Ngerng addresses a crowd of thousands

By Howard Lee
Barely 15 minutes into the first speech, and there was already about 2,000 people gathered at Hong Lim Park to hear speakers talk about the Central Provident Fund and to demand that the government return CPF monies to citizens.
The crowd demographics was mixed – while there were many senior citizens, most of them were in the 30s to 40s, of typical working age.

Many came with umbrellas to brave the heat, but as the evening came and brought cool relief, participants started to move away from the shade of the tree line towards the stage.
Event organisers claimed there were 6,000 participants at the protest, although conservative estimates using photographs would put the total number of attendees at about 3,500. Even so, this number far exceeds the 1,200 sign-ups on the event’s Facebook page.
While not as numerous as those who attended the first Population White Paper protest, attendees gave some insights as to why this is the case – chiefly because they had a broad range of reasons for attending the protest.
Some were happy to be there to make up the numbers, as a visible sign of protest. Chris, 33, said, “I wanted to show support at this event, because a large crowd sends a signal to the government that we want changes made to the CPF system.”
His views were echoed by speaker Vincent Wijeysingha, who opined that the strong turnout would “make the government very worried, wherever they may be.”
Others were there to show support for Roy Ngerng, or at least express displeasure for the lawsuit that the Prime Minister has taken up against him. “Roy made a mistake, but suing him is not the way,” opined Mr Abdul Salim, 33. “(Prime Minister) Lee Hsien Loong want Singapore to be a more open society, to have more trust in the government. Then he (needs to) tell the people what the facts are, instead of suing.”
But the content of the protest was not lost on some, who were present because they were interested in an alternative view of CPF. Mr Weng, 64, said, “I try to attend all the events at Hong Lim Park. I’m not for or against any party, I try to stay neutral. But I’m interested to know what (the speakers) can bring forward.”
Jackson, 30, who was there with his friends, said, “I want to hear what the speakers have to say about CPF, as I wanted another point of view.”
JQ, 29, shared similar sentiments. “I want to know more about CPF and support those who are against the Minimum Sum – among my friends, this seems to be a major concern.”
Indeed, the Minimum Sum – the base amount of funds that each CPF contributor has to set aside for when they reach 65 years-old, the balance of which they can withdraw when they reach 55 years-old – seems to be a main concern of many participants at the protest.
“The Minimum Sum is increasing every year,” said Jackson. “I don’t think Singaporeans will be able to support this in the future.”
Jackson was not the only young Singaporean who was concerned about the future viability of the Minimum Sum. “The majority of Singaporeans, (looking at) how much we earn now, will not be able to meet this amount,” offered JQ.
“I’m very concerned – a few years down the road, what will the Minimum Sum be?” shared Mr Abdul Salim. “Can I meet it, can I take it out?”
“I want to get my money back,” said Mr Weng. “The government should not lock up our money. I have 40% of my CPF locked up (in the Minumum Sum). I mean, I’m a retiree now, and I tried asking the CPF front office for it, but they didn’t do anything.”
Ibrahim, 60, shared similar sentiments. “I am old enough to know how to spend my own money, so why does the government want to control my CPF? I want to use it to help support my daughter who is studying in Australia. I also need to spend some on my Hajj, as this is a very important religious obligation for me.”
“I tried speaking to my Member of Parliament, but he did not help. I’m not happy with it,” he added.
Despite these worries, concern for Roy Ngerng and the lawsuit he faces were evident among the protesters.
A mob followed him when he arrived, and his appearance on stage as the last speaker was met with wild cheers and calls of support. At the end of the event, a small crowd gathered at the stage to offer well-wishes and take pictures with him.

Subscribe
Notify of
1 Comment
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

二国人到柔丰盛港泛舟失踪

两位新加坡人乘着连假出游,到柔佛丰盛港参加独木舟泛舟活动,但之后不知所踪,至今马国海事执法机构的搜救工作仍在进行中。 目前,已确认两位失踪者为52岁的陈英顺和64岁的潘玉婷(名字皆为译音)。 马国海事执法机构在昨晚发文告指出,新山海上救援中心在9日下午2时15分,接获丰盛港区警方通知,指两名新加坡人在丰盛港兴楼一带岛屿进行独木舟活动后,不知去向。 他们和另外13人,于前日从直落慕桑(Teluk kesang)划艇到磨当岛(Pulau  Mertang )。不过,队友过后在傍晚时分发现,共划一艘双人艇的两人已经掉队。 文告称事发时两位失踪者共乘一艘亮绿色的皮艇。 马国队伍则在昨日下午3时30分启动搜救行动,并在兴楼本亚邦渡轮码头设立搜救基地。

Family of otters spotted trying to cross road in Central Business District during morning rush hour

Why did the otters cross the road? To get to the otter…

搁置店外无人看管 一篮生鸡成老鼠美食

一篮装在塑料袋里的生鸡肉被搁置在咖啡店外,没人看管,老鼠直接爬到鸡肉内享受美食,被网民拍下视频放到社交媒体上,立刻引起网民纷纷表示“卫生没有被重视!” 有关的视频长达35秒,被网民上载到社媒群组All Singapore Stuff。视频上在写到,“有没搞错,一只老鼠睡在一只鸡内,在大巴窑4号路的咖啡店发现。希望他们接着会将生鸡丢掉。为什么如此放在外面?” 视频中可见一篮装在塑料袋的生鸡,相信是鸡肉供应商在早晨将鸡肉送到咖啡馆外,就放置在该处,没有将塑料袋绑好,也没人看管。篮子内其中一个塑料袋中的生鸡胸腔内,可以看到有东西在乱窜。 网民将镜头拉近一看,惊见该乱窜的东西既然是一只老鼠。网民随后踢了踢篮子,鸡胸内的老鼠受惊跑了出来,但是仍然藏在塑料袋内。 网民促列新卫生条例 有关事件已经传出,网民纷纷表示留言反映,共取得374个品论,超过2500人转发。 网民表示,有关的事件并不新鲜,曾经见过类似情况,甚至有鸟类坐在生肉上。 网民表示供应商有责任确保所供应的食物卫生程度,应该将生鸡放在保鲜盒中。 网民质疑供应商必须对此负责,但是也有人表示摊主和供应商都有责任。 网民也呼吁环境卫生局采取行动。他们认为,应该要针对类似事件拟定新的卫生条例,确保处理生食的商家和供应商能够保障食物卫生。…