Over the last three year, about 80 breaches were found committed by migrant worker dormitory operators at purpose-built dormitories annually, the Ministry of Manpower (MOM) said on Wednesday (3 June).

The majority of the breaches—60 percent—were for “minor lapses” like not maintaining good hygiene and tidiness in one part of the dormitory, MOM said in a report by Channel News Asia.

In fact, out of the 43 FEDA-licensed migrant worker dorms in Singapore, about 20 of them have breached licensing condition every year, Manpower Minister Josephine Teo revealed in Parliament early last month.

“As MOM takes action even for minor breaches, it should not be surprising that slightly under half of the entities have previously breached a licensing condition,” a spokesperson from MOM noted.

The spokesperson added, “In all cases, the operators and employers were asked to rectify the lapses immediately. MOM followed up with inspections to ensure the rectifications were satisfactory.”

In the recent months, migrant worker dormitories have come under fire for its poor, unsanitary and overly-crammed living conditions. This in fact has led to a spike in COVID-19 cases in Singapore, contributing to over 90 percent of the country’s total cases.

However, MOM did not mention anything about whether any dormitories were checked or penalised for lacking quarantine requirements and medical facilities.

Action taken on over 1,200 employers

Over the last three years, MOM said that it took action against an average of 1,200 employers annually as they failed to provide acceptable living space for the migrant workers.

The offence that is mostly committed involve placing workers in overcrowded units or in unsanitary conditions, the Ministry said.

Besides that, the Singapore Civil Defence Force (SCDF) found 150 fire safety infringements committed at purpose-built and factory-converted dorms in the last three years, said an SCDF spokesman to the Straits Times.

The infringements were discovered during the 362 inspections SCDF carried out at these dorms.

Out of these infringements, 143 of them ended up in composition fines. Of those, seven were serious ones that resulted in court action, like unauthorised fire safety works involving the erection of partition walls.

Based on the Foreign Employee Dormitories Act (FEDA), dorm operators who defy the rules can be fined up to S$50,000, jailed for up to a year, or both.

However, if the offences were committed across the dormitory, or are repeated, then the operators could face a fine up to S$50,000.

But, in “egregious cases” where the dorm operator blatantly “disregard” to welfare of the workers, the Ministry will prosecute the operator.

One such incident happened to dormitory operator Labourtel Management and its director Parvis Ahamed Mohaamed Ghouse in July last year. They were charged after a number of dormitories were found to have “filthy and unacceptable” living conditions. They were the first to be prosecuted under FEDA and pleaded guilty in March this year.

MOM also inspected employers who house workers on their own.

“In addition to imposing a fine of up to S$20,000 on these employers, MOM will withdraw their work pass privileges and bar them from hiring foreign workers,” the spokesperson said.

New dormitories with improved standards

As the number of COVID-19 cases were mostly recorded in migrant worker dorms, Ms Teo said that the Government will “look into areas where we could have done better, so that we will be better prepared the next time”.

On Monday, in a joint statement released by the Ministry of National Development and MOM, it was announced that the Government will build new migrant worker dormitories and relocate some workers to unused state properties, as part of its plans to reduce the current density in the dormitories.

Around 60,000 workers will be placed in temporary sites like New Quick Build Dormitories by the end of this year. For the long term, the authorities will construct new purpose-built dorms in the next few years to accommodate up to 100,000 workers.

“This new building programme will take several years to complete, but we aim to have about 11 such new PBDs ready over the next one to two years.  All of these PBDs will have amenities like minimarts, barber services, indoor recreation facilities and will have blocks well spaced out to ensure good ventilation. Workers living in the PBDs will also have ready access to medical care and support,” the statement read.

It added, “With these additional PBDs in place, we will also have the capacity to decant workers from the existing dormitories, and to undertake major upgrading to these dormitories to ensure that they meet the new standards.”

The Government agencies are also developing a set of specifications for these new dormitories, and some of the criteria focused on include design, facilities, management and regulation of these dormitories, as well as social interaction and disease response needs.

Subscribe
Notify of
7 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

National Cybercrime Action Plan unveiled at RSA Conference

In the effort to fight cybercrime, Home Affairs and Law Minister K Shanmugam…

是什么样的领导,会选择抗疫时刻暗示要大选?

