Andrew Loh

People’s Action Party (PAP) Member of Parliament for Nee Soon GRC, Dr Lim Wee Kiak has apologised and withdrawn the remarks he made about ministerial salaries. Dr Lim was reported by the Chinese press last week as having said:

“If the annual salary of the Minister of Information, Communication and Arts is only $500,000, it may pose some problems when he discuss policies with media CEOs who earn millions of dollars because they need not listen to the minister’s ideas and proposals, hence a reasonable payout will help to maintain a bit of dignity.”

His comments drew swift and angry response online with many castigating and criticising him.

On Friday Dr Lim apologised for the remarks in a posting he made on his Facebook page. The posting, titled ”
Clarification, apology and withdrawal of my quote“, is as follows:

Minister’s pay is a sensitive issue and is one that many are concerned about. I would like to clarify my comments made to Lianhe Zaobao and also reproduced in LianheWanBao

I made three fundamental points.

1. We need a balanced approach to the question of Ministerial pay.

2. Personally, I think we should not use pay and perks to attract capable people to come forward to serve. I agree with PM that there is a service to country element and an element of sacrifice expected for the Ministers by the public.

3. On the other hand, we need to take into consideration their responsibilities and job scope when we remunerate Ministers.

On further reflection, I agree that the example I quoted regarding a MICA minister meeting the heads of telcos and saying that there may be some loss of face if the minister’s salary is low is inappropriate and incorrect. I withdraw those remarks and apologise for making them. Dignity cannot be and must not be measured purely in monetary terms.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
9 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Assistance for elderly and poor – whither our priorities?

by Andrew Loh Reading the Lianhe Zaobao article on Dr Lily Neo…

India’s External Affairs Minister: SG and India are “solid partners” and Delhi Chief Minister doesn’t speak for India

It was reported that the Ministry of Health (MOH) issued a statement…

Whose future is “shining”, really?

Ministers to get a 3rd pay hike. What about the elderly?

扬言调查录音泄露事件 中华总商会会长亦参与人协基层工作

本月10日,贸工部长陈振声出席新加坡中华总商会(SCCCI)的一项闭门对话会。不料会议上的谈话内容被录音,音频在网络疯传。 音频中可听见陈振声,以新加坡式英语向与会者解说政府处理口罩问题面对的难处,期间更揶揄一小撮国人到超市疯抢日用品囤货、抢购口罩的行为“下衰”,认为是“白痴”(idiots)行径。 对于谈话内容泄露,新加坡中华总商会黄山忠也发表文告,谴责泄露音频者的行为,也认为此举使商会声誉遭损,以及伤害了商会与陈振声部长多年来建立的信任。 不过对于商会会长的回应,人权律师张素兰反倒有不同看法,她在脸书发文浅谈此事,希望“给商会会长一些安慰”,认为后者不必对录音泄露一事感到担忧,因为私人会议上录音政府也常做,该会会员在会上录音的行为,并不可耻。 张素兰:本来无良誉 何惧损毁? 但张素兰话锋一转,又指不必对该会成员行为可能拉低商会声誉一事,感到遗憾。“您和商会可能对贵会的“崇高声誉”过于自负。对我而言,贵会对于普通老百姓无所建树。实则贵会只对有钱有势者阿谀奉承。” 她反倒建议黄山忠不必去调查到底是谁泄露陈振声的谈话内容,“就我所知贵会也没有声誉。而且我知道,群众根本不在乎。” 她回溯2015年,他代表功能八号氏族会,为陈嘉庚的外孙傅树介医生的著作《活在欺瞒年代》,租用陈嘉庚礼堂办推介活动。她付了抵押金;但数日后被告知,理事不让租用,且没告知理由。 后来傅树介在推介礼上曾提起,身为陈嘉庚外孙,却不能租用以外公命名的礼堂,推介自己的回忆录向老人家致敬,对此他感到遗憾。“对我而言,这是一个病危社会的征兆。” 黄山忠任大巴窑中公民咨询委会主席 事实上,除了领导新加坡中华总商会,黄山忠本身是达丰控股董事经理兼首席执行官。…