The following is an excerpt from an article published in Yawning Bread

Alex Au

Singapore is not uniformly majority Chinese with Indians and Malays as the other two significant minority groups. Depending on where and when you look, you can get a different mix. Most of the time, it is of little significance, but sometimes there is reason to ask if more underlies what we see.

Peter Lloyd made an observation in his book Inside Story, based on his experience spending time in Singapore’s prison system. Three in four inmates, he wrote, were Malays and Indians. Behind bars, the Chinese were a minority. Undeniably, his observation was not broad data-based, but drawn from what he could see around him when he himself was a prisoner. On the other hand, the Singapore public doesn’t get much data either; the Prison Service’s website (www.prisons.gov.sg) provides no statistics. There is no easy way I can disprove him.

Lloyd, a well-known correspondent for the Australian Broadcasting Corporation with a track record covering the October 2002 Bali bombing and the attempted assassination of Benazir Bhutto in October 2007, was arrested in Singapore in July 2008 and subsequently sentenced to eight months’ imprisonment for possession (of 0.51 grams) and consumption of methamphetamine (Page 75). With time-off for good behaviour, he served five and a half months in Tanah Merah gaol.

His data sample was not large. At any given time, he mixed around with only a few other inmates. Singapore’s prison system, for example, does not have large mess halls. In the interest of security, prisoners are confined to smallish groups called “landings” — I suppose it means the group of prisoners who share the same cluster of cells and exercise yard. Nonetheless, over the months, as prisoners were released and new ones came in, he might have seen a fair number. Furthermore, he met others when he was (twice) in Queenstown Remand Prison in the initial stages, and for a few weeks at Tanah Merah, he conducted several sessions with inmates from other parts of the prison on anger management.

In his book, this observation is a springboard for some ranting about how the Chinese in Singapore lord over the other races, supported by a few juicy quotes he attributes to non-Chinese prison officers themselves. But this should not distract from the nagging questions his observations pose. Is it true that Malays and Indians are a disproportionate number of inmates in our prison system? Does that indicate bias in sentencing? Alternatively, in the absence of bias, does that indicate that Malays and Indians are becoming a permanent underclass.

To read on, click here.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

AWARE:受害者反映对防性骚扰海报感不舒服

上周,妇女行动及研究协会(AWARE)对最新的防性骚扰犯罪海报表达看法,质疑将性暴力“明码标价”的意义,也认为海报没有考虑到受害人承受的创伤和痛苦。 “为什么我们必须在性暴力上“标价”,并判断它的价值?是否判刑一年,就显得比较“值得“?还是六个月?这对造成伤害的人又值多少?我们迫切需要改变对性暴力的讨论与界定。” 对此,新加坡警方也很快作出回应,表示设计理念是希望通过强烈的视觉效果,强调犯罪后果的严重性,以对潜在犯罪者起到威吓的作用,也指AWARE未事先咨询警方,且不理解设计理念。 针对警方回应,AWARE 于周日(17日)则回应,性暴力是社会中存在的问题,而作为性别平等倡导团体,AWARE 有责任教育公众如何看待性暴力问题。 AWARE 澄清公开评论并非针对警察部队,同时也支持警察试图传达的威吓信息,认可比起过去一些海报,将责任推卸到受害者身上,有着重大的进步。 然而他们忧心的是,新海报为罪行“标价”,以及犯罪者在海报内以手触摸女性部位的视觉效果。 “将价格与受害者比喻为商店货架上物品,仿佛只要犯罪者愿意支付该“价格”,便可实行犯罪行为。海报内并未明确说明犯罪行为是错误的,只是提到“代价不便宜”。使用这样的方法去宣传防犯行为,忽略掉受害者的经历,以及公众对受害者的同理心。” 有受害者反映对海报感不舒服 AWARE…

Dr Paul Tambyah: 14-day quarantine period for Covid-19 is still appropriate as long incubation period is rare

Singapore’s implementation of a 14-day quarantine period is still an appropriate measure,…

More than 200 applications for SAF Volunteer Corps

Defence Minister Ng Eng Hen revealed that more than 200 applications have…

Tony Tan: one man who cannot be overlooked

by: Ravi Philemon/ picture: Shawn Danker/ There are many reasons out there…