The Reform Party (RP) announced on 10 February 2011 the addition of a new member, Mr Gilbert Goh. TOC catches up with Mr Goh to find out more about his decision to enter politics and his plans moving forward.

by Deborah Choo

Mr Gilbert Goh

When was the first time you voted?

At the age of 34, I think, when I was staying in Pasir Ris. I just got married then.

When did you first come to know of the opposition parties in Singapore?

I knew about them when I was young i.e. around 20s. Nevertheless, I have been a loyal PAP supporter till 2000/2001 when I was jobless for 1.5 years. I didn’t know where to seek help and when I approached the CDC/CDAC, there wasn’t much that was on the table to help the jobless then.

I also had a bad opinion as the opposition parties were rather messy and inefficient then.

Were you actively voting for the past few elections?

I believe that I must have voted at least thrice for Singapore’s elections. I was fortunate as I heard that many people didn’t have the chance to vote at all.

Why did you decide to join a political party this time round and not the previous elections or the one before that? i.e. what’s the significance of this election to you?

I believe that it was a progressive evolvement for me; I started to write to the papers about issues that mattered to my heart, started my own blogs, contributed articles to TOC/TR and finally decided to stand for election if given the opportunity. It was not a sudden snap decision but that the things I did the past few years eventually led me to that decision.

This election is also a bit different from the rest as now we are besieged with the huge influx of foreigners and many middle aged PMETs are jobless. We are also a bit clueless as to what to do with the economy this time round and many people generally suffer from policies that affect their re-employment opportunities and average wages.

What made you finally decide to go into politics? i.e. Was it something you always wanted to do, or a recent decision?

As mentioned above, I think that it was not a snap decision but something that gradually took hold of me.  It’s like I did certain things along the way, and the eventual decision to join politics were a natural progression.

If you asked me if I would stand for elections in 2006 – not a chance!

Do you think your past experience running transitioning.org and being unemployed prepared and/or led you to eventually participate in political parties?

There is a certain amount of influence politically while running transitioning.org as I received quite a lot of emails from the jobless community. You can say that I have first hand ground reaction to what’s happening to our unemployed PMETs. I was naturally disturbed by the fact that certain polices are harming the employment opportunities of our local workers e.g. the influx of foreigner workers, lax labour laws and no minimum wage policy. I realized that the public does need a voice to speak out for them. If I don’t stand up, I feel that I would have done them injustice as I have so much insider knowledge of what’s happening to them.

Of all political parties in Singapore, why did you choose the Reform Party (RP)?

I chose Reform Party because it has a mandate of wanting to form the next government – it is very different from other political parties here. I believe that Singaporeans want a party that is brave enough to offer Singaporeans an alternative government. I know that it is a bold mandate but it is something that is necessary.

Did you approach or speak to any other political parties before finally settling on RP? If yes, which political parties / who in particular did you speak to?

I have spoken to National Solidarity Party (NSP) led by Mr Goh Meng Seng before deciding on RP.

In your opinion, what makes RP different from the rest of the political parties?

RP has a unique mandate of wanting a change in governance plus it has a solid youth political movement. I believe that the youth will want to go for a change from the current regime.

Going forward, what do you hope to achieve as a member of RP?

I hope to contribute my ground experience to RP especially in the area of working with the unemployed community.

Are you intending to run for the upcoming elections? If so, tell us more about your campaign proposal and plans you’re thinking about at the moment e.g. what issue are you going to breach to the public?

I will leave the decision to field me as a candidate to my party’s Secretary-General Mr Kenneth Jeyaretnam. I can’t comment on your follow-up question as I have yet to sit down with the party and run through the campaign proposal with them.

What is your view on the PAP or the YPAP for that matter?

I believe that the PAP is not really in touch with the ground the past few years. The foreigners’ issue is a thorny one and I personally believe that this will hurt their election campaign a lot. Many unemployed or under employed middle-aged PMETs will be likely switch their votes to the opposition.  Younger voters will also not hesitate to cast their votes for the opposition as they feel that the PAP is not really listening to them.

