Ministry of Manpower (MOM) and Land Transport Authority (LTA) on Thursday (14 May) said that the viral video of partitioning the workers on a lorry was a part of “demonstration video” and “proposal” that sent by a construction firm to MOM for consultation.
In a joint statement, the authorities said that they are aware of a video circulating online showing a company demonstrating their installation of partitions in the rear carriage of a lorry.
“We understand that the video was taken at the company’s workshop and the vehicle with the proposed partitions set-up has not been put into use yet,” the statement read.
However, it was noted that the authorities rejected the company’s proposal of setting up the partitions on the lorry while asking them to review their plan.
On Wednesday’s (13 May) afternoon, MOM contacted the company and clarified with them that it “was not secure” for the proposed set-up of the partitions in the rear of the lorry.
The authorities noted, “MOM and LTA have collectively assessed that any sudden movement while travelling on the roads might dislodge the partitions and endanger occupants as well as other road users.”
“We have informed the company of our assessment and advised them to review its plan,” it added.
At the same time, a specific guidance regarding the safe distancing measures for workers transported by lorries has been issued by MOM on its website for company to comply with.
With the new measures in place, each lorry is being permitted to carry fewer workers than before.
“We urge companies to reach out to the authorities to seek necessary clarification on safe distancing measures for lorries. Those who wish to report on workplace safety issues may submit their feedback through [email protected] or SnapSAFE mobile application,” the authorities said.

Company behind the video apologised, saying partitioned lorry arrangement in the “demo video” was one of the solutions in the midst of crisis

Separately, Shin Khai Construction Pte Ltd, who said to be the responsible company of this viral video, took to its Facebook on Thursday, acknowledging that the video of partitioned lorry arrangement circulating in social media was an “internal demo video”.
The company said that they were “surprised” of the “received interest in the video and comments from online netizens.”
“While some comments are encouraging, we regret to hear that the video might have portrayed the way we treated our workers as inhumane and without care. We wished to issue an apology on this,” it wrote on it post.
As a result of possible labour crunch and contactless work method due to COVID-19 pandemic, the company said that construction industry was “under immense challenge”.
Hence the company was trying to find solutions in the midst of this crisis and the partitioned lorry arrangement in the demo video was one of them, it added.
Shin Kai Construction then said, “As we need to conform to the safe distancing rules, our lorry capacity was greatly reduced from 23 pax to 6 pax, which will be of a great concern for our built environment. We were also advised to do more trips to ferry our workers if need to.”
As such, the company hoped to propose a design to the authority which can allow them to increase the capacity to 12 pax.
“This will help in reducing workers waiting time, delay in these event and other traffic issues,” they explained.
Shin Kai Construction said that they are currently appealing to the authority in hope to consider their proposal.
“We are also open to discussion with the authority on this,” it added.

The act of partitioning workers on a lorry drew flak and questions from netizens

The video and photo showing the workers sitting on a partitioned lorry was shared by Raj Singh on his Facebook page. His caption noting that this practice is stupid even though social distance is important.
He wrote, “In fact it’s showing people exactly what they think of foreign workers- animals.” and added that lorries should be stopped from transporting people
Netizens also questioned the act of partitioning the workers on a lorry, whether it is safe for the workers to be seated in this manner and could limit the virus transmission since COVID-19 could be spread through the air.

Subscribe
Notify of
3 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

NUS former educator Tan Ee Lyn shared students’ sexual harassment study on Straits Times

Straits Times (ST) senior correspondent Tan Ee Lyn left National University of…

MOE replies to questions about AWARE’s CSE programme

Schools must ensure programmes run by external agencies are secular and sensitive to the multi-religious make-up of our society, says MOE.

内政部驳斥针对马国囚犯批评 指我国法律前人人平等

内政部否认针对马来西亚囚犯执行死刑的指控,并强调我国法律是同等对待所有人,无论罪犯是本地人或外国人。 当局是针对马国媒体报导指,我国数次拒绝了对被判处死刑的马国毒犯给予宽大请愿一事,做出回应。 内政部发言人于周末(7月13日)回复媒体询问时指出,“所有到访或居住在新加坡的外国人都必须遵守我们的法律,如果他们选择违反我国法律,就必须准备接受法律对付”。 “我国拥有强大的法治力量和独立的司法制度。无论是什么国籍,只要是违法者,包括被判处死刑的罪犯,均依据法律进行正当程序。” 内政部指出,当一名罪犯被判处死刑时,他可以向我国总统提交请愿书,而这将根据其特殊情况或优势进行仔细考量。 至于已经提交的请愿书,总统会在《宪法》第22条文下,根据内阁的建议,决定是否给予刑事宽恕权。《宪法》第22条例规定了给予赦免的规章。 内政部指出,每个国家都有决定,根据各别情况行驶死刑的主权。当然,我国继续使用死刑的决定,也受到国内外维护人权团体的批评。 “根据正当的法律程序强制执行死刑,并没有达到国际共识……我国尊重其他国家决定自家法律制度的主权行使,也期望获得同样的回报。” 马国媒体于上周五(7月12日)报导,指该国四名毒犯的请愿书被拒绝,目前在樟宜监狱面临死刑。 据马来西亚捍卫自由律师团(Lawyers for Liberty)发文告指出,该四名囚犯,也在10名向总统申请特赦的囚犯行列。…

许渊臣针对《防假消息法》表达看法 通讯新闻部发文澄清

上周五,《网络公民》总编许渊臣在个人脸书,针对《防止网络假信息和防止网络操纵法案》(POFMA)发表个人观点,提出该法上诉时间程序,在选举期间可能被滥用,限制公民发表言论的忧虑。 《防假消息法》刚在本月2日起生效。自提呈国会以来,就已饱受争议,不仅政界人士,包括国内外学术界、媒体、公民组织等都已对该法提出质疑,例如担忧法案“定义笼统”、部长/执法机关权力过于广泛、以及可能产生寒蝉效应等,反而不利于公民间对公共政策的良性讨论。 依据该法,如部长/指定人士发出更正/撤除内容/文章的指示,如当事者不满可提出上诉,对上诉的审核期限为两日。 不过,如果上诉也被部长驳回怎么办?可以上诉到高等法院。根据《防假消息法》的附属条例,法庭常务官(Duty Registrar)安排审理当事者上诉个案的聆讯日,通常会是第六个工作日后。 对此,许渊臣认为,仅仅是对部长提出上诉、被驳回再申请法庭聆讯,整个申诉过程就至少要耗掉八天(工作日)的时间,而且还未算上当事人收到指示、以及寻求法律咨询、准备申诉辩词所需的时间。 再者,也没有任何指南显示在聆讯后何时必须作出判决。 反观,新加坡选举从提名日到投票,通常仅需时九日。故此许渊臣打个比方,假设有者要在2015年大选前,想针对集体感染C型肝炎事故进行爆料,执政政府会否发出撤文/跟更正指示,要求证实有关消息是确凿的?那么一般选民就没有机会去听一听,到底爆料消息想表达什么。 而且爆料当事人恐怕要走繁冗的上诉程序,要在工作日抽空提交法律文件到法庭。尽管针对部长撤文指示的上诉聆讯首三日免费,但是第四个聆讯日起,就要6000新元的收费。 有鉴于鲜有政府败诉的先例,这些不利因素,可能让一般民众望而却步,似乎足以堵住悠悠众口。 许渊臣对此讽喻,可能将来新加坡的牛津词典会出现一个新词,形同行动党政府“泼马”(pofma’d)了前方障碍,透过限制公民揭发有关部长和政策的负面消息,在选举中取得空前胜利。 《网络公民》英语站也分享了总编的贴文。…