When a publisher in Singapore has voluntarily recalled a “problematic book” from retail stores over readers’ complaints about its racist sentiments, this was called as “cancel culture”, what about the minorities who were interrogated by authorities for calling out racism?

Kirsten Han, a Singaporean activist and freelance journalist, had raised this question on her Facebook account yesterday (21 July), while referring to the Mothership.sg Facebook post captioned with “cancel culture” – which the caption was changed shortly after.

The post was referring to publisher Marshall Cavendish Education (MCE), which has apologized to its readers after several complaints were made against its Chinese-language children’s book for racism.

The book, which written by Wu Xing Hua, depicts a “dark-skinned” boy with “oily curly hair” named Mao Mao – which means “hairy” in Chinese – whose characterized as an aggressive school bully.

One netizen, who is using the moniker Umm Yusof, made the first complaint about the book on 17 July asking the rationale of publishing the book as it seems to portray the dark-skinned boy as “irredeemably nasty”, despite his appearance is irrelevant to the plot.

A few days later on 21 July, MCE apologised on Facebook and said that it will cease the sale and distribution of the Amazing Adventures of Pi Pi series – which consists of five books – and recall the copies of the book from retail stores.

In reference to that, Ms Han asked: “A publisher voluntarily (ie. no investigation, no charges, no lawsuit) recalling a problematic book before it hurts their branding further = [is called] ‘cancel culture’?”

“Where were these concerns about ‘cancel culture’ when minorities were getting reported, interrogated, and issued warnings for calling out racism and expressing anger over the crap they’ve had to put up with for years?” she added.

Ms Han also brought up about the rap video by Youtuber Preeti Nair – well known as Preetipls – and Subhas Nair that became the subject of investigations for its allegedly offensive content last year.

“Then what do you call the authorities *compelling* Preetipls, Subhas Nair, and other Singaporeans to remove a rap video? Plus the subsequent erasure of Subhas and his work with migrant workers (unrelated to the police investigation) from a CNA production?” said the activist.

In 2019, Preetipls and Subhas Nair posted a three-minute rap video in response to a controversial advertisement by NETS promoting E-Pay. The ad featured Chinese actor Dennis Chew who dressed up as four characters of different races, and his skin was made up to look darker.

The Nair siblings’ video was condemned by Law and Home Affairs Minister K Shanmugam, saying that the video had “crossed the line” because it contained vulgarities directed at Chinese Singaporean and could turn minorities against the majority community.

The video was also investigated by police for “offensive content that causes ill-will between races”, while authorities have ordered for the video to be taken down from the online platforms.

It was reported that Mr Subhas was also removed from CNA‘s musical documentary which titled ROAR, due to his involvement in the rap video.

Subscribe
Notify of
4 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Best place to live in but how many are leaving?

Best for expats but why how many S’poreans are leaving? By Leong Sze Hian.

对韩咏梅公开信 事主柯政杰提数点反驳

日前,《联合早报》一篇报导《阻断措施期间足不出户 南大生不解为何染疫》,引起事主公开在脸书非议,并没有授权记者使用他的个人资料和照片,也未同意受访。 对此,《联合早报》总编辑韩咏梅也在今日(13日)发表致读者公开信,提及记者违反工作原则,也向事主致歉。 柯政杰在最新的贴文,先是感谢《联合早报》总编辑韩咏梅透过公开信回应。但他也对韩咏梅在信中的一些说法作出反驳。 信中,韩咏梅分享政杰分享的一帧社交媒体贴文,声称该报报导并非虚构,而是而是根据柯先生的社交媒体贴文所写。 这则帖文中柯政杰提及“自己即时“在家”还是确诊了”。但政杰指出,不论是有关记者还是报业控股,都没人向他求证这句话的意思,而他澄清自己所指“在家”,是指遵循阻断措施,停止一些非必要的外部接触。 但《联合早报》却指当事人“足不出户”,且不解为何还确诊。 柯政杰也列出列表,对比记者的报导和事实: 记者的报导 事实 记者称政杰只前往小贩中心打包就回家 以及去过学校…

网民见惊人一幕 电箱成蟒蛇藏身处

蟒蛇在我国并不少见,但是你曾看过蟒蛇藏身在电箱内吗? 网民Yan Thomas周一(8月24日)在脸书群组Nature Society(Singapore)发帖指出,她于当天中午11时50分经过东陵路,等待交通灯转绿时,看见三名技术人员站在电箱旁边,以为他们在修理电箱的变压器(DB),却不想看到了惊人的一幕。 据网民所分享的照片,一条蟒蛇藏身在电箱内,且看起来并不小只哦。 不上网民在评论区留言,指蛇是冷血动物,会寻找温暖的地方取暖,所以有时会出现在意想不到的地方,而这条蟒蛇应该认为电箱就是它的温暖窝吧!  

“无法相信所听见的事实“ 红娘公司创办人分享确诊心路历程

在疫情肆虐之际,患者数不断攀升,但每一数字都代表着一位患者,而每一位患者身上都拥有自己的故事,而我们从不了解,他们自发生症状起至被检测送入医院时,到底带着什么样的心情故事。今天就带大家来了解,患者在入院到底曾经历过什么? 是的,我就是第667号患者,这并不是迟来的四月一号愚人节。 日前,一名网友Violet Lim(林笑岏)披露自己从发现症状、接受冠状病毒19检测,结果呈阳性反应的历程。 也是红娘公司Lunch Actually创办人的她,忆述在3月25日凌晨2点时,突然醒来感觉到头痛,胸口也开始有一股无法形容的胸闷。于是她从床上爬起来到她5米远的地方拿水杯,突然感觉到呼吸急促,但不是一般的气喘,却感觉到呼吸有点困难。 “第一反应是,天啊,这不是冠状病毒19的症状吗?” 林笑岏开始忆述,自己在疫情爆发时都相当谨慎,例如定期消毒和勤洗手、不去拥挤的地方,甚至为了避免大规模感染,她也取消了自己的生日宴。 而且自2月中旬,公司也安排了室内和室外的团队进行工作,而他也属于室外的团队,所以自2月份起,就没有在回到公司,或是遇到任何客户或同事,即指感染的机会较少。 根据卫生部的资料,第667例曾到过美国,属入境病例。 林笑岏在带着各种担心与忧虑下,她决定在隔日早晨去到综合诊所求诊。她也向医生老实交代了个人旅行史后,医生也立即为她开转介信到国家传染病中心。 鼻拭子检测时最痛苦,但医生护士积极乐观对待病人…