Connect with us

Current Affairs

TOC speaks to RP’s newest member

Published

on

The Reform Party (RP) announced on 10 February 2011 the addition of a new member, Mr Gilbert Goh. TOC catches up with Mr Goh to find out more about his decision to enter politics and his plans moving forward.

by Deborah Choo

Mr Gilbert Goh

When was the first time you voted?

At the age of 34, I think, when I was staying in Pasir Ris. I just got married then.

When did you first come to know of the opposition parties in Singapore?

I knew about them when I was young i.e. around 20s. Nevertheless, I have been a loyal PAP supporter till 2000/2001 when I was jobless for 1.5 years. I didn’t know where to seek help and when I approached the CDC/CDAC, there wasn’t much that was on the table to help the jobless then.

I also had a bad opinion as the opposition parties were rather messy and inefficient then.

Were you actively voting for the past few elections?

I believe that I must have voted at least thrice for Singapore’s elections. I was fortunate as I heard that many people didn’t have the chance to vote at all.

Why did you decide to join a political party this time round and not the previous elections or the one before that? i.e. what’s the significance of this election to you?

I believe that it was a progressive evolvement for me; I started to write to the papers about issues that mattered to my heart, started my own blogs, contributed articles to TOC/TR and finally decided to stand for election if given the opportunity. It was not a sudden snap decision but that the things I did the past few years eventually led me to that decision.

This election is also a bit different from the rest as now we are besieged with the huge influx of foreigners and many middle aged PMETs are jobless. We are also a bit clueless as to what to do with the economy this time round and many people generally suffer from policies that affect their re-employment opportunities and average wages.

What made you finally decide to go into politics? i.e. Was it something you always wanted to do, or a recent decision?

As mentioned above, I think that it was not a snap decision but something that gradually took hold of me.  It’s like I did certain things along the way, and the eventual decision to join politics were a natural progression.

If you asked me if I would stand for elections in 2006 – not a chance!

Do you think your past experience running transitioning.org and being unemployed prepared and/or led you to eventually participate in political parties?

There is a certain amount of influence politically while running transitioning.org as I received quite a lot of emails from the jobless community. You can say that I have first hand ground reaction to what’s happening to our unemployed PMETs. I was naturally disturbed by the fact that certain polices are harming the employment opportunities of our local workers e.g. the influx of foreigner workers, lax labour laws and no minimum wage policy. I realized that the public does need a voice to speak out for them. If I don’t stand up, I feel that I would have done them injustice as I have so much insider knowledge of what’s happening to them.

Of all political parties in Singapore, why did you choose the Reform Party (RP)?

I chose Reform Party because it has a mandate of wanting to form the next government – it is very different from other political parties here. I believe that Singaporeans want a party that is brave enough to offer Singaporeans an alternative government. I know that it is a bold mandate but it is something that is necessary.

Did you approach or speak to any other political parties before finally settling on RP? If yes, which political parties / who in particular did you speak to?

I have spoken to National Solidarity Party (NSP) led by Mr Goh Meng Seng before deciding on RP.

In your opinion, what makes RP different from the rest of the political parties?

RP has a unique mandate of wanting a change in governance plus it has a solid youth political movement. I believe that the youth will want to go for a change from the current regime.

Going forward, what do you hope to achieve as a member of RP?

I hope to contribute my ground experience to RP especially in the area of working with the unemployed community.

Are you intending to run for the upcoming elections? If so, tell us more about your campaign proposal and plans you’re thinking about at the moment e.g. what issue are you going to breach to the public?

I will leave the decision to field me as a candidate to my party’s Secretary-General Mr Kenneth Jeyaretnam. I can’t comment on your follow-up question as I have yet to sit down with the party and run through the campaign proposal with them.

What is your view on the PAP or the YPAP for that matter?

I believe that the PAP is not really in touch with the ground the past few years. The foreigners’ issue is a thorny one and I personally believe that this will hurt their election campaign a lot. Many unemployed or under employed middle-aged PMETs will be likely switch their votes to the opposition.  Younger voters will also not hesitate to cast their votes for the opposition as they feel that the PAP is not really listening to them.

I have no comment on the YPAP as I don’t really know much about them.

Continue Reading
Click to comment
Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Current Affairs

Ng Eng Hen: Dust clouds likely caused armoured vehicle collision during Exercise Wallaby

Dust clouds limiting visibility likely contributed to the collision between two Hunter vehicles during Exercise Wallaby, Defence Minister Ng Eng Hen explained in his parliamentary reply. 12 servicemen sustained mild injuries, but safety measures prevented more serious outcomes. A formal investigation is ongoing to ensure further safety improvements.

Published

on

SINGAPORE: Low visibility caused by dust clouds was identified as the likely cause of the collision between two Hunter armoured fighting vehicles (AFVs) during Exercise Wallaby last month, Defence Minister Ng Eng Hen said in a written parliamentary response on Tuesday (15 October).

The incident, which occurred in Queensland, Australia, on 24 September 2024, resulted in mild injuries to 12 servicemen.

Dr Ng’s statement was in response to a parliamentary question from Mr Dennis Tan, Workers’ Party Member of Parliament for Hougang SMC.

Mr Tan asked for details on the accident, specifically its cause and whether any lessons could be applied to enhance training and operational safety within the Singapore Armed Forces (SAF).

The collision took place during a night-time movement of Hunter AFVs at the Shoalwater Bay Training Area.

The vehicles were returning to base when one rear-ended another. Dr Ng explained that the dust clouds generated by the AFVs’ movement significantly impaired visibility, might likely contributing to the accident.

The 12 affected servicemen sustained mild injuries and were promptly taken to the nearest medical facility.

