Thai fishermen give supplies to migrants on a boat drifting 17km (10 miles) off the coast of Koh Lipe(Reuters)

Maruah Rohingya forum p2

By Howard Lee

The plight of the Rohingya people extends way back beyond Myanmar’s current domestic political issues, and attention needs to be paid on their rights as citizens of Myanmar.

This point, together with a historical perspective of the Rohingya, was shared and discussed at a forum held last Saturday, 6 June, hosted by Singapore human rights group Maruah in partnership with the Humanitarian Organization for Migrant Economics and The Opinion Collaborative.

Maruah’s president Ms Braema Mathi presented a background on the Rohingya and Rakhine state to a group of participants consisting of Singaporeans and Burmese, before hosting an open discussion.

Maruah Rohingya forum p1
Maruah’s president Braema Mathi.

Participants contributed their views and unique perspectives on the Rohingya, including insights on racial-religious relations between various ethnic groups in Rakhine in specific and Myanmar in general.

Participants learnt that the religious unrest was fairly unique to Rakhine, as Muslims and Buddhist co-existed peacefully in other parts of Myanmar. This suggested that there could be political agitators that have increased sectarian unrest in Rakhine.

It was also shared that the unrest in Rakhine had actually been taking place for decades, and only came to international attention due to the boat refugees who sought asylum on the shores of neighbouring countries.

It was also pointed out that the current position of the Myanmar government calling the Rohingya “illegal immigrants” is incorrect, as the Rohingya has actually existed in Myanmar for centuries, with their own language and culture, and are rightfully Burmese by nationality.

Participants also discussed how the current efforts by the Myanmar government to offer the Rohingya official citizenship might take longer than it needs to ensure their survival, given the coming elections and the need for political parties to appease the Buddhist majority.

To that effect, it was suggested that the international community might need to press harder for the Myanmar government to improve the speed and transparency in the citizenship process.

Thai fishermen give supplies to migrants on a boat drifting 17km (10 miles) off the coast of Koh Lipe(Reuters)
Thai fishermen give supplies to migrants on a boat drifting 17km (10 miles) off the coast of Koh Lipe(Reuters)

Editor’s note: The term “Burmese” has been used in this article, as there is currently no stated consensus on whether the people of Myanmar should be called “Burmese” or “Myanmarese”. The spoken language of many in Myanmar is still called “Burmese”.

Subscribe
Notify of
3 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Court lengthens suspension of M’sian doctor found negligent and with “blatant lack of remorse”

The Court of Appeal on Wednesday (Mar 6) increased the term of…

经两日朝野激辩 72票赞成9票反对 国会通过《防假消息法》

经过两天的激辩,国会在昨日晚上10时20分结束前,以72票赞成,九票反对,三票弃权,三读通过《防止网络假信息和防止网络操纵法案》。 人民行动党72议员投下赞成票,工人党的六名议员:毕丹星、林瑞莲、刘程强、方荣发、陈硕茂和费沙,三名非选区议员:贝理安、吴佩松和陈立峰则投下反对票。 至于先前一再呼吁《防假消息法》需进行修改的三名官委议员:特斯拉副教授、王丽婷和郭秀钦,则在他们对法案修改的建议未被采纳后,在三读时投弃权票。 多位议员在两日的辩论,相续对《防假消息法》提出观点,其中也包括质疑何以新法赋予部长取缔假信息的权力,以及为何绕过司法审讯,由部长先行裁决假消息并采取行动。 在进行辩论总结时,尚穆根则强调假消息可能在短时间内迅速传播,威胁社会安全或引起经济动荡。 至于授权不同部长的原因是,一些假消息课题可能涉及不同部门或专业领域,为此让有关部门部长直接作出决定。他们也必须为他们的决定面对挑战和质疑。 回应刘程强“先斩后奏” :“头没断,手还在” 有议员建议将假信息的取缔权交给第三方,尚穆根表示,这么做是将政府应对假信息后果的职责,以及取缔假信息的权力分割开来,会削弱执行效率。 昨日刘程强以“先斩后奏”,比喻法案赋予部长的先行独断权,尚穆根则回应,即便部长发出更正指示,发帖者原文都还在“头没断,手还在”,还能继续用键盘打字、也能作出上诉。 刘程强则回应,假设部长认为某涉事者涉传播假消息,部长可直接做决定,可以发出更正或撤下文章的指示,部长已经先行做决定,为何不算“先斩后奏”? “涉事者虽然之后可以到法庭申诉,但事实就是,他得先遵从部长的命令。”…

警方:未拖延审批新加坡前进党活动准证

昨日,新加坡前进党创党人陈清木透过脸书告知支持者,该党原定于本月15日举行的正式推介仪式将展延;不过警方则在昨日稍迟时表示,不会拖延发放给该党必要的准证。 《今日报》报导指,警方在答复媒体询问时表示,警方也积极与新加坡前进党接洽沟通,以便准证能在预定日期前发放,不过该党在未通知警方的情况下,宣布展延活动。 警方称,该党也有意在活动上播放音乐和视频,因此也必须取得相关的公共娱乐执照(PEL),而且还要把将在活动播放的影片,交给资讯通信媒体发展局(IMDA)以作分类。 “要在公众场所播放影片,这是标准要求。” 警方澄清,该党主席Wang Swee Chuang是在上月3日申请警方准证,警方也询问后者提供上述资讯,四天后警方还有再次提醒他。 警方再次于5月27日提醒Wang Swee Chuang“必须申请公共娱乐执照,以及把影片交给资媒局”,后者才申请有关执照。 上述执照需12个工作日审批。至于资媒局还通过电邮和电话联系Wang主席,请他提交影片,不过后者并没这么做。

Of transparency, investigation and media

Howard Lee / You would have heard it by now. The recent…