Photo: straitstimes.com

Due to the worsening COVID-19 situation, 660 private homes were sold last month by developers in Singapore. This is a 32.4 per cent decline from 976 units in February.
From a year-on-year comparison, the figure last month was 37.4 per cent lower than March 2019 at 1,054 units.
Sales in the core central region (CCR) declined, which then led to the decline this month’s decline. Compared to February at 412 units, 45 units were sold in March, which is 89.1 per cent lower. Wing Tai’s The M condo units fuelled the sales in February, with 380 units.
In February, the top seller was the 522-unit The M in Middle Road. During the launch month, 73 per cent of its units were sold at a median price of S$2,439 per square per foot despite the COVID-19 outbreak.
Sales in the outside central region (OCR) and the rest of central region (RCR) both increased 10.6 per cent to 333 units and 7.2 per cent to 282 units in March each respectively.
Last month, 578 units were launched in total, with 314 in the OCR, 163 in the RCR and 101 in the CCR. On the other hand, 933 units were launched in February, with 217 in the OCR, 115 in the RCR and 601 in the CCR.
According to Christine Sun, the Head of Research & Consultancy at Orange & Tie, no mega projects were launched in the CCR in March.
She explained that “New home sales in RCR and OCR remained resilient last month as many deals were probably near completion prior to the worsening of the Covid-19 outbreak and before stricter safe-distancing measures kicked in at the end of March.”
“Some investors may have also bought properties to diversify their investment portfolios after the stock market rout in March,” Ms Sun noted.
On Wednesday (15 April), the figures were released by the Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA) which is based on its survey of licensed housing developers. Executive condominium (EC) units, which are a hybrid of public-private housing, are not included in the figures. If ECs are included, developers’ sales declined 31.3 per cent to 904 units last month, compared to 1,315 units in February.
Sales in Q1 of this year were fairly decent although they fell sharply in March.
In addition, sales in March were the sixth consecutive month that monthly sales volume was higher than the launch volume, as stated by Lee Sze Teck, Huttons Asia’s Director (research).
Mr Lee added that “If we compare 1Q 2019 to 1Q 2020, 2020 is a very good year for the market, with sales estimated to be 16 per cent higher than the same period in 2019. Property is proving to be an enduring asset class for many in times of uncertainty and the desire for wealth preservation amid the stock market rout.”
The sales in April are suffering due to the “circuit breaker”, he pointed out. People are allowed to go out only for essential errands during the “circuit breaker” period from 7 April to 4 May.
Mr Lee concluded: “However, if initial first-week sales are any indication of demand for property, there is cause for optimism. An estimated 150 caveats for new private residential properties were lodged in the first five days of April.”

Subscribe
Notify of
2 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Focus on Healthcare – England’s National Health Service

In this article, our foreign correspondent checks in on the UK’s national healthcare system, specifically the NHS in England. Described as “the largest and the oldest single-payer healthcare system in the world”, it strained under recent economic uncertainty, but have by and large retained its core principle. It also managed to retain citizen support, who are oddly no less critical of its financial viability.

律政部《防假消息法》指南范例:历史学者“J”推论冷藏行动未涉国安问题

《防止网络假信息和防止网络操纵法案》在今年5月正式在国会通过,并已在六月25日发布于宪报,正式生效。该法自提呈国会以来即备受争议,不仅在国会引起激辩,包括国内外学术界、媒体、公民组织等都已对该法提出质疑。 其中,本地历史学者覃炳鑫博士发现,律政部也有发布一份指南,以不同范例解释哪些情况下可援引《防假消息法》,例如哪些陈述属于意见,哪些是造假事实。 这份指南指出,可援引该法的条件包括出现虚假事实,以及涉及公众利益。其中一个栏目特别提出学术界研究例子,阐述什么情况下可能出现学者发表虚假陈述。 覃炳鑫博士曾受邀出席去年的国会特选委员会听证会,为如何应对网络假消息提供意见。期间,他因为提及1963年冷藏行动和1987年光谱逮捕行动,目的在于政治利益,而非国家安全问题,批评人民行动党和前总理李光耀,才是假新闻的散播者,引起律政部长尚穆根等人围剿。 覃炳鑫发现,上述指南陈列的其中一个学术界例子,是这样的: J,一名历史研究者,依据各种历史文件推论,指冷藏行动未涉及国家安全问题。 而后指南继续阐释: 针对(ix)的个案,假设J诠释历史文件,尔后又承认他的诠释是不准确的,然后又重复之前的误导性诠释,那么J就是做出了虚假事实陈述。 难道是如有雷同,纯属巧合?虽然上述案例没有指名道姓,但似乎在影射覃炳鑫博士的经历。对此覃博士只得在脸书自嘲:“如果你的政府拿专制立法特别针对你,那也算一种荣幸。” 不过,他也补充,事实是没有任何证据能表明,在冷藏行动下的拘留者涉及参与颠覆国家的共产党阴谋。 针对上世纪50、60年代期间,新加坡是否有共产主义阴谋散布?左翼份子是否受马共唆使企图进行不利新加坡的政治活动,才有必要进行逮捕行动,覃炳鑫在去年的听证会,和尚穆根等人展开六小时的审问拉锯战。 在过程中,尚穆根以“是或不是”、“同不同意”、“你有读过这些资料吗?”“对与否”等威权式的提问,无意与覃炳鑫对话,过度简化复杂的历史争议,其背后意图却是要质疑覃炳鑫历史研究的正当性和理据。…

PAP’s Janil Puthucheary: “I did not do NS… those are the facts”

New People’s Action Party (PAP) candidate, Dr Janil Puthucheary, says that he…

郑国明:探访亨德申路租赁组屋有感 让所有梦想幻灭地方…

撰文:人民之声党成员郑国明   林殊译 在飞往伦敦的班机上,我观看了香港电影《沦落人》(Still human),这是一个非常触动人心的故事,讲述一个半身不遂的老人梁先生(黄秋生饰演)与菲律宾女佣Evelyn Santo(Crisel Consunji饰演)居住在狭窄的公屋的故事。 狭窄昏暗的居住环境,让梁先生和菲佣日常生活显得非常心酸,菲佣的收入非常少,所以急于赚钱将家用寄回家中喂养孩子。然而,两人之间有相当大的差异:梁先生放弃所有获得好生活的希望与梦想;反观菲佣则是持续拥抱她自己无法完成的梦想-成为专业摄影师。 梁先生在意识到菲佣的梦想对他而言非常重要后,两人的生活产生了戏剧性的改变。梁先生为菲佣购买新的相机并帮助他完成摄影作品,好让她能够参加国际比赛,而最终她也胜出,故事的终结在菲佣结束合约持续追逐梦想,而善良的梁先生则继续不怀梦想地生活在公屋中,对生活并无任何期待。 那么,这个电影与我去探访探访亨德森路租赁组屋所见所闻,又有什么关联? 我与我的志工团队前往探访发现,许多住户的生活日复一日,过着捉襟见肘的生活。简言之,他们并没有足够的收入,或者无法从政府机构取得任何有意义的财务援助。有些住户则因健康问题无法工作,要么只能靠收入微薄的儿女,或者和行动不便的另一半共同生活。 其中一名女住戶回想起过往的经验,他向他的议员求助,却被转介到一个又一个的单位,最终不了了之。她说,“真是浪费时间”。另外几名住户则表示他们曾因为无法去邮局充值,结果房子电源被切断。试想,全家包括小朋友需要呆在黑暗之中整晚,直到父母去充值恢复屋内电源。 这到底是什么样的现代租赁组屋生活?…