Human rights lawyer M Ravi took to Facebook on Wednesday (14 October) to voice his displeasure towards the police for arresting a woman in public after she allegedly poured soup on a stranger at Novena Square mall.

Calling the arrest “totally unacceptable”, Mr Ravi said that it’s a serious offence to unlawfully handcuff someone in public, especially if such an arrest is declared unlawful by the court.

“To handcuff someone unlawfully in public is a serious offence if such arrest is declared by the court as unlawful. It also attracts criminal penalty of false imprisonment and battery,” the lawyer said.

He added, “From what I see, this arrest is totally unacceptable”.

Mr Ravi is referring to a recent incident that happened at Novena Square mall when a 35-year-old woman was arrested by police officers for pouring soup on a random stranger’s head and scuffled with him.

In a statement released on Wednesday, the police said that she was arrested under the Mental Health (Care and Treatment) Act and is under investigation for voluntarily causing hurt as well as using criminal force to stop a public servant from performing his duties.

This incident came to public knowledge after a one-minute video of the police encounter went viral on social media and networking platforms like Facebook, TikTok and LinkedIn on Tuesday and Wednesday.

In the video, four police officers—three male and one female—were shown standing around the woman who was speaking to them. Another two officers were seen having a word with an unidentified man a few metres away from the woman.

After a while, one of the four officers who were surrounding the woman suddenly grabbed her right arm, and the other officers placed handcuffs on her, before taking her away.

Following that, the woman can be heard shouting to the officers in the video saying, “This is against human rights. Why is this necessary?”

In response to this, Mr Ravi said in his post that the woman is “essentially asking where is her human rights”.

In fact, the lawyer noted that he hopes this matter is brought up in Parliament, adding that his other colleagues from different countries are shocked looking at the arrest.

“My colleagues from other countries including our neighbours are shocked at the manner in which these police officers effected the arrest which is very handed when they literally armtwisted her. And why even arrest this poor lady for Godsake!!” he explained.

Woman receiving treatment at Institute of Mental Health

In its statement on Wednesday, the police stated that it responded to a call for assistance at Novena Square at 4.24pm after the woman shouted at a random man in a restaurant.

It added that she allegedly poured a bowl of soup on the 32-year-old man, and a scuffle ensued. The woman then spat at the man and bit his right arm. This resulted in the man being taken to Tan Tock Seng Hospital.

The police also highlighted that when the officers spoke to her at the mall, she continued to shout “incoherently”. He relative, who was present at the scene, was not able to calm her down.

It added that she was deemed to pose a danger to herself and the public, and was then arrested.

“The woman is also being investigated for voluntarily causing hurt and using criminal force to deter a public servant from carrying out his duties. She had hurled verbal abuse and also spat on the officers in the process,” the police said.

Currently, the woman is receiving treatment at the Institute of Mental Health, the police added.

Subscribe
Notify of
36 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

李玮玲炮轰一再重复总理不实指控 官媒只字不提

日前,总理妹妹李玮玲炮轰,本地一家主流媒体一再重复其哥哥李显龙对李显扬的“不实且可耻的指控”。 他在其脸书也驳斥,指李显扬涉及诈欺父亲以在遗嘱中获得更多份额的说法, “根本就是说谎”,不过李玮玲未指名道姓是哪家媒体的报导。 不过,李玮玲的指责,似乎“有迹可循”。本月9日,《海峡时报》跟进林学芬诉讼一案,提到律师公会聘请高级律师暨WongPartnership副主席陈志明来处理此案,意味着陈志明将与为林学芬辩护的前总检察长温长明对决公堂。 《海时》的这篇报导也提及,总检察署在今年一月投诉到律师公会,质疑林学芬作为专业律师,在为李光耀准备最终遗嘱一事,有失职之嫌的表面证据。他的丈夫李显扬也是遗嘱的受益人。 “李显扬在最终遗嘱的份额有提升。”报导续称,李显扬称林学芬从未担任父亲律师,最终遗嘱有柯金梨负责,但后者已否认。 然而,《海时》的报导却没有注明,所谓“李显扬的份额提升”的论点,是否来自总检察署的指控。(事实上,这是来自李显龙总理在2017年代宣誓声明中,在他的前律师黄鲁胜建议下,作出的指控。) 在2017年成立的部长委员会,李显龙的宣誓声明指责,林学芬有份参与最终遗嘱的拟定。李显龙直指,弟媳林学芬身为利害关係人,直接参与遗嘱的订立“耐人寻味”,並且“似乎涉及利益衝突”。 对此,李玮玲在其个人脸书透露,2012年,父亲确有打算在遗嘱中分给他较多的份额,但是在2013年,又重新回归到公平分配的决定。 根据李玮玲的说法,柯金梨在2015年6月,曾致函给他们三位兄妹,指出父亲同意把所有遗产平分给三位子女。“最终遗嘱如此确定。我们拿到平分的遗产,不多也不少。” 有趣的是,一直都有跟进欧思礼路故居议题和总理家族纠纷的官方媒体,不论是《海峡时报》、新传媒还是《今日报》,似乎选择性地忽略掉李玮玲的贴文,官媒报导只字不提后者做出的反驳。

A tale of two rallies and Opposition solidarity

~ By Kenneth Jeyaretnam ~ Saturday night I stood in the historic field where…

Workers’ rights “chopped away”: former NTUC financial consultants

By Andrew Loh –  The High Court has reserved judgement in the…