Singapore continues its descent at the World Press Freedom ranking in 2021, dropping from 158 to 160.

The index by Reporters Without Borders (RSF) is a barometer that gives an annual ranking of countries based on the organisation’s assessment of the press freedom records of those countries, which is based on several categories including media independence, legislative framework, abuses against the media/reporters, infrastructure, and more.

Singapore has consistently ranked poorly on this index for the past few years. The city-state dropped to 158 in the last ranking from 151 in 2019 – a position that is below countries such as Russia, Thailand, and Indonesia.

In its ranking last year, RSF noted that Singapore had its colour on the Index changed to black, which signifies that the situation in the country is classified as “very bad”.

The color index remains in this year’s ranking.

”Despite the ‘Switzerland of the East’ label often used in Singapore government propaganda, the city-state does not fall far short of China when it comes to suppressing media freedom,” RSF explained.

Reasons for the ranking

  • Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s government is always quick to sue critical journalists, apply pressure to make them unemployable, or even force them to leave the country.
  • The Media Development Authority has the power to censor all forms of journalistic content.
  • Defamation suits are common and may sometimes be accompanied by a sedition charge that is punishable by up to 21 years in prison.
  • The political control is coupled with an economic straitjacket. Two business groups control all of Singapore’s print and broadcast media. One, MediaCorp, is owned by a state investment company. The other, Singapore Press Holdings, is supposedly privately-owned but the Government appoints those who run it. As a result, self-censorship is widespread, including within the alternative independent media, which are intimidated by the judicial and economic pressure. The red lines imposed by the authorities, known by Singapore’s journalists as “OB markers” (for out-of-bounds markers), apply to an ever-wider range of issues and public figures. The authorities have also started sending journalists emails threatening them with up to 20 years in prison if they don’t remove annoying articles and fall into line.
  • The Orwellian provisions of the “anti-fake news” law, “Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act” (POFMA) adopted in 2019 forces all media outlets and digital platforms to post “corrections” to any content that the Government may arbitrarily deem to be “incorrect”. This censorship bureau 2.0 has enabled the Government to impose its own version on a range of subjects including the death penalty, the salary paid to the prime minister’s wife, and its handling of the COVID-19 crisis.

Singapore’s neighbouring countries, Malaysia, ranked 119 on the index, saw a steep drop of 18 positions from its previous ranking, while Indonesia, at 113, saw an improvement of 6 from its previous year’s ranking.

Top 40 countries in the World Press Ranking

Subscribe
Notify of
61 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Face to Face Videos: The Economy

The Face to Face forum brought together the leaders and representatives of…

战备军人个人体测再延一个月

国防部发出通知,战备军人的个人体能测验(IPPT)措施将再延后一个月。 当局昨日(8月5日)向战备军人发出手机简讯通知,指武装部队体能训练中心和战备军人协会健身房实施的个人体能测验、个人体能预备训练和体能补训,以及公园预备训练,都将持续暂停,直到下个月30日。 国防部今年6月宣布,自3月份因冠状病毒疫情19影响而叫停的个人体能测验等措施,都将展延到这个月31日。然而此次因为冠毒疫情情况未明朗,所以将继续展延一个月,直到9月30日。 当局指出,会继续观察,并依据疫情情况进行调整,以确保战备军人的安全获得保障。 简讯中也指出,原定于这期间进行个人体能测验的战备军人,将获得一次性豁免,而最新消息将会在下月30日前,透过邮件信函或网站进行公布。

Cherian George: A code of ethics for Internet readers?

~ By Cherian George ~ Singapore sometimes seems like a metropolis in search of…

国大95亿元! 三大学拥数十亿储备金惹议

新加坡3所大学在去年捐款排行榜上因为拥有数十亿的储备金,虽不是新鲜事,却也引起民众争议。 昨日(7月28日)《海峡时报星期刊》报导,指新加坡国立大学坐拥95亿储备金,在去年3月底结束的财政年度中,收到2亿2700万元捐款,并赚取6亿200元的投资收入,成为我国最成功的筹款机构。 最成功10大募款机构,榜上有名的还有另外两间大学,分别是位居第四,拥有37亿储备金的南洋理工大学(NTU)和第九,拥有12亿元的新加坡科技设计大学(SUTD)。 捐款和投资方面,南大所获得的捐款为5000万元以及1亿4900元,而科技设计大学则拥有2700万元和6600万元。 其它上榜单位还包括了新造教会、国家福利理事会慈善基金、城市丰收教会和观音堂佛祖庙等。 大学算慈善机构? 此报道引起民众关注,一名45岁的社工读者(魏辰德)致函该报,对大学性质表示质疑,不解为何该机构能被归纳为慈善机构,并且与了解相关大学任何管理显著的储备金。 他质疑既然拥有大量储备金,不明白大学还需要捐款者捐献的原因。“慈善捐款的饼就这么大,如果拿下一大块,就意味着留给其他慈善机构的就不多了。到底捐款和储备金,要多少才算足够?” 针对质疑,国大发言人指出,该大学利用储备金赚取投资收入,用于资助不同的运作费,如奖学金、支持研究和推广企业化。 她指出,大学需要继续筹款让储备金处于健康水平,才能加强长期的财务可持续性。 国大募款事宜职员50人 而根据《海时》报导,仅仅国大发展办公处负责募款事宜的职员就有50人,而国大未透露有多少募款志工。…