by Foong Swee Fong

The people have heard it again and again — that the People’s Action Party (PAP) needs a solid mandate so that they can lead with confidence, execute effective policies even if unpopular, they will not be pushed around by foreign governments, etc.

But as people have given them solid mandates at the polling booths time after time — with always a supermajority in Parliament, what has happened after that?

PAP has introduced and increased the Goods & Service Tax (GST), signed free trade agreements such as the Comprehensive Economic Cooperation Agreement (CECA) without seeking inputs or approval from the people, charged the people with market-priced land on which their HDB sits (albeit with subsidy), brought in loads of foreigners to “steal their lunch”, the list goes on.

When the first major recession struck in 1985, the PAP sacrificed the people by freezing their pay and cutting their Central Provident Funds (CPF) so that the ship would not sink.

That’s probably what it means for a strong mandate — that the people are willing to endure more unpopular measures from the PAP.

When will the people learn that the interest of the PAP is not of them, but of business, especially big businesses?

The PAP will look after the welfare of the people only up to the point of securing their votes at the General Elections, no more.

On the other hand, since businesses provide employment, and pay wages and taxes. They are the “National Interest”, therefore the people have to bend backwards for them.

And because the people have done so in the interest of the country, Singapore is now rich and has a strong currency.

Yet, if the people want the PAP to pay more attention to their welfare, ironically, is to give them a weak mandate, so that they will work for a strong one.

Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong says such brinkmanship may unintentionally topple the PAP as government, but given the rising cost of living and the rising unhappiness of the lower to middle classes, it may become intentional.

This was first posted on Mr Foong’s Facebook page and republished with permission.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Ariffin Sha: BOOKIE ODDS = FAKE NEWS

by Ariffin Sha If you receive such messages, do not forward them…

82-year-old elderly spends a year living at HDB void deck bench; netizens offer assistance

An 82-year-old man in Singapore, Yip Woon Cheong, has been living on a bench in the void deck of an HDB flat for a year, after his separation from his wife and being left solely dependent on government financial assistance of around S$100 a month. Mr Yip, who had never begged anyone for money and had saved S$1,000 in his bank account, said he had worked until 60, after which he depended on his CPF when he ran out of funds. Despite his children not helping him, he has no regrets and is moving into a rental flat with the help of volunteers and individuals who donated necessities and appliances to him.

Former GIC Chief Economist: Just worried that SPF may be inadequately resourced to keep up its excellent work

Below is a response written by former GIC economist Yeoh Lam Keong…

Rising rent distresses expats in Singapore: German companies and employees feel the pinch as private housing rents surge at fastest pace in 15 years

German companies and their employees in Singapore are feeling the impact of rising housing rents, according to a survey by the Singaporean-German Chamber of Industry and Commerce (SGC). The study found that almost half of German employers surveyed in Singapore (44%) reported lower work performance and psychological distress among staff due to the unpredictable housing situation. Half of the firms polled anticipate rents rising by 30% to 50% in 2023, while 16% see even higher increases of more than 50%. The survey also revealed that 43% of German firms would consider relocating certain business functions out of Singapore due to increasing costs and difficulty in recruiting talent.