A woman was assaulted while out on a brisk walk as a man harassed her for having her mask down before kicking her in the chest.

The story was shared on Instagram by the woman’s daughter, Parveen Kaur, and reposted on Wake Up, Singapore’s Instagram feed on Sunday (9 May) evening.

In the account, Ms Kaur started with a disclaimer: “To anyone who says racism doesn’t exist in Singapore and we should be thankful we aren’t in countries where minorities are in physical danger, read this.”

She then described how her mother, 55-year-old private tutor Hindocha Nita Vishnubhai, works near her home and takes brisk walks to work as a daily exercise. As she is brisk walking, Madam Nita had her mask down, as it need not be donned for such an activity.

However, during one of the walks to work, Ms Kaur said a man had come up to her mother and started harassing her to put her mask on.

Ms Kaur relayed, “She explained she was brisk walking but he didn’t care. He hurled vulgarities and racial slurs at her.”

“My mum responded with a “God bless you” and the guy kicked her in the chest.”

Ms Kaur said her mum fell and landed on her back, hurting herself further. The man ran away after the incident and left the older woman “shaking in tears”.

Ms Kaur noted that her mother was too shocked to call the police at the time and turned up to work, “bleeding and shaken.”

She lamented, “Now my mum is afraid of taking a walk in her own country.”

“I can’t comprehend the hatred it would have taken to attack a complete stranger,” she added, cursing anyone who “downplays racism” in Singapore.

“All it takes is a trigger, be it anti-CECA sentiments or blaming a country in crisis for local COVID outbreaks, for silent racism to manifest into violence,” she concluded.

The incident happened as Mdm Nita was walking from Choa Chu Kang MRT station towards the stadium around 8.30 am on Friday (7 April). The Straits Times (ST) reported Mdm Nita’s account of the incident where she said, “He shouted at me to put my mask above my nose. I patiently told him that I was exercising which is why I had the mask below my nose.”

“He then started to abuse me and even used a racial slur, I was absolutely shocked. I do not like confrontation and I wanted to avoid an argument with him, so I said ‘God bless you’ and decided to walk away,” she added.

He then ran towards her and did a “flying kick”, she said.

“It was a very forceful kick which caused me to fall to the ground. I kept saying ‘he kicked me, he kicked me’. I was in complete disbelief,” said the victim, who weighs about 60kg and is 1.6m tall, according to the ST report.

The man then ran away after she fell, sustaining scratches on her hands and arms.

A bystander who saw what happened from a nearby bus stand rush to Mdm Nita’s aid.

In the caption of the Wake Up, Singapore post at 9.05 pm, it was noted that the victim has filed a police report and was told to file a Magistrate’s Complaint.

It included an unattributed quote: “Yes she did eventually make a police report on the night of the attack but their hands were tied, they can’t investigate the case without a magistrates complaint.

“She’s gonna get assessed by a doctor as the first step for the magistrates complaint.”

About an hour after the post was up on Wake Up, Singapore’s Instagram feed, social activist Ariffin Sha shared on Facebook that “it is concerning that the victim was allegedly informed by the Police to file a Magistrate’s Complaint when she filed her police report.”

He added, “Surely the Police can exercise their discretion to commence investigations without the need for a Magistrate’s Complaint? Especially so in a case where the victim is a 55-year old mother who was the victim of a vile and racist assault on the eve of Mother’s Day.”

Mr Ariffin stressed his belief that there should be more clarity from the police as to why the victim was instructed to file a Magistrate’s Complaint and what guides police discretion to not commence an investigation but ask a victim to file a Magistrate’s Complaint first.

TOC has reached out to the Ministry of Home Affairs and the Singapore Police Force yesterday for comments on the police’s position.

The Straits Times has reported that the police is investigating the man involved, believed to be in his 20s, for voluntarily causing hurt and harassment.

Subscribe
Notify of
80 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

The Dolphin Project makes proposal to RWS over dolphins

The following is a letter from Mr Richard O’Barry to Resorts World…

Expect more rain in the later part of July

Singaporeans can expect more rain in the later part of July and…

930,000 HDB households to receive GST voucher-U-Save in July 2019

About 930,000 Singaporean HDB households will receive the next instalment of the…

遭官司拖沓四年 前女佣巴蒂终于踏上返乡路

去年9月4日,印尼籍前女佣巴蒂上诉得直,原被指控偷窃雇主樟宜机场集团主席廖文良的5万元财物,获改判无罪。 据客工组织情义之家(HOME)志工、本地学者卓君美(Stephenie Chok)在脸书分享,巴蒂今早(27日)终于搭上班机返回印尼。 “四年她无法见见自己的母亲一面,还得想尽办法保护家人不受负面新闻影响。四年必须持特别准证无法在新加坡工作,四年需要暂居庇护所,等待那可能颠覆她命运的裁决。” 46岁的印尼籍前女佣,曾在樟宜机场集团主席廖文良家中帮佣近九年,于2016年10月28日被开除后,遭前雇主父子报警指控偷走逾五万元的财物。而巴蒂在被开除当天就返回印尼,后因廖家父子的指控,于2016年12月2日回到我国时被逮捕。 为了配合调查,巴蒂自2016年12月就滞留在本地,但因无法工作,她就一直居住在由情义之家所经营的收容所内,依靠该组织的援助至今已将近四年。 目前,巴蒂仍向涉及检控其案件的两名主控官,发起纪律研讯。其中一位主控官请了知名大律师文达星辩护。 四年前,卓君美海事情义之家的个案经理。尽管在2019年离任,仍继续以志工身份关心巴蒂案件的进展。 但她也指出,巴蒂终于能与家人团聚令她感欣慰,但与此同时,推动刑事司法改革的进程仍在继续。若巴蒂案能带来更多反思和有意义的改变,她认为我们需要继续叩门提出诉求、监督、请愿和抗议等。 她认为我们需要言论自由的空间向当权者讲真话,也需要当权者需时刻警提,他们也可能滥用本身的权力。 尽管巴蒂暂时回国,不过卓君美提及,有关她本身物品的索偿诉讼,以及级律审裁庭官司仍在持续。巴蒂今早回国,是没有携带之前被警方扣押的所有品的。 她指警方声称这是因为有其他“利益相关者”也索取有关物品。当然这些物品就是巴蒂此前所面对偷窃控状中,被指从雇主那里偷窃的赃物,例如黑裙、二手茶壶、二手刀和筷子等。…