dead fishes

By Terry Xu

In recent days, fish farmers off the coast of Pasir Ris have seen almost all their fish stocks die off. Death of the fish stock in alarming numbers started from 16 February and have persisted since.

The fish farmers have been working furiously for the past few weeks to salvage their fish farms, but the scene at the farms remains one of devastation, with a sea of dead fishes floating in the fishnets.

Many of the fish farmers have given up. Mr Philip Lim, a fish farmer and Chairman of Singapore Marine Aquaculture Cooperative lost $50,000 worth of his fish stock at his farm.

kelong 1979
Launch of commercial kelongs in 1979

The fish farmers were still recovering from the loss they incurred from the plankton bloom and oil spill incident last year. Mr Lim claims that the Agri-Food and Veterinary Authority (AVA) took no action to assist the fish farmers on taking preventive measures.

This was despite receiving a warning from Mr. Lim on 27 January this year. Mr Lim also said that apart from being nonchalant about the situation, AVA is also apathetic towards the plight of independent fish farmers.

Despite the massive losses incurred by fish farmers, they will still be expected to fulfill the quota of 17 tonnes fish product imposed upon by the AVA as a requirement to retain their license for fish farms.

Mr Lim recounted how the AVA still demanded the schedule of fish product fulfillment from the fish farmers, despite knowing that the some of the fish farmers had lost most, if not all, of their fish stocks in the February last year.

“It just took one night to wipe out the whole fish stock… even so, AVA still came to ask us for how much we will produce in April, June.” said Mr Lim.

In fact, this was the reason why Mr Lim brought a larger quantity of fishlings this year from overseas to rear, so as to meet the quota given.

The quota for the fish farms has remained unchanged since licensing began in 1979. The many changes in ecology and the environment since then have all influenced the sizes of fish stocks produced by fish farmers.

The percentage of the local demand provided by the fish farms has changed dramatically too. In the past, local fish farms and fishermen provided up to 70% of the fish supply. Today, that has dwindled down to just 5%.

There is also no protection for the local fish farmers. The AVA explained to the fish farmers that the reason behind this is Singapore’s emphasis on free trade.

“This is why industrial fishing companies come in and move out within a few years; it is just not profitable in the eyes of the big companies.” said Mr Lim.

After a similar incident last year, Minister of State for Defence and National Development, Dr Mohamad Maliki Bin Osman, spoke in Parliament about the revocation of fish farm licenses.

He said, “When we revoked licences recently, there were a lot of pleas from the fish farmers. We want to try to help the fish farmers. The first thing is to help them develop their systems as well as to be able to produce. Certainly, there are targets that have been set in place because we have very limited spaces. We have limited water and land spaces for farming activities. With the farmers, we have put in place opportunities for them to improve other productivity levels.”

“Yes, in a worst case scenario, we will revoke licenses for those who have failed to comply with the regulations we put in place, including those who fail to produce the kind of quantity that is required. The way to go right now is to help them. We want to help the farmers because this is their livelihood. We want to try to be sympathetic even for those who have recently suffered the mass fish deaths.”

Mr Maliki also stated, “So as much as we want to try to make them comply, we will take a very calibrated approach to support them. For those who have failed over several years and they have not been taking part in productivity movements, certainly we will look at the worst case scenario of revoking their licenses.”

“They don’t even bother to give some allowance for us, say one or two years to recover from our losses,” said Mr Lim. He stated that this is especially true for fish farmers who are not in the good books of the AVA. “I tried to plea for other farmers last year, but AVA did not care.”

“For many of the fish farmers, they are from the pioneer generation and all they know is how to fish. They cannot survive on land and get a job.” “We are being abused for many years… we are paid to be a slave, to give them production,” said Mr Lim on the AVA’s attitude towards fish farmers.

TOC has written to AVA for their response on Monday and will provide the AVA’s reply once we receive them.

[vimeo id=”120996399″ align=”center” mode=”normal”]
Subscribe
Notify of
68 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Motorcyclist dies in accident involving two cars and trailer along SLE

A 45-year-old motorcyclist was killed in an accident involving two cars and…

Chan Chun Sing: We will find foreign PMETs to "complement" Singaporeans

In a media interview on Wed (27 May), Trade and Development Minister…

大年初一残杀妻女酿两尸三命案 前房屋经纪不认罪

残杀39岁的怀孕妻子和四岁女儿,前房屋经纪在藏尸9天后被揭发,更伪造字条谎称其实是和妻子一起殉情。 41岁的被告张锦兴(译音)被控在2017年1月20日(大年初一),在兀兰52通道第619座组屋六楼的住家中,涉嫌谋杀怀孕的妻子钟佩珊和四岁的女儿张芷宁,酿成两尸三命惨剧。 此宗案件于今天(7月2日)开审,他否认了上述的两项谋杀控状。 案情显示,被告原是拥有十余年经验的房屋经纪,他于2016年年尾透过有人介绍,到一间室内设计公司担任销售协调员。 被告自2015年开始,工作受到市场经济低迷影响,导致收入骤减,加上家庭和个人开销庞大,因此负债累累,欠债总额高达7万元。同时,他与妻子的婚姻也亮起红灯,而为了还债,他甚至瞒着妻子将屋子出售了。 案发当天,被告因为女儿学费拖欠问题而与妻子起争执,一时冲动就用毛巾将妻子勒死,又以同样的手法勒死女儿,然后企图烧尸并自杀,但是都没有成功。 被告较后和妻女的尸体同睡一床长达八天。 在第九天,就是大年初一时,被告妻子的家属因为无法联络对方,因此报警。警方和民防部在接到投报后上门查案,才揭发了此宗家庭悲剧。 此案预计将耗费两周进行审讯,控方也将传召约60人上庭作证。 若被控谋杀罪名成立,被告将会面对死刑。

高级律师及爱国者G拉曼博士安祥过世 享年82岁

文:前学运领袖、维权律师陈华彪 翻译:万章 2020年12月8日高级律师及爱国者G拉曼博士安祥过世,享年82岁。 新加坡法律界称呼他为可靠先生。 他以诚实,公平磊落,绅士风范和个人品德赢得了2014年新加坡律师协会CC Tan奖。 资深大律师Thio Shen Yi宣读表扬书时,形容拉曼博士是一位资深的律师,他以正直和坦率著称,他“无论对方的身份如何,都毫无疑虑的表达自己的观点。” 自1974年起,我很荣幸与拉曼律师成为朋友。拉曼一直是我多年的好友和同志。 尽管已经在政治上付出了沉重的代价,勇敢的他仍然对我这么说:“华彪,你须要我帮上什么忙,尽管让我知道。” 1974年,大卫·马绍尔(David…