Still image taken from video shows New Zealand’s Minister For Public Service Chris Hipkins talking to the media in Wellington, New Zealand December 16, 2020. TVNZ/Reuters TV/via REUTERS

It was reported in the NZ media last Wed (31 Mar) that the New Zealand government is presently considering if pre-departure COVID-19 testing results from India can be trusted.

It came after a spate of COVID-19 cases on a weekend flight arriving in NZ on 27 Mar from India via Dubai. Twelve cases were found in the flight. There were also additional eight cases recorded in the previous week after arriving at NZ via the same journey.

Christopher Hipkins, the NZ Minister assigned for COVID-19 Response, told the media, “We are seeing quite a few cases coming through that (India-Dubai route). It’s an Emirates flight that tends to bring a lot of people from India. We do see quite a high concentration of cases from that.”

“It’s obviously coming from a country where Covid-19 is rampant,” he said.

Hipkins added that he was getting advice with regard to the testing regime in India, but said the pre-departure testing rules which require people to get tested 72 hours before departing for NZ were not a “failsafe”.

“I am getting some advice on the pre-departure testing, whether or not we have full confidence in the test results or whether there is any evidence that system is being abused,” he said.

“It’s important to remember though that pre-departure testing is not a failsafe, 72 hours before departure is the timeframe we give somebody, it is still possible to contract Covid and get a positive test result by the time you arrive in New Zealand bearing in mind that if you’re travelling a long way there’s another 24 hours.”

“The fact that we’re seeing a reasonably significant proportion of cases coming through that particular travel path testing positive either in day 0 or day three, that doesn’t in itself tell us that pre-departure testing isn’t performing as it should.”

However, he said that the NZ government would not look at limiting or capping returnees from any region even if case numbers from that region were high.

 

 

Subscribe
Notify of
24 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

4G Leadership display the misguided arrogance that is built not on their own efforts but on the efforts of those that have come before.

Finance Minister Heng Swee Keat (Heng) may have denounced Oxfam’s findings that…

新捷运总裁颜睿杰因“个人失检”辞职

新捷运集团已向媒体证实,总裁颜睿杰已提呈辞职信。 各大媒体也竞相报导此消息。根据《海峡时报》报导,61岁的新捷运总裁颜睿杰,为其“个人失检”(personal indiscretion)行为负上责任,突然宣布辞职。 新捷运晚间向新加坡交易所发出通知,指颜睿杰将辞去职务,明年3月27日正式离职。 集团主席林日波称,颜睿杰是在今早向他呈辞,并为自己的行为深表歉意。 “颜睿杰已为他行为上的疏忽承担所有责任,董事会也以已经接受他的辞职。我们失去了一名为新加坡陆路交通付出不少的良好总裁。” 61岁的颜睿杰从2010年开始出任新捷运总裁。新捷运的股价在消息公布前,下跌0.02元,收市报2.70元。 颜睿杰在本月12日抛售了2万7300支新捷运股,在26日再抛出1万5000股。他持有3万支公司股票和15万认股期权。 颜睿杰曾任武装部队高职 曾在新加坡武装部队担任多项指挥及军事参谋的高级职务,颜睿杰于 2010 年…

【诽谤诉讼】林鼎指责总理不敢起诉弟妹 质问谁让已故李光耀相信故居将被保留?

李显龙总理起诉本社总编许渊臣诽谤案,控辩双方在大年初四(本月15日)进行口头辩论。 只因一篇文章中,复述了总理弟妹李玮玲和李显扬的指控,总理李显龙提告本社总编许渊臣诽谤。诉讼在去年11月30日进行,一直持续到12月3日。在昨日法官聆听诉辩双方结束陈词,将给予两周时间提呈补充资料,并保留裁决。 许渊臣的代表律师是林鼎,昨日在庭上质问控方,若不是总理李显龙提及,又是谁让已故建国总理李光耀,相信欧思礼38号故居可能被宪报保留为古迹? “如果不是总理,又会是谁让他(李光耀)产生这个印象?(故居将保留)?” 林鼎昨日在庭上分析,这绝不是李显扬和李玮玲会这么告知父亲,因为他们都支持拆除故居;即便李光耀生前的私人律师柯金梨也不会,因为她坦言曾两度查找欧思礼路38号故居,是否已被宪报为古迹。 林鼎也再次提及去年审讯时抛出的疑点,是否总理与夫人有意迁入故居(去年总理曾在庭上强调,若故居被保留的一些考量,包括出租,或自己先住上一段时间,直到其敏感性降低,或房子被拆除)。 林鼎也再次指责总理“没有勇气”提控自己的弟妹,因为弟妹们拥有他不愿在庭上被公开揭露的文件。 他认为,对许渊臣的诉讼,就像总理对时评人梁实轩的官司一样,是一场“代理官司”(surrogate litigation);也抨击总理发起的官司浪费时间,且毫无必要。 他指出,涉案文章仅仅是复述了总理弟妹早前已公开的指控,也无证据能说明, 总理为此蒙受损失。但文达星则重提,总理早前接受盘问时,已表达本身的信任、信誉和尊重蒙受损失。 更何况,网友们的讨论,多围绕在何晶在社交媒体转发帖文的行为,和具诽谤性内容毫无关系。…

5 Singaporeans on Japan cruise ship allowed to disembark, will remain in Japan for 14 days before returning

After two weeks of quarantine, the five Singaporeans who were on the…