Ravi Philemon /

I said on my Facebook page a few days ago that “I am one of the many Singaporeans who urged him (Dr Tan Cheng Bock) to stand for the upcoming Presidential Election.”

I think that it is important to say why I support Dr Tan’s bid for the elected presidency.

Let me start by saying that I am not very young (neither am I that old), so I have followed Dr Tan’s work as a backbencher in Parliament and he has always struck me as an MP who speaks from his heart.

For example, in 1988, Dr Tan who then headed the Government Parliamentary Committee for Education, suggested that the government consider extending CPF’s Extended Investment scheme to include education. He argued that education should be considered an investment in human resources which would result in a better educated, better skilled and better quality workforce.

Then Minister for Labour, Dr Lee Yock Suan, opposed it because he feared that CPF savings of members may be squandered in expensive studies at unknown foreign universities. The then MP for Kebun Baru, Mr Lim Boon Heng, objected to Dr Tan’s proposal on the basis that it was a populist move.

Dr Tan rebutted Mr Lim then by saying, “The MP for Kebun Baru called this a popular move, a popular issue.  Is it because you think it is popular, you think it is wrong to bring it up? Or are popular decisions wrong decisions?”

Dr Tan also spoke up against Singapore hospitals becoming more profit-oriented.  This he believes will alter the practice of medicine and the values of some doctors, leaving the door open to abuse. Noting that the 1993 White Paper on Affordable Health Care used the term ‘industry’ to describe medicine, Dr Tan lamented, “Medicine is (now) treated less as a profession and more as an industry.”

In 2005, during the re-emergence of dengue in Singapore, Dr Tan spoke up against the shortage of hospital beds.  He said, “If you say you have no choice but to turn away patients because of lack of beds and other resources, you haven’t planned enough.”

In 1993, when the government of Singapore, went on an overdrive on upgrading, Dr Tan urged restraint in basic areas like housing, education and health.  The government, he said, must continue to provide three-room apartments and ensure that there are sufficient ‘C’ class and ‘B2’ beds in public hospitals.

As far back as 1999, Dr Tan highlighted the growing resentment of Singaporeans towards ‘foreign talent’ in Parliament.  He urged the Government to tone down its insistence on the value of attracting foreign talent, “in order to protect our citizens and give them a better chance”.

In July 2002, when the Minister for Transport decided to hike public transportation fares, Dr Tan was one of the few in Parliament who urged a review of the price hike.

Yes, in 1987 Dr Tan seemed to have supported the detention of the alleged ‘Marxist conspirators’, but I believe that like most Singaporeans (including me) at that time, he believed the misinformation that was fed to him by the government of Singapore.  But what’s notable is that even then, Dr Tan did not brush aside those that detracted from his views (and the views of most Singaporeans at that time) by labelling them ‘Marxist sympathisers’, but instead acknowledged them as “solid citizens”.

More importantly, I urged Dr Tan to consider standing for the Presidential Election and intend to support him in his bid because as MP Inderjit Singh rightly said, “For Presidential Elections, there’s always been a candidate that the Government supports … it’s quite clear that we will be fully behind this person so it will be very awkward (to have Dr Tan in the contest).” This makes it even more important for ordinary Singaporeans like me to support Dr Tan in the contest.

In a culture where it is natural for any backbencher not to criticise the policies of their bosses aggressively (perhaps with an eye on the front bench and their own career path), Dr Tan is a rarity. His ears are on the ground, he is intellectual, he speaks his mind and he has won the respect of many Singaporeans.

The late President Ong Teng Cheong said in an interview, “Even in my last year as president, I was still not being informed about some ministerial procedures.”  I hope that Dr Tan, if elected, will finish this unfinished job of President Ong.

Why I support Dr Tan’s bid to be the Elected President of Singapore is because I believe what Dr Tan recently said, that he will be a “unifying figure for all Singaporeans of whatever political affiliation, race or religion.”

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

人间有爱!两女摆摊让有需要居民领取食物

两名女子在疫情期间,为勿洛居民设立临时公共茶水间,让有需要者能够领取食物礼包。 两名女子为43岁活动策划师叶秀菁,和43岁主妇吴女士,两人在本月8日,于勿洛南一带的路旁设立临时茶水间(Pop-up Pantry),除了让居民捐赠食物,也让有需要者能够领取。 叶秀菁表示,她和吴女士俩人是小学同学,在阻断措施期间就萌生这样的想法,但碍于当时的情况无法付诸现实,因此在解封后,趁着国庆日前夕,将想法付诸行动。 她坦言,先向身边的朋友募捐,获得亲友的支持后,开始物色地点。在物色地点期间也费了一些心思,希望能达到既能让人捐赠食品,又可以方便有需要的人领取食物,于是选择了勿洛南一带的路旁。 “不过,我们后来发现捐的人多,领的人少,地点并不是最理想,因此转换场地,改到勿洛南第46座组屋附近‘摆摊’。” 消息一出后,也引发许多网友关注,截至目前已经获得逾1千次赞和转载,两人也紧接着设立脸书专页分享最新消息,并于今日早上在勿洛南第46座组屋附近开始摆摊。 许多人也开始响应这项活动,根据脸书专页表示,今日的食品都能够被领走,有些食品甚至需要补货,也有很多人向前给他们鼓励。  

Malaysia: Mass arrest of peaceful protesters shows shrinking space for human rights defenders

Amnesty International Press Release  31st October 2013 – Today’s arrest of 19 people involved…

【冠状病毒19】斯里兰卡籍男囚 刑满待遣返时确诊

卫生发布在本月3日公布,一名持短期探访准证(Short-Term Visit Pass)的斯里兰卡籍囚犯确诊。 移民与关卡局和监狱署则补充资讯,这名囚犯是在1月2日抵达新加坡,但在6月30日,因逾期逗留被捕。7月6日,被判监禁四周。 与其他新囚犯一样,上述男子入狱前同样需隔离14天和接受检测,结果呈阴性。 7月8日,男子感染骨痛热症,到樟宜综合医院时还有再接受冠病检测,结果呈阴性。他在13日就回到樟宜监狱中心、22日检测,结果仍是阴性,这期间仍是与其他囚犯隔离开来。 男子刑满后在27日移交移民关卡局关押,准备遣返。28日,他到邱德拔医院复诊。 由于目前未有往斯里兰卡航班,7月30日这名男囚又被送回监狱署。不过他在接受拭子检测时才发现确诊。 一名监狱署官员、五名移民局官员和五名辅警,因曾接触这名男囚,需遵守隔离令。

China’s festival of cruelty

“What I saw was a city in preparation for the annual massacre,”…