The Singapore Civil Defence Force (SCDF) took to its Facebook page today (6 December) to edit its earlier post where it stated that a personal mobility device (PMD) that was left charging caused a fire at Clementi HDB flat.
SCDF made the correction after netizens spotted the error and highlighted it in the comment section of the post.
It all started when SCDF published a post on Thursday (5 December) saying that they responded to a fire outside of a 14th floor unit at Block 715 Clementi West Street 2 around 12.45pm.
They revealed that the fire involved a PMD that was placed along the common corridor at the flat and it was put out by SCDF’s team using one water jet.
Thankfully, no one was reported injured and the three occupants from the affected unit were safely evacuated.
“Preliminary investigation indicates that the fire was of electrical origin from the PMD which was charging along the common corridor at the time of the fire. SCDF would like to remind the public on the prevention of PMD/PAB fires with the fire safety tips included in the inforgraphic,” SCDF said.
It continued, “LTA encourages all PMD owners to use UL2272 certified devices. When purchasing a PMD, look out for UL2272 Certification Marks. All owners of non-UL2272 certified PMDs are strongly encouraged to dispose of their device at designated disposal points as soon as possible.”
Along with the post, SCDF also attached images of the fire scene, including a picture of the burnt mobility device.

Online users spotted the error

Upon reading the post, many netizens pointed out that the device involved in the fire is in fact a Power-Assisted Bicycle (PAB), and not a PMD.
They slammed SCDF for not knowing the difference between an e-bike and a PMD.

A PAB, also known as an e-bike, looks very much like a conventional bicycle, except that it is equipped with an electric motor to assist in pedalling.
This means that PABs can be used on public roads or cycling/shared paths, but it must be type-approved, sealed and registered. The registration of PABs help to improve Land Transport Authority’s enforcement against the use of non-compliant PABs.
According to the law, an e-bike does not need to be UL2272 certified. However, it needs to fulfill other technical specifications like not exceeding 20kg in weight, comply with the EN15194 European Standard and more.
After reading netizens’ comment, SCDF promptly edited the error that it made in its earlier post.
It stated that the device that was involved in the fire was indeed an e-bike that was left charging in the common corridor of the HDB flat.
“This post has been edited based on feedback received from netizens. We thank you for the feedback/comments,” SCDF said.
“REMEMBER: For those who own mobility devices, please refrain from any unauthorised/illegal modifications and over-charging of the batteries,” it added.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

无准证办集会、拒签口供被罚款 范国瀚要求监禁16日代替

社运份子范国瀚因无准证举办集会、拒签署口供,被罚款3200元。后者选择以监禁16天代替。 在上月三日,新加坡法院今日裁定范国瀚有罪,被控违反《公共秩序法》,该法要求有外国演讲者的活动,必须事先申请和得到警方许可。 范国瀚于今日出庭,法官针对范国瀚无准证举行公众集会,判处罚款2000元或监禁10日;而拒绝签署口供罪名则面对1200罚款或监禁六日。 范国瀚选择接受监禁16日刑罚,但他有意提出上诉,以8000元保外。 范国瀚的辩护律师尤金在庭上指出,若依据《公共秩序法》,范所举办的集会并没有导致公共秩序混乱,判决应该考量这一事实。再者,范国瀚并没有作出假证供,只不过是拒绝签署口供。 不过法官在阐述判决时表示,范国瀚已被警方告知必须申请准证,但后者却没有照做。 范国瀚在2016年11月26日,在新民巷主办“公民抗命即社会运动”论坛,邀请香港“黄雨伞运动”中的学运领袖黄之锋,透过Skype与现场观众连线对谈交流。 当时,他和主办人之一的Rachel Zeng认为对社会运动的健康讨论,并不会构成威胁,活动最后也平和地结束。 警方告知范国瀚,即便是视讯集会也必须先申请准证。 在接受警方调查时,查案人员传召范国瀚问话,并在录完口供后,要求范国瀚确认签字。 范国瀚要求索取口供书的备份后,才肯签名。警方以口供书属于机密文件为由,拒绝他的要求,并表示,如果范国瀚不签名,可能会触犯法律。…

SPP Career Fair for Singaporeans 16th June 2012

PRESS RELEASE The Singapore People’s Party (SPP) will be organizing a Career…

WP’s Pritam Singh joins colleague Nicole Seah for insightful meeting with Care Corner Youth GO!

Singapore’s Workers’ Party (WP) chief Pritam Singh took to Facebook on Wednesday…