HONG KONG – JULY 7 2019: Hong Kong Protesters marching along the famous tourist spot Nathan Road against the controversial Extradition Bills that allow govt to send people to mainland China for trial (Photo by Lo Kin-hei from Shutterstock).

by Jerome Taylor

Torn up paving stones filled-in with concrete, cages erected over bridges and security guards on campus entrances — protests have left a permanent imprint on Hong Kong’s streets after a year of tumult.

One year ago, on June 9, a record-breaking crowd of some one million marched through the international finance hub demanding the withdrawal of an unpopular bill allowing extraditions to the authoritarian mainland.

As city leaders dug in, the movement snowballed into a popular revolt against Beijing’s rule with huge rallies and clashes with police raging for seven straight months.

Mass arrests and a coronavirus ban on public gatherings have enforced calm for much of this year and Beijing is now planning to impose a new law for the finance hub targeting subversion, secession, terrorism and foreign interference.

But signs of the unrest can still be seen throughout the metropolis.

Hong Kong Polytechnic University was the scene of the most sustained clashes between protesters and police back in November.

Now the imposing red brick campus is ringed by yellow water-filled security barriers and guards who check the identities of those entering.

Similar barriers have been thrown up around Hong Kong’s legislature, neighbourhood police stations, government ministries and Beijing’s offices in the city.

Police now rarely patrol in less than groups of four, some swapping their blue uniforms for green riot overalls and helmets.

Many Chinese owned companies and businesses deemed sympathetic to Beijing have kept the wooden protective hoarding over their storefronts after dozens of shops were trashed by protesters.

‘Ideas are indestructible’

All across the city, paving that was dug up to throw at police or delay their advances have been filled in with concrete, some of it daubed with anti-government slogans before it had time to dry.

And many pedestrian bridges over busy roads are clad in metal cages after protesters disrupted highways by throwing objects from above.

“Throughout the 2019 protests, protesters ‘deconstructed’ the city’s fabric, subverting the urban infrastructure to put it in service of their protest,” Antony Dapiran, a Hong Kong lawyer who has written books about the city’s protest movements, told AFP.

“The Hong Kong government, when it became familiar with the protesters’ tactics, begun to take countermeasures, stripping the city of the urban hardware that the protesters so readily recontextualised for the purposes of their barricade resistance,” he added.

Some of that hardware has begun returning.

For months, streets were largely stripped of metal security barriers separating the busy roads from the pavements.

Protesters became expert at using wrenches and drills to dismantle the structures in seconds to add to their barricades.

But in recent weeks, new barriers have sprung up, their shiny metal frames yet to be weathered by the sub-tropical heat.

So-called “Lennon Walls” — filled with pro-democracy posters and colourful notes — remain standing in some neighbourhoods where anti-government sentiment runs high.

Others have been scrubbed down and painted over, often by municipal workers playing whack-a-mole with the graffiti, others by gangs of pro-government supporters.

But Dapiran said scrubbing people’s memories will be much harder.

“The Lennon Wall was transformed from a site to an idea, an instrument and expression of protest, and became as a result significantly more powerful and enduring — and, ultimately, indestructible,” he said.

– AFP

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Dr Yaacob’s incorrect and embarrassing New Zealand comparison

By Choo Zheng Xi/Co-Founder, TOC This morning, my eyes nearly popped out…

Will others emulate Dr Toh?

~by: Tan Jee Say~ My memories of close encounters with Dr Toh…

不参与《暴力与骚扰公约2019》表决 杨莉明:纳入家暴超出职场范围

虽然我国认同制定反对职场暴力和骚扰的全球性条约,不过人力部长杨莉明解释,考量到《暴力与骚扰公约2019》“超越职场范围”,因此在联合国属下的国际劳工组织(ILO)于今年6月召开的常年会议中,放弃表决权。 她在国会上发言时,提到劳工组织将如何实施后来通过的新公约,其中包括将家庭暴力纳入职场风险评估范围。 “这将把职场安全远远拓展超出职场范围” 。她在回应有关我国就签署《暴力与骚扰公约2019》表决上弃权一事,作出回应。 在劳工组织于6月21日在瑞士日内瓦召开常年会议时,召集成员国的劳资政代表,就相关公约进行表决,而包括我国在内的六个国家都选择投出弃权票。除了我国,其他的五个国家为俄罗斯、萨尔瓦多、马来西亚、巴拉圭以及吉尔吉斯斯坦。 官委议员王丽婷在国会上询问我国代表团是如何做出投票决定时,杨莉明表示新加坡全国雇主联合会(SNEF)严重关切有关的公约内容,并且对有关条约持有反对意见。 代表工人群体的全国职工总会,尽管清楚知道政府将放弃表决,惟仍投下赞成票以展现对公约的精神支持。 杨莉明表示我国严肃看待条约表决义务,并且我国长期以来的政策都是只考虑通过或批准符合我国利益,且条约法律和政策可完全遵循的公约。 “对于有疑问的部分,我们将继续探讨。” “与此同时,如果符合我们的目标,在符合公约精神下,我们将改进政策和措施。” 她也以劳工组织的《职业安全卫生公约》为例,在有关国际协议于6月份批准之前,我国已经采取并加强措施,成功降低职场的死亡率。 持续打击职场暴力骚扰…

HDB extends suspension of late payment charges on mortgage arrears till 31 March, 2021

In order to help ease the burden of the people of Singapore,…