原文:维权律师张素兰 在看了本周日(15日),国家发展部长黄循财在记者会上的讲话,以及外交部长维文本月11日接受CNBC电视台的访谈,我感到很愤怒— 但不是生气这些部长,而是总理。 选区范围检讨委会上周出炉后,我国总理李显龙就在隔日(14日)在脸书发文写道: “我们有两种选择,要么期望疫情能在本届政府任期结束前就稳定下来。如此我们得以在正常情况下举行选举– 但对此我们无法确定。 又或者我们提早召开选举,既然知道我们将进入飓风,那么选出全新获委托和任期的新政府,可以与国人携手应对当前严峻事务… …。” 总理干嘛在这时暗示选举呢? 看看黄循财和维文,已经为了防堵疫情劳心劳力。 那些仍滞留国外重灾区、需要带回家的国人,他们要为他们的安全着想;他们担忧疫情对经济的冲击,想法设法减少对商业和国人生活的冲击。他们要顾虑我们的医疗系统是否能应付增长的病例、考量是否要关闭学府等,他们也落实边境管制。 看看他们疲惫和焦虑的脸吧。当记者询及总理要挟将提早举行大选时,维文和黄循财都避开了这问题。黄循财说当前他无暇去想选举的事,“选举并非当务之急。”他们都在应对一场全球疫情,也决意要防堵之。…

女灾黎与死神搏斗逾月离世 武吉巴督火灾水管不出水谁该问责?

上月1日凌晨,武吉巴督21街的第210A组屋一座单位发生火患,造成两男一女被困,其中,73岁妇女在被救出时严重烧伤,经过一个多月的治疗后,最终仍不幸离世。 火灾当天,民防部队欲使用水管(hose reels)扑灭火势,但却发现消防栓遭锁上;打开后发现水管竟不出水! 事后,民防部队与裕廊-金文泰市镇会代表一同检查消防栓,而该市镇会也被指不遵守消防安全规定而被警告,要求市镇会纠正违规问题,如若民防部队再次检查发现违规,将可能被罚款高达5000元,或是被起诉。 对于73岁女灾黎吴女士的离世,裕廊-金文泰是真会也在脸书表达哀悼: 然而,民防部队要救火时,最关键的消防水管却无法出水,严重拖延民防人员争分夺秒的救援工作,这件事不容就此带过。 上周一(12月2日),裕廊-金文泰市镇会在脸书发表长文,指他们已经完成调查,指负责维护保养消防栓的承包商 J. Keart Alliances Pte Ltd (简称JKeart),在事故两周前进行维护检查时,未能确保组屋顶楼水泵室的开关,有调整为正确的“自动”模式,导致事故时未能自动供水作救灾用。…

尚穆根“以香港为例” 合理化对新加坡集会活动管制

内政部长兼律政部长尚穆根在国会拨款委员会辩论内政部开支预算时,以香港为例,解释为何新加坡对于示威活动要有严格要求。他认为如今传媒在谈论示威活动时,往往只会关注警方的过度暴力,尤其是国际媒体。 针对包括香港在内的世界多地过去一年都暴发示威,政府国会内政及律政委员会主席荷兰—武吉知马集选区迪舒沙,以及宏茂桥集选区颜添宝等议员提问,我国内政团队从中吸取哪些经验,是否有能力避免类似骚乱? 尚穆根回应说,维护治安不只是执法人员的责任,社会若是没治理好,内政团队也不能发挥作用。“你可以拥有世界上最好的警队,但除非你把其他方面也顾好,否则你仍然无法应对骚乱”,他表示。 “全世界都会发生骚乱,如智力、欧洲、香港等地方,街头抗议已然升级为暴力,扰乱了普通公民的生活,并破坏公共与私人设施。黎巴嫩也曾因数个月的骚乱而造成严重的损失。正如我提到的圣地亚哥,示威者因公共交通票价上涨被激怒,因而开始抢劫商店、放火烧车和物业。” 随后,他以香港日前示威为例表示,示威者当中他们犯下极端暴力与破坏性的行为,其目的就是为了使政府瘫痪,严重损害经济与城市的声誉。同时,也挑衅了警方。 对此,尚穆根也给予香港警方称赞,能够与新加坡并列优秀警察部队。 尚穆根:香港暴力示威因媒体的报道出现偏颇 针对香港的暴力示威,尚穆根称,“我想说,这已然严重损害警方与公众的关系。” 然而,尚穆根批评,其缘由均因媒体的报道出现偏颇,才会让人误以为警方是暴力一方,而忽略整个暴力行为的过程。他更指向当时颇受关注的示威者被真枪击倒一案,媒体忽略整件事的脉络,从而引领观众对警方出现偏见。 “媒体,尤其是国际媒体对局势的片面之词,并无助于平息示威。示威者总被冠以守护民主的称号,而警方却成为他们的对立面,同时反复提及警方过度暴力与残暴的行为。当警方那个第一次向示威者开枪时,媒体却将警方刻画称“暴力”的印象,并在世界各地大肆报道。” “然而,这件事本身的缘由却被忽略了,正如我所说,示威者经常被描绘成为正义的一方,而警方则却在暗地里被攻击,从而使警方的生命与家人处于危险和被曝光当中,但显然,这些事情却被掩盖了。” 对于香港警方,他们为了能够更好保护自己的家人与亲人,不得已而抵抗示威者。…