World Health Organization (WHO) in an emergency press briefing on Thursday (30 Jan), has declared the deadly Wuhan coronavirus as a public health emergency of international concern.

“Our greatest concern is the potential for the virus to spread to countries with weaker health systems…. This is not a vote of no confidence in China,” World Health Organization (WHO) Director General, Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus told a briefing in Geneva.

The UN health agency, however, does not recommend and opposes travel or trade restrictions with China.

When asked by journalists about its recommendation of not restricting travel, Dr Didier Houssin, advisor to the International Health Regulations (IHR) Emergency Committee for Pneumonia due to the Novel Coronavirus 2019-nCoV, said that countries should act based on science.

Dr Dider explains, “What do you mean by travel restriction. They are, for example, visa refusal, border closure, quartine of travellers who are in good condition. These travel restrictions under public health emergency of international concern… will provide WHO the possibility to question such measures, which already have been taken by some countries. Why did you take this decision? What is the science behind this decision? Could you reconsider this decision? And we suggested to WHO that WHO should inform the world about transparency concerning these measures which should not constitute an example to follow but a decision to reconsider.”

WHO earlier admitted in the footnote of its situational report on Sunday (26 January) that it had “incorrectly summarised the risk for the global level to be moderate” in previous reports on 23, 24 and 25 January. It corrected itself to state that the risk is “very high in China, high at the regional level and high at the global level.”

Reports quoted WHO spokeswoman Fadela Chaib on Monday (27 January) as saying that it was “an error in the wording.”

When asked about the correction, co-director of the Swiss School of Public Health, Antoine Flahault told APF that it was a “sizeable” mistake. He said, “It’s a mistake. It’s definitely a sizeable one… but I really think it’s a mistake that has now been corrected”.

The Wuhan coronavirus has so far infected over 8100 individuals in China and resulted in at least 170 deaths. Over 100 cases have been reported outside of China.

In Singapore, 13 confirmed cases have been announced by the Ministry of Health or 17 cases if we consider the four cases in Malaysia who crossed over via Singapore customs.

The Singapore government had earlier imposed a travel restriction for people who have been in Hubei over the last 14 days or have passports issued in Hubei from entering or transiting Singapore. This took effect on Wed noon (29 Jan).

Students and teachers returning from China to Singapore will also have to take a compulsory 14-day leave of absence.

 

[Update]: Statement on the second meeting of the International Health Regulations (2005) Emergency Committee regarding the outbreak of novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV)

A second meeting of the Emergency Committee was convened by the WHO Director-General under the International Health Regulations (IHR) (2005) regarding the outbreak of novel coronavirus 2019 yesterday (30 Jan) from 1:30pm to 6:35pm Geneva time (CEST).

This second meeting took place in view of significant increases in numbers of cases and additional countries reporting confirmed cases of the virus.

In a statement by the WHO following the meeting, the Committee “acknowledged that there are still many unknowns” with multiple cases being reported in five WHO regions in one month, as well as human-to-human transmission occurring outside of Wuhan and China in general.

However, the Committee “believes that it is still possible to interrupt virus spread, provided that countries put in place strong measures to detect disease early, isolate and treat cases, trace contacts, and promote social distancing measures commensurate with the risk”.

“As the situation continues to evolve, so will the strategic goals and measures to prevent and reduce spread of the infection,” the Committee reassured.

“The Committee agreed that the outbreak now meets the criteria for a Public Health Emergency of International Concern and proposed the following advice to be issued as Temporary Recommendations.”

To read more on the proposed advice issued, click here.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Police calls for next-of-kin for 57 yr-old deceased to come forth

The Singapore Police Force has announced that it is appealing for the…

三官委议员坚持立场力争修《防假消息法》遭否决

5月8日,《防止网络假信息和网络操纵法案》在国会经过两天、超过13小时的马拉松辩论,最终以72赞成票、九张反对票、三张弃权票,三读通过。共有七名部长和次长、31名议员参与相关辩论,其中三名官委议员:王丽婷、特斯拉和郭秀钦,争取通过他们的修法建议但遭否决,在三读时投弃权票。 在辩论进行时,王丽婷数度提出《防假信息法》的修改建议,包括了要求部长们保证能够更加严格看待修正建议、将部长和政府的权限写入法案主体中、要求设立独立的理事会监督执法、还有上诉程序中的缺陷等等。 他们也呼吁政府修改法案中,对“事实”和“不真实信息”的定义,因为目前的定义仍然太过宽泛和主观。 在针对上诉程序中,三人建议在法案中加入一个阐明更多立法原则的条文,并且建议上诉程序必须迅速且成本低。惟,但是尚穆根对此建议表示不认同,他认为三人提出的原则过于宽泛,与之相比,政府反而给出了更具体的时间表。 三人多数建议中,有些在第二次辩论中就已经不被采纳,因此他们决定弃权。 特斯拉更是数度要求国会秘书将有关的弃权票数记录在案。 间中,工人党党魁毕丹星也曾经一度站起来发言,表示对于他们之前不被采纳的建议,每一条都投弃权票。(工人党立场是反对《防假消息法》) 工人党议员之前曾表示,法案将导致寒蝉效应,严重影响人们言论自由。 网民评论有褒有贬 三名官委议员的表现,在《网络公民》脸书专页上载后,网民反应有褒有贬。有人按赞,为三人的表现鼓掌,有人感到无奈,也有人觉得力量不足。 有网民对他们的表现感到敬佩,甚至称赞他们为勇敢的火枪手(brave musketeers)。…

Worms founds in water supply at Ang Mo Kio

A worm was found in water at Block 472, Ang Mo Kio…