At a media interview on Wednesday (1 Sep) to mark his first 100 days as Manpower Minister, Dr Tan See Leng told reporters that he has “very good mentors” helping him to transit from the private sector to the public sector.

Dr Tan first entered politics in the General Election last year. After winning the election in Marine Parade GRC, he was appointed a minister in the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO) and Second Minister for Manpower and for Trade and Industry.

In May this year, he officially became the Minister for Manpower replacing Josephine Teo. Mrs Teo was moved to the Ministry of Communications and Information (MCI).

Among his “very good mentors”, Dr Tan listed Mrs Teo as one of those who provided invaluable guidance and support to him.

“She was a very good mentor, (she) understands and provided me with a lot of guidance and support in terms of the dormitories,” he praised Mrs Teo.

“I remember when I was first appointed in August last year and very quickly went head-on into it, I could always count on the support from Minister Josephine Teo and the entire team.”

While Mrs Teo provided Dr Tan with a lot of guidance and support in terms of the dormitories, it is not known if she had also provided the migrant workers with the same guidance and support with regard to their dormitories.

Last year, COVID-19 infections spread like wildfire in many of the migrant workers’ dormitories. During a Parliamentary debate in May last year, one nominated member of parliament (NMP) asked Mrs Teo if the Government would apologise to the workers for the “dismal conditions” at their dormitories, which aided in the spread of the pandemic.

Mrs Teo replied, “I have not come across one single migrant worker himself that has demanded an apology.”

She added that it was unnecessary to compare Singapore’s response to other countries, after another MP asked why Singapore’s foreign worker infection rate was much higher when compared to other countries that had a similarly large migrant worker population.

“In terms of dealing with COVID-19, countries have their own unique situation to deal with, including how they want to address the migrant workers-related issues,” said Mrs Teo.

Subscribe
Notify of
47 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

被没收滑板车累积逾千仓储费? 陆交局:宽限期后未领取才计日收费

电动滑板车不符规格被没收,还要支付近两千元的仓储费?对于日前网络疯传的信函,陆路交通管理局作出澄清,表示只要在“宽限期”前,用户前来索回滑板车,就不会征收仓储费。 早前,网络疯传一则信函,收信人不合格的超重(27.7公斤)电动滑板车,在7月30日被陆交局执法人员没收。根据规定,包括电动滑板车等代步工具重量不可超过20公斤。 信中提到事主须在本月15日早上10时前往陆交局调查部门报到,协助调查违规使用过重滑板车一案。但是,信中也提到,事主还需缴付150元的拖车费,以及从车辆被扣当天算起,每日21元4角的仓储费。 事主的滑板车在两个月前被没收,若要从被没收当天算起至本月15日足足77天,仓储费可以高达1千647元8角! 而假设事主无法出席周一的调查会面,当局可在不另行通知下,销毁被没收的电动滑板车,同时,还会对事主拖欠的仓储费和拖车费,采取法律行动。 信函先是在本地道路资讯脸书Raod.sg上载,随即引来民众为事主抱不平,认为滑板车被没收的惩罚已够严重,对陆交局还要向事主征收仓储费感到难以置信,也认为这形同双重惩处,有欠公平。 不过,陆交局留意到网络流传的讯息,也很快在本月16日在官方脸书专页澄清,在当局完成调查后,对于那些符合资格的用户将获得“宽限期”来领回被没收的代步工具。过了宽限期还未领取,才会被征收仓储费。 不过,当局并未说明宽限期多久。至于对被没收代步工具征收高昂拖车费,除了补贴执法时的开支,也希望起到惩戒作用,警惕民众莫触法。 根据《道路交通法》第276章657项,针对摩多、脚踏车、电动脚踏车或个人代步工具等的没收费用为150元,仓储费为21元4角钱。 在今年5月1日,《活跃通勤法案》(Active Mobility Act)开始生效。新条例规定,电动脚踏车(PAB)和个人代步工具的重量不可超过20公斤、70公分宽和摩多驱动时需限速25时速。…

维文出访马国”稻乡“吉打与槟城

新加坡外交部长维文于今明两日,出访马来西亚吉打和槟城两个州属,重申新加坡与吉打长期友好关系,并放眼拓展双边合作,包括促进两地之间政府官员、商界领袖和青年的交流。 根据外交部官方文告,维文昨早会晤吉打苏丹端姑沙烈胡丁、王储东姑沙拉弗丁、州务大臣慕克力和吉打行政议员等人。 维文也邀请吉打苏丹和慕克力前来新加坡进行访问。 此后,他与吉打行政议员共进下午茶,了解当地经济和工业发展计划,并相信两地之间可做得更多,并期许可启动更多的交流。 维文昨日在脸书分享,新加坡和马国各个州属,在各领域都有联系,希望能重申和这些地方悠久历史、在经济上以及人与人之间的联系。 另一方面,他也前往槟城大山脚拜访安华长女,巴东埔国会议员努鲁依莎。 有“烈火莫熄”公主之称的努鲁依莎,在今年三月抛下震撼弹,直言对希盟政府改革缓慢感到失望,也表明来届选举将不参选。 她已担任了三届国会议员。但是他在去年12月12月辞去公正党副主席和槟城州主席职务后,再于昨天宣布辞去国会公共账目委员会成员一职。

评论:个人代步工具– 关于阶级和愚昧无知

Nicholas Tang: 我必须老实说,我讨厌个人代步工具。我认为他们对社会是有威胁的,落实针对电动滑板车的禁令是应该的。我们也有同样的不满:我们讨厌它们在行人道上快速移动,我们讨厌个人代步工具让我们在已经非常狭窄的行人道,让路人无法安全走路,但通常就是很反感电动滑板车大声播放令人难受的音乐(例如小苹果),我觉得应该要把这也列为“犯罪行为”。 尽管如此,我却认为政府不应该禁止个人代步工具。当然,禁令是最简单快速的解决方式,但却不是最佳方案。这不仅仅是交通安全法规的问题,个人代步工具更像是揭露了社会的裂痕,而我们需要对这些裂痕加以修复,避免社会基础崩裂。我将聚焦在三种不同的要素,他们互相交织与连结,不能仅单独讨论:阶级、政府政策与社会责任。 阶级问题 其中阶级可分为两种问题:首先,他们被视为实用实惠,大众均负担得起;再者,个人代步工具开启了送餐行业新景象,让过去无法负担昂贵高效交通工具的人,找到另一种工作机会。 第一点,在颁布禁令后,网友何益豪(Kelvin Ho)将自己对禁令的不满发布到网上,其中已可明显看见阶级主义的效应。在Reddit中,所有的评论大部分聚焦在嘲笑他作为送餐员与新加坡口音。 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=czuM9-uxnJ4 嘲笑他人口音缺同理心 当然或许他的送餐经验相对缺乏,但他确实提出几点值得讨论。此外,新加坡确实有一部分人的口音如同何益豪,尽管不能理解他的论点,但也不能成为攻击他个人品行的原因,这显示社会不同阶层的人对彼此缺乏同理心的一种表现。 何益豪提出了观点:不是每个拥有个人代步工具的人,都能够负担摩托车,或是其他交通工具。…

Some changes at TOC

  Dear Readers, As some of you may have heard by now,…