Stockphoto of a restaurant business

In a letter published on The Straits Times (ST) Forum on Tuesday (20 July), titled ‘Restaurant mistaken for pivoted nightlife venue, new restaurant owner Goh Tong Hann recounted an incident where the authorities caused great anxiety to his staff when his restaurant was mistaken for a pivoted nightlife establishment and was given less than an hour to shut down on a busy night.

“I opened the restaurant of my dreams in January, jumping at the opportunity because of favourable rent when we took over what was previously an ailing nightclub venue in a prime downtown area,” Mr Goh wrote.

Noting that the past six months have been filled with the expected highs and lows of any new operation on top of other pandemic-related challenges like pivoting to delivery, he explained that the restaurant was recently visited by plain-clothes Singapore Police Force (SPF) officers who told his staff to shut down operation.

According to Mr Goh, this took place on a busy Friday night, and his staff were given less than an hour to comply.

This was “moments after the revised regulations” were released, just a week after the restaurant had revised its dining floor plan to cater to groups of five.

He continued: “We were given less than an hour to do so. When I probed further, I received three responses – ‘Haven’t you seen the new regulations?’, ‘Didn’t SFA (Singapore Food Agency) send you a message?’ and ‘You are on the list that I have’.”

One of the officers then handed them a flier before walking away. The flier, however, was addressed to “nightlife venues that pivoted to F&B establishments”.

As such, Mr Goh decided not to close the restaurant that night since “it was clear that the actions were a result of incorrect information”.

Even so, the officers returned at 10pm to shut the restaurant down.

“No resolution was reached that night,” said Mr Goh.

He continued, “While I fully understood why we might have been put on that list, I expected SFA and SPF to have done their homework before starting their sting operation.

“From an Accounting and Corporate Regulatory Authority BizFile+ account and bank accounts, to changing the use of the property and having an SFA licence, all our documents were new.

“A simple search would have shown that we were in no way related to the previous occupants of the unit.”

What’s more, Mr Goh asserted that the officers would have been greeted by a large open kitchen in the front of the restaurant, adding that it would have been obvious that the people at the tables were having full meals instead of bar snacks.

“A masquerading nightlife venue we certainly are not,” he stressed.

Mr Goh went on to say that he and his staff endured an “anxiety-riddled 24 hours”, wondering if they should shut down the next day since they could not get ahold of any of the relevant agencies over the weekend.

Eventually, in deciding that the financial burden would be too high to close on a busy Saturday night, the restaurant stayed open.

Fortunately, Mr Goh said that he received a phone call from the police after 8pm that Saturday night, officially permitting them to stay open.

“It has been blow after blow for the food and beverage industry in Singapore, and while I understand that many of the measures taken are necessary, the situation could have been handled better,” he concluded.

Pivoted nightlife venues linked to recent clusters of COVID-19 cases

In response to growing COVID-19 clusters detected at KTV lounges or nightclubs that had pivoted as Food & Beverage (F&B) establishments, the Multi-Ministry Taskforce (MTF) announced on yesterday that it will roll back the country’s control measures to Phase 2 (Heightened Alert).

The cluster was first announced by the Ministry of Health (MOH) on 12 July with three cases linked to it. Just over a week later on 20 July, the number of cases linked to the KTV lounges/clubs cluster spiked to 207.

The alarming rise in cases linked to the cluster raised questions as to how these outlets could even be open given that nightclubs and KTVs have not been permitted to operate under the current COVID-19 regulations since they were shut down back in March 2020.

However, it was noted that in August last year, the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) and Ministry of Trade and Industry (MTI) allowed nightlife establishments to pivot to F&B operations as a way to keep going, so long as they adhered to relevant safety measures.

To “pivot”, these establishments would have had to apply for various licenses.

As of May 2021, over 400 nightlife operators had received the Singapore Food Agency (SFA) food shop or snack counter license enabling them to temporarily pivot to F&B operations.

Beyond that, the Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA) grants a one-year temporary conversion for outlets that have pivoted to F&B operations, subject to conditions.

Subscribe
Notify of
28 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

【国会】应对疫情之际调涨税收、费用 梁文辉忧无助坚定民众对政府信任

在当前面对疫情和经济等严峻挑战,国人对政府的信任尤为重要。不过,前进党非选区议员梁文辉就指出,政府一方面出台应付冠病危机的措施,但同时又急着增加税收和水电等收费,并无助于坚定民众对政府领导的信念。 梁文辉在本月14日在国会参与副总理兼财长王瑞杰的部长声明。他列举了近两周内宣布增加成本的部分,首先在9月29日,全民重症保险计划终身健保明年初起,从以往的11.5巴仙增至35.4巴仙,即指保费从每年的1千元增至1千350元。 不过随着保费上涨,保险范围有随之增加,梁文辉坦言,对于因疫情受到打击的人民来说,确实是令人欣慰的消息。 其次,9月30日,新加坡能源有限公司(SP Group)宣布在今年最后一个季度(自10月至12月)上调了9.3巴仙的电费。 “自2012年开始,电力市场自由化以来,却赚取数十亿元,在首次电费上涨后,就在电费上涨的路上“前进”,即使在新加坡人正遭受疫情的打击。” 尽管价格上涨是因为电力公司的成本相对提高,但梁文辉认为,新加坡能源公司可以轻易地从过去赚取的利润中吸收,而不是将增加成本的费用推到消费者身上。 “增加税收和收费显然无法借此提高人们的信心。与此同时,政府却承诺给出冠病19补贴措施,如同给人民一颗糖后,再给你一巴掌。” 另一方面,梁文辉也指出陆路交通局上周也宣布,自10月12日起,将会在中央高速公路六个收费门架提高电子道路收费(ERP)1元,以缓解高峰期的拥挤路况。 梁文辉认为,这无疑给新加坡的家庭户增加了数百元的支出,而且也质疑是否在未来,消费税也会因此提高。 “这些难道不能推迟到以后再实施吗?新加坡能源公司能否以过去的利润来吸收关税的增长?ERP不能再缓缓吗?保费增长也不能再推迟一到两年,因为目前的保险索赔毕竟仍远远低于收取的保费。 梁文辉也表示,虽然政府一直不想透露国家储备状况,但根据目前以公布的资料而言,截至2020年3月底,我国共拥有1.35万亿元的金融资产。…

CPF MS hike meets with swift criticism from public

On Thursday, the government announced that the Minimum Sum (MS) which Singaporeans…

5 Minutes With… Tan Kin Lian on gambling

“I consider the risk of a gambling habit to be only part of a larger problem. We need to educate our young people about financial responsibility – to spend within their means and to avoid incurring debts that attract high rates of interest.” – Tan Kin Lian