“Democracy in Singapore will have a sad day if all the alternative parties are wiped out in this election with no alternative [constituency Member of Parliament] in Parliament,” said Progress Singapore Party (PSP) assistant secretary general Leong Mun Wai on Facebook on Tuesday (7 July).

In a post, Mr Leong—who is contesting at West Coast GRC with four other PSP candidates— said it is “surprising” that the possibility of PAP losing power is still being raised as a factor in this general election.

Mr Leong wrote, “I can assure you (and willing to bet a million for one odds) that the PAP will still form the government after the polling day on Jul 10.”

“It is not a reckless statement or impulsive bet. It is justified and backed by facts from history, theory and practice,” he asserted.

Mr Leong went on to talk about the “first-pass-the-post” (FPTP) electoral system in Singapore which “only elects the winner who needs to garner only 50% plus one votes.”

Mr Leong said, “So theoretically, for a party which forms a government with a simple majority of Parliament only need to win 51% of the seats with 50% of the votes of each constituency. This means that party only needs 25% (51 x 50) of the votes to form a government!”

A major disadvantage for voters under this system is that “the other more than 49% of voters” who voted for the opposition are “ignored”, he emphasised.

“The FPTP system favours the larger parties who have strong ground operations to garner support from the local residents. And they only need to be entrenched in 51% of the seats or constituencies and they can form the government again and again,” Mr Leong elaborated.

He went on, “Our PAP government is a super-entrenched government with its 60 years of rule and good track record in the early years of nationhood.”

“Actually they do not need to do the gerrymandering and unfair practices and they will still easily get an absolute majority,” added the PSP assistant general.

Noting the group representation system which “further cemented” this “theoretical advantage”, Mr Leong gave the example of the 1963 general election where the People’s Action Party (PAP) won 73 percent of the votes with 47 percent of the vote shared.

“Hence there is no proportional relationship between the number of seats and the vote share,” he pointed out.

“And since 1968, there has been a consistently 30% to 40% of opposition vote, but the opposition share of the seats is at best 7%.”

Mr Leong concluded, “As a result, there is absolutely no doubt that the PAP will form the next government again. This should not be an issue at all.”

The politician went on to lament that the raising of this “fear factor” together with the issue of the Non-Constituency Member of Parliament (NCMP) scheme is “an attempt to confuse the voters and distract them from casting the vote for the alternative camp”.

Mr Leong urged voters not to lose sight of “our objective” to secure 32 seats for the alternative front in the new parliament.

“There can only be an effective voice if the alternative parties enter Parliament as full MPs or Constituency Member of Parliament (CMP),” he emphasised, adding that it is a sad day for democracy in Singapore if all alternative political parties are “wiped out” in this election with no alternative CMPs in parliament.

Subscribe
Notify of
11 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

解封第三阶段是否放宽工作场所限制? 杨莉明卖关子

随着总理李显龙在周一宣布,本月28日新加坡将进入解封第三阶段,工作场所是否会放宽限制?打工族是否还能继续居家办公也引起关注。 人力部长杨莉明,在昨日接受媒体访问时,表示抗疫跨部门工作小组早前已探讨,是否工作场所可进一步放宽。 不过具体工作场所限制的调整,仍未有透露详情,她仅表示“不久的将来会有一些宣布,大家还须再耐心等待一会儿。” 相信上述检讨也包括,是否允许更多雇员返回工作场所办公,或是要求雇主作出灵活工作时间安排,错开上班高峰时间通勤。 自冠状病毒19疫情爆发后,很多公司都让员工采用居家办公的模式进行日常运作。有者自阻断措施以来,已居家工作近半年。 今年六月民调:六成雇员想居家工作 今年六月,管理公司Qualtrics,就邀请511名新加坡人,进行了“复工民意调查”。就有近六成受访民众称,不愿意回到自己的工作场所。不过,他们也希望雇主能在工作场所采取防疫措施。 解封第三阶段放宽的措施包括:允许八人群聚、宗教集会及仪式人数上限,可从目前100人放宽至250人等等。  

“人协未涉及裕廊SAFRA歌唱班晚宴” 陈振声向林鼎等三人发更正指示

人民协会副主席陈振声,透过防假消息法(POFMA Office),向人民之声党领袖林鼎等人发出更正指示。 根据该办事处文告,包括林鼎、脸书用户“HenryaceAce”、“Sebastian Ying”以及林鼎等三人,分享贴文误指上月15日在裕廊SAFRA举行的歌唱班团拜晚宴,人民协会或居民委员会(RC)涉及其中。 对此人协副主席陈振声透过该办事处对上述三人发出更正指示。政府网站Factually则澄清,人协和居委会并没有涉及在裕廊SAFRA的晚宴,也没有涉及赞助、筹办或赞助该晚宴,更无权取消之。反之,晚宴是由歌唱导师为他的歌唱班成员举办的。 截至昨日,在裕廊SAFRA的晚宴感染群累计47起病例。2月15日当晚有两场团拜晚宴,共600人出席。主办方也表示并未检测出任何感冒症状或曾出入中国的访客。然而防不胜防,仍出现确诊病例,就连歌唱导师梁凤艺也确诊。 歌唱班晚宴爆发感染群  政府宣布人协部分课程 根据《联合早报》报导,这迫使政府在本月7日宣布,由于上述感染群与人协属下,多个民众俱乐部和居委会的歌唱活动有关,人协采取额外防疫措施,避免病毒进一步传播。受影响的七个民众俱乐部及八个居委会,凡是确诊病例参加过的所有活动和课程都暂停14天。

林鼎本周六办“新加坡问责制怎么了?”集会

人民之声党创办人林鼎,将在本周六(16日)下午4时至7时,于芳林公园举办“新加坡的问责制怎么了?”集会。 林鼎昨日在脸书发文,欢迎民众踊跃出席。根据其贴文的资讯,有关集会将谈及对政治领袖和公职者的问责制,强调缺乏问责的政府代价是巨大的。 林鼎质问,人民必须对自己的生活、学业和工作负责。如果表现不好或失当,也会被骂、被惩罚和开除。然而, 政府要员做错事,却没有人需要出来负责、没人因此引咎辞职。现有政策只是为了保护他们的不足和失策。 他质问,何以国民服役事故频发,黄永宏仍是国防部长;出现医疗个资和艾滋病患个资泄露、C型肝炎感染事件,颜金勇还能继续当卫生部长。 “为何不归还您的公积金积蓄?回酬又少得可怜?公积金政策怎么朝令夕改?再者,国人的就业集会拱手让给外籍人士。” 林鼎说,这些问题显示我国施政缺乏问责,国人应该向政治领导追究责任,因为社会的维系需要相互的关怀和负责行为,只有加强问责才能避免一再陷入失误。 “我们的政府要员薪酬全球最高,他们理应对纳税人负责。”