I have no comment on the YPAP as I don’t really know much about them.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

失望未捍卫会员权益 传部分巴士司机退出全国交工联

去年9月,五名巴士司机分别状告本地巴士业者新捷运(SBS Transit),指责后者违反加班工酬条款,支付不足工酬。 新捷运把诉讼移交工业仲裁庭(IAC)审理。该庭法官陈成安在去年11月13日则裁决,新捷运未抵触雇佣法。 上月16日,律师拉维(M Ravi)代表八名巴士司机,向高庭提出司法复核,以撤销工业仲裁庭的裁决。 心灰意冷? 这些司机认为工业仲裁庭的裁决“不合理”,仅基于新捷运提供的雇员合约和值日表样本,就作出单方面的决定,“并没有把那些原告司机们的合约和值日表纳入考量。” 本社探悉,上述诉讼也在公共巴士司机群体内引起轩然大波,甚至有者认为,全国交通工友联合会(NTWU)并没有捍卫会员权益,而退出该会。 近日本社也探访几位在不同巴士转换站的司机,了解他们退出工会的缘由,而大多反映,工会并没有协助他们处理问题或投诉。 “司机无助,缴会费如同白费” 其中一名已在新捷运工作六年的司机表示,每每他们反映问题或投诉,交工联根本没来解决问题,这致使他质疑缴会员费的价值。 “如果我们得不到工会任何帮助,缴九块钱会员费也是白费。”且即便没有工会,司机们也是如常工作,影响不大。…

陈清木圣诞前送温暖 访清寒家庭赠必需品

履行社会责任,圣诞前夕送温暖,新加坡前进党秘书长陈清木医生,在上周六(21日)偕同该党党员和志愿者,拜访清寒家庭并赠送生活必需品,让他们也能拥有一个丰富喜乐的圣诞和跨年夜。 不少前进党志工都乘着周末休假之便,抽空参与此善举。陈清木医生在脸书贴文分享,志工们拜访了金文泰、裕廊和文礼一带的清寒家庭。 陈清木也挨家逐户拜访这些家庭,其中不乏年长者和不良于行的障友。 许多网民和支持者也在脸书赞扬陈清木等人的善举,并留言祝福圣诞和新年快乐。 陈清木对于扶贫的立场 对于扶助国内清寒或较不幸群体,陈清木曾公开表示,尽管政府出台许多政策扶助贫穷群体,但眼下仍迫切做得更多。 今年9月10日,前进党举办《新加坡贫穷,社会安全网政策鸿沟》讲座,陈清木赞扬新加坡政府投资公司(GIC)前首席经济师杨南强,道出一个现实:许多国民即便只是要满足基本需求,也显得捉襟见肘。 “国人非常关注这问题,而杨南强先生则梳理这些问题的根源、范畴,以及一些迫切需要采用的政策解决方案。” 在上述讲座,曾担任国大李光耀公共政策研究所兼职教授的杨南强,也透露早在2007年,他就已展开跨部门调查探讨新加坡贫穷问题,“令我震惊和恐惧的是,我发现本土的贫穷状况,远比我想象的更糟糕。”

落实防疫措施所限 国会放弃“刷脸”记录议员出席率

回溯两年前,国会秘书处进行公开招标,寻求“刷脸点名”系统的设置,以便国会能“靠脸”实时记录议员的出席率。 根据招标书,国会进行时,刷脸点名系统将协助秘书处实时点名、确定有多少名议员在场,并确定议员的身份。 不过国会秘书处今日(20日)却告知《海峡时报》,考量到当前疫情和现有科技发展,“刷脸点名”系统已取消。 国会秘书处提及,国会目前已落实了防疫措施,且议员的议席也有更动,包括部份被安排坐到旁观席以保持社交距离,这些都影响了可以架设的刷脸识别系统的数量。 为此,当初招标的规格已不符合现有的需求。 之前的招标是计划安置六个不显眼的摄像机,且系统能生成可输出和打印的报告,显示在场或缺席的议员人数,以及议员的名字,并在指定时间内可查看某议员何时缺席和缺席几次。 当述入资料时,比如议员名字等就能查找相关的出席率,而且能永久保存数据资料。系统启用前,业者必须先为100名议员(包括官委议员和非选区议员)的脸部存档。 目前的做法,都是由国会职员来手动记录和观察议员的出席,不过,职员未跟进究竟每个议员在国会议事庭里坐了多久。 根据新加坡宪法,依照议事常规要通过任何修法,国会里至少要有四分之一国会议员(出去议长、副议长或主持会议议员)列席。 目前,国会有93名当选议员以及两名非选区议员,以及九名官委议员将在下月宣誓就职。

Gov’t focused on getting commuters to use public transport: Lui

The Minister of Transport, Lui Tuck Yew, says the Government is focused…