被告当时忽然介入,并大声说话。他表示已经不记得被告说什么了,但是劝请后者离开。 被告在被询问时否认辱骂受害者,反指受害者就是在“做戏”,并模仿受害者的举动。“他伤势没这么严重,但是表现出来的伤痛程度却增加了百倍,表演成分很高,你记得吗?” 他指出,整个过程中,受害者根本就是在陷害他。…

National Youth Council partners Redd+E to engage youth purposefully through esports

Earlier this week, the National Youth Council (NYC) forged a partnership with…

TOC Exclusive interview with CHC members

by Gordon Lee TOC sat down with 4 members of City Harvest…

SPF comments on riot at Little India

Police Statement made on Singapore Police Force’s facebook page at 1 am,…