By Leong Sze Hian

I refer to the article “Govt Payouts a grey area for nursing homes” (ST, Aug 23).

http://www.cpf.gov.sg/imsavvy/infohub_article.asp?readid={734381012-6184-4790874719}&print=1

I think for a destitute and penniless person, it may be a blow to their well being, if we deny them of even these “once in a long time” luxury. The purpose of such periodic Government payouts as I understand it, is to reward senior citizens who have contributed to Singapore’s success, by way of payouts like the GST credits.

Whilst I appreciate the fact that some nursing homes are short of funds in providing their excellent social services of housing and caring for the elderly poor, it is no excuse for not even getting the consent of nursing home residents to use their Government payouts to fund their stay.

For those who are of unsound mind, such as those with dementia, I agree that this practice may perhaps be acceptable.

Now that the Auditor-General’s Office (AGO) has flagged this practice, what are the Government agencies with oversight on nursing homes going to do about it?

I would also like to point out that the arrangement to allow intermediate and long-term care proxies to cash home residents’ cheques if they are unable to do so, should not be construed as the right to use their Government payouts.

In this connection, why is it that although the Ministry of Finance (MOF) said its guidelines made it clear that the payouts belong to the patients, it also declined to give a copy to the Straits Times?

I am also disturbed by the reason given by two homes that at briefings held by the authorities, they had been given the impression that they could use the payouts to defray the cost of caring for such patients. In my view, the reason given that some patients were not fully subsidised by the Government and had to be supported by the organisation’s funds coming from public donations, is irrelevant to the issue.

In this context, I fully concur with those nursing homes who said that they do not use the money because it would not be proper.

Finally, whilst I do not concur that homes should be penalized for using such monies in the past, they should at least be given clear guidelines now that such practices should not be allowed to continue.

So far, the silence by the authorities on this issue, is I must say, at best, not “golden” and quite puzzling!

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Foreign Minister Vivian Balakrishnan expresses gratitude towards supermarket staff and Town Council cleaners

The Minister of Foreign Affairs, Vivian Balakrishnan, expressed his gratitude towards unsung…

新柔捷运仍在谈判中 马国交长陆兆福:双方已达成“一致理解”

随着新柔捷运(RTS)项目展延期限(9月30日)将至,马来西亚交通部长陆兆福于昨日(19日)声称,新马已达成部分“一致的理解”,针对特定细节进行协商。 据《东方日报》报导,陆兆福周一(19日)为《中马港口联盟第4次会议》主持开幕仪式后,向记者透露,双方政府目前正针对细节进行协商,也会见新加坡交通部长许文远,以求达成双方一致的理解。 “我们都非常清楚新柔捷运的重要,所以目前正紧锣密鼓的为此事规划。事实上,我上月也会见了新加坡交通部长许文远,并达致了一些理解,惟还需要将细节整理出来。” 对此,交通部发言人则向《亚洲新闻台》表示,“目前双方尚在商讨中,务求双方能达成共识。然而,讨论正在进行,所以我们并不会对此作出任何评论。” 新柔捷运于2018年1月签署新柔捷运双边合作,捷运将衔接新山武吉查卡至兀兰北站,全程长4.2公里,每小时可运送约1万名乘客,预料可将两国之间超过1小时的行程缩短至30分钟。 该项目预计于2024年完成,却因经历马国改朝换代,新政府曾表示难以负担所需建设和征地成本,于是在2019年5月21日签署了项目延期协议。 根据协议,项目建设推迟直到2019年9月30日,马来西亚将向新加坡支付约600万新元,作为项目暂停期间新加坡维护相关设施的费用。 根据新柔捷运双方2018年1月签署的双方协议,新加坡地铁和马来西亚国家基建公司应于去年6月30日前成立合营公司,并于2018年9月30日前,在交通管理局和马国政府的特许下,指明该合营公司为马新捷运营运商,但均被延误。 期间,将由马来西亚决定是否继续执行项目,马来西亚也可提出任何项目改变,而我国将根据其项目改变斟酌。 许文远补充道,延期期限将会拖延工程完成的日子,而陆兆福则表示,项目成本将是考量的重点,会透过这期限内商讨各项可行之路。  

Singapore Polytechnic Year 2 student tests positive for COVID-19; SP switches to online learning for now

A Year 2 student from the Singapore Polytechnic (SP) School of Media,…

USA edges ahead in the race to commercialise the world’s first Hyperloop by unveiling its regulatory framework

The US Department of Transportation (USDOT) and the Non-Traditional and Emerging Transportation…