By Howard Lee
MediaCorp Artiste Zoe Tay and comedian Judee Tan have put their names and faces behind the Sexual Assault Care Centre (SACC), announced by gender equality group AWARE in May this year, by releasing two online videos yesterday.
The videos will be the first of several planned video releases accompanying a newly launched crowdfunding campaign, which aims to raise S$30,000 in support of the SACC.
Donations will go towards building the drop-in centre, where an on-site social worker can assist clients immediately even if they walk in without an appointment.
The videos included interviews with sexual assault victims who related some of the emotions they went through, and how receiving a helping hand, at times by talking to someone and receiving counselling, helped them survive the ordeal.

Sexual Assault Care Centre website
Sexual Assault Care Centre website
SACC is Singapore’s first and only specialist service supporting women who face sexual assault, and was preceded by AWARE’s Sexual Assault Befrienders Service (SABS).
“In 2013, 192 women contacted SABS – a 45% jump from the year before,” said Ms Corinna Lim, AWARE’s executive director.  “This year we have already heard from 124 women, and the demand shows no sign of slowing.  We urgently need donations to refurbish our drop-in centre and continue providing our safe, free and confidential services.”
The crowdfunding campaign, AWARE’s first, was launched last evening at the Crystal Ball, the group’s annual fundraising gala event, which also hosted the annual AWARE Awards, aimed at honouring individuals and groups who have promoted gender equality in Singapore.
Award recipients include two young activists – Vanessa Ho, 26, an advocate for the rights of sex workers, and Theodore Chen, 13, and advocate against bullying.
Law firm WongPartnership received the corporate award for its high proportion of women in senior management positions.
The tongue-in-cheek Alamak Award went to Lim Tit Ming, chief executive officer of the Singapore Science Centre, for a disparaging email he sent to his staff members on International Women’s Day.
SACC also operates a helpline (6779 0282) and email support ([email protected]). The centre provides free legal advice by an experienced lawyer, therapeutic counselling by specialists and befriender services, where a trained befriender accompanies clients to the police station, hospital or court, providing support through processes which can often be difficult and intimidating.
Donations to the crowdfunding effort can be made online at www.sacc.causevox.com.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

估计10万工友所得少于最低薪资 林志蔚:政府渐进式薪制无助改善处境

对于有者不同意新加坡工人党倡议最低薪金制,老本行是经济学家的盛港候任议员林志蔚,发文比较最低薪金制和渐进式薪金模式的差异。 他分析政府推出的渐进式薪金模式把薪资和工作职能绑定,也给了雇主更很多空间“省成本”,且没有考量到劳资之间的权力差异。再者,对于那些无法提升技能的工友,只能继续生活在低工资的处境,“事实上,据我们估计,有10万名工友薪资少于最低薪资,显然渐进式模式对他们无效。” 他在文中指出,最低薪资制尽管不是毫无疑问的好政策,但他是立足于证明,能改善雇员处境的良好开端。而在英美国家,所有的综合分析(meta- analyses)也显示,最低薪资制实则对于雇员就业问题,几乎没有影响。 而近期的研究,也倾向支持最低薪资制,即时薪资涨幅很大,对于低薪工友的就业问题实则带来冲击微小。 过去,本地反对最低薪资制的论述,不外乎认为这将造成雇主不愿聘用更多低薪工友、恐加剧失业问题等。前内阁部长、职总前秘书长的林文兴,曾认为最低薪资并无法改善低收入群体的困境。他也为此议题与巡回大使许通美教授论战。 林志蔚本身也是位经济学家,拥有美国哈佛大学历史学硕士、美国加利福尼亚大学圣克鲁兹分校国际经济学、哲学博士资历,目前也是ESSEC商学院经济学副教授。 不过,他也提出在推出最低薪资政策前,应设定评估框架和独立的最低薪检讨委员会,根据本地的情况作出调整。 至于谁该为最低薪资制买单?有者认为政府会为此付出代价,但林志蔚则解释,实际上他不会带来财政影响,可能由七成由消费者支付更高价格、三成由雇主承担。但他认为,关键在于,要把谈判薪资的权力,从资本方重新分配给劳动力。 “我认为我们可以承担一些费用,来照顾社会上较不富裕 群体,随着消费者比最低薪资工友多,对价格的影响也就减少。”

谴责听证会审问异议者 加国学者声援覃炳鑫

再有国际学者跨海声援本地历史学者覃炳鑫博士,谴责新加坡国会“应对网络蓄意假消息”特选委员会,恶意打压覃博士针对新国历史的异议,严重侵害和不尊重学术自由,有必要向后者作出公开道歉。 加拿大大学讲师协会(CAUT)认可覃炳鑫博士的历史学者身份,专研上世纪5、60年代新加坡独立斗争史实。该协会以执行总监大卫罗宾逊名义,致函上述特委会主席暨新加坡国会副议长张有福,作出严正抗议。 该协会控诉,在今年3月由国会特选委员会召开的“应对网络蓄意假消息”的公开听证会,覃炳鑫遭六个小时的恶意盘问,已偏离原本要讨论的陈情书内容,实则藉此驳斥覃的历史观点和对政府的批评。 “覃炳鑫的研究已经受过同行的评议,但是在质询过程,特委会意图透过断章取义的方式,质疑覃炳鑫的历史观点。特选委员会的质询侵害了覃炳鑫的学术自由,以及在免于被当权者报复下发表其研究的权益。” 捍卫学者发表学术观点 拥有70万教职员会员的加拿大讲师协会称,该会致力捍卫学术自由,学者们传授、学习、研究和出版他们的研究或思想,应免于受任何体制或教条的规范、报复或歧视。 “覃博士受到的对待,彰显了新加坡当权者对待学界的态度,也威压国内其他学者行使他们的学术自由。” 为研究应对网路上蓄意散播的假消息,新加坡政府从2018年3月14日至29日,国会特选委员会召开公开听证会,广纳谏言,收集公民组织意见。在最后一天,却上演成律法部长沙姆甘针对覃炳鑫的审问。 然而,覃炳鑫提到1963年冷藏行动和1987年光谱逮捕行动,目的在于政治利益,而非国家安全问题,批评人民行动党和前总理李光耀,才是假新闻的散播者,引起律法部长善姆甘等人围剿。 针对上世纪50、60年代期间,新加坡是否有共产主义阴谋散布?左翼份子是否受马共唆使企图进行不利新加坡的政治活动,才有必要进行逮捕行动,覃炳鑫和善姆甘展开六小时的审问拉锯战。 质疑覃炳鑫历史观的理据 在过程中,善姆甘以“是或不是”、“同不同意”、“你有读过这些资料吗?”“对与否”等威权式的提问,无意与覃炳鑫对话,过度简化复杂的历史争议,其背后意图却是要质疑覃炳鑫历史研究的正当性和理据。…

WP’s Pritam Singh to allocate 50% of his salary as Leader of Opposition for low-income residents, party programmes, charitable causes

The Workers’ Party (WP) chief Pritam Singh took to his Facebook on…

AHTC trial has a silver lining

Perhaps witness for Aljunied Hougang Town Council (AHTC), Mr Goh Thien Phong,…