None of the injuries required hospitalisation, and all 12 servicemen were able to rejoin their units for training the next day.

According to the minister, adherence to safety protocols—such as wearing seat belts and protective gear—played a crucial role in limiting the injuries to mild ones.

Following the incident, a safety pause was immediately implemented, with all drivers being reminded to maintain proper safety distances, especially when visibility was compromised.

Troops were also reminded to adhere strictly to safety protocols, including the proper use of safety equipment, Dr Ng added.

The safety lessons from the incident were shared not only with the affected units but also with other participating groups in the exercise, as well as units back in Singapore, through dedicated safety briefings.

Mr Tan also asked about the broader implications of the incident. In his response, Dr Ng said that a formal investigation had been launched in accordance with SAF’s safety incident protocol.

The investigation aims to assess the circumstances more thoroughly and identify any further measures that could be taken to enhance safety.

Dr Ng shared that recommendations arising from the investigation will be implemented where necessary.

Exercise Wallaby is SAF’s largest unilateral overseas exercise, and the 2024 edition began on 8 September, running until 3 November.

The exercise involves approximately 6,200 personnel, including 500 operationally ready national servicemen.

The exercise has been conducted at Shoalwater Bay Training Area in Queensland since 1990, and it is a key part of SAF’s overseas training program.

The Hunter AFV, one of the vehicles involved in the collision, is a state-of-the-art platform jointly developed by the Defence Science and Technology Agency, the Singapore Army, and ST Engineering.

It replaced the SAF’s aging fleet of Ultra M113 AFVs in 2019, which had been in service since the 1970s. The Hunter is equipped with advanced features, including a 30mm cannon, a 76mm smoke grenade launcher, and an automatic target detection and

tracking system designed to enhance operational effectiveness. It is also capable of traveling at increased speeds and covering longer distances, making it a versatile asset for the SAF.

Continue Reading

Current Affairs

Government to “carefully consider” Lee Hsien Yang’s demolition application for 38 Oxley Road

The Singapore Government will “carefully consider” Mr Lee Hsien Yang (LHY)’s application to demolish the house at 38 Oxley Road. LHY announced his intent on Tuesday morning following the recent death of his sister, Dr Lee Wei Ling, reaffirming his commitment to honour his parents’ wish for the house’s demolition.

Published

on

The Singapore Government has indicated that it will “carefully consider” Mr Lee Hsien Yang’s (LHY) application to demolish the family home at 38 Oxley Road.

LHY, the youngest son of Singapore’s founding Prime Minister, the late Lee Kuan Yew (LKY), announced his intention to apply for the demolition in a Facebook post on 15 October 2024, following the death of his sister, Dr Lee Wei Ling, on 9 October.

The announcement marks a significant development in the ongoing saga over the fate of the historically significant property, which has been at the heart of a family dispute since LKY’s passing in 2015.

In his will, executed in December 2013, LKY expressed his desire for the house to be demolished “immediately after” Dr Lee moved out of the property. Dr Lee, a prominent neurologist, had been the last remaining resident of the house.

LHY reaffirmed his commitment to carrying out his father’s wishes, stating, “After my sister’s passing, I am the only living executor of my father’s estate. It is my duty to carry out his wishes to the fullest extent of the law.”

He added that he would seek to build a small private dwelling on the site, which would be “held within the family in perpetuity”.

LHY also referenced his brother, Senior Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (LHL) remarks in Parliament in 2015, when he was Prime Minister, stating that upon Dr Lee’s passing, the decision to demolish the house would rest with the “Government of the day.”

In response to media queries regarding LHY’s announcement, a spokesperson for the Ministry of National Development (MND) acknowledged the intended application and emphasised that the Government would “carefully consider issues related to the property in due course”.

The spokesperson also highlighted that any decision would need to balance LKY’s wishes, public interest, and the historical value of the house.

The house at 38 Oxley Road, where key decisions about Singapore’s path to independence were made, has been a focal point of public and political discussion.

The future of the house became contentious in 2017 when LHY and Dr Lee publicly accused their elder brother, LHL, of trying to preserve the house against their father’s wishes for political reasons.

LHL denied the accusations, issuing a Ministerial Statement in Parliament, where he also raised concerns over the preparation of their father’s final will. He clarified that he had recused himself from all decisions regarding the property and affirmed that any government action would be impartial.

In 2018, a “secret” ministerial committee, which was formed in 2016 to study the future of 38 Oxley Road, proposed three options: preserving the property and designating it as a national monument, partially demolishing the house while retaining the historically significant basement dining room, or allowing complete demolition for redevelopment. LHL accepted the committee’s conclusions but stated that no immediate decision was necessary, as Dr Lee was still living in the house.

In a statement conveyed by LHY on behalf of Dr Lee after her passing, she reiterated her strong support for her father’s wish to demolish the house. “My father, Lee Kuan Yew, and my mother, Kwa Geok Choo, had an unwavering and deeply felt wish for their house at 38 Oxley Road to be demolished upon the last parent’s death,” the statement read.

She added, “He had also appealed directly to the people of Singapore. Please honour my father by honouring his wish for his home to be demolished.”

Despite selling the house to LHY at market value in 2015, LHL’s stance regarding the house’s preservation became a public issue, especially after the family disclosed that the Government had raised concerns about reinstating the demolition clause in the 2013 will. The ministerial committee had reviewed the matter, but a final decision was deferred until now.

The fate of 38 Oxley Road remains to be seen, but the Government’s decision will likely have lasting implications for the legacy of the Lee family and the conservation of Singapore’s historical landmarks.

Continue Reading

Trending