Earlier this month (9 Nov), Trade and Industry Minister Chan Chun Sing warned people not to “stoke fears” online with regard to the Singapore-India Comprehensive Economic Cooperation Agreement (CECA) which was signed between both countries in 2005.
He said claims that CECA has cost job opportunities for Singaporeans are aimed to “stoke fears” in times of economic uncertainties. CECA does not grant Indian nationals unconditional access into Singapore or immigration privileges, he added.
“Indian professionals, like any other professionals from other countries, have to meet MOM’s (Ministry of Manpower’s) existing qualifying criteria to work in Singapore. This applies to Employment Pass, S Pass, and work permit,” he said.
Contrary to claims that Singaporeans have lost out on PMET jobs, Chan pointed out that Singapore’s network of FTAs has in fact increased these jobs by 400,000 to 1.25 million since 2005, although he didn’t specifically reveal the number of jobs created due to CECA.
While Chan warned people not to “stoke fears”, he however, acknowledged that economic uncertainties have created anxieties over job security. He asserted that perpetuating fear, is not the right response.
“We understand, and we share Singaporeans’ concerns with competition and job prospects in the current uncertain economic environment. But the way to help Singaporeans is not to mislead them and create fear and anger,” said Chan.
“The way to help Singaporeans is to make sure that first, we expand our markets for our enterprises. Train our workers constantly to stay ahead of competition. Never allow others to stoke the fears and racial biases of our people. Never do this for selfish personal or political reasons.”
Number of foreign PMETs continues to increase in Singapore
Meanwhile, the Singapore government continues to allow more foreign PMETs to enter into Singapore to work, according to data on MOM website:

The total number of foreign EP and S-Pass holders was 381,300 by end of 2018. In fact, 6 months later by end June 2019, that number had increased to 386,800.
This is in line with its Population White Paper (PWP) policy which was passed in Feb 2013 where the government set a target of introducing 30,000 new permanent residents and 25,000 naturalized citizens each year to sustain Singapore’s population due to the falling birth rates in Singapore.
While the target set in the PWP was 6.9 million, DPM Heng, the designated new 4G leader who would take over from PM Lee, favours a 10 million population for Singapore.
In March this year at a ministerial dialogue at Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Heng told the students that Singaporeans need to be open to foreigners. He said, “We ought to deepen our understanding of other people… whether they are new immigrants, our immediate neighbors, students from NTU, National University of Singapore or other universities.”
Heng then told the audience that Singapore’s population density is not excessive, noting that other cities are even more crowded and dense. He went on to cite former chief planner Liu Thai Ker, who said in 2014 that Singapore should plan for 10 million people for it to remain sustainable in the long term.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

New textbook tells of earlier history of Singapore

Singapore has rewritten the history taught in secondary school to expand the…

Foreign scholars: Missing statistics?

~by: Leong Sze Hian~ I refer to the article “Foreign scholars closely…

我国列全球第四进口鱼翅数量国

鱼翅在华人传统菜肴中一直被视为是名贵食材之一,尽管近年来国际环保组织一直在呼吁禁止食用鱼翅,但仍不阻止人们持续猎杀鲨鱼。据国际野生物贸易研究组织(TRAFFIC)近日公布的调查结果指出,我国在以每年1500多公吨的鱼翅进口量,名列全球第四。 报告指出,香港每年平均进口9000多公吨的鱼翅,居全球之冠,而接着以邻国马来西亚(每年2500多公吨)与中国(每年1800多公吨)排名第二与第三。 鱼翅一直在东亚国家很是受欢迎,亦持续推动鱼翅交易的主要原因。报告指出,2000至2016年间,全球各国和地区间每年平均以1万6000多公吨进行交易,而全球四大鱼翅进口国的进口量竟占鱼翅总交易的九成。 因鲨鱼需求量大,导致鲨鱼面临“濒临绝种”的危机。报告指出,全球17巴仙的鲨鱼已被列为“极度濒危动物”,另外13%的鲨鱼则近乎绝种。 研究者表示,种种迹象亦表明过度猎杀和无止尽交易导致鲨鱼数量急速下降。他也呼吁,鲨鱼在海洋中一直扮演重要角色,一旦数量下降,可能对海洋生态有所影响,因此促请对猎捕手实行监管,减少猎杀鲨鱼行动。  

口罩沾满呕吐物仍不更换 儿控诉乐龄关怀中心恶行

患有轻微老年痴呆症的老妇。疑在乐龄关怀中心遭遇不良对待,该名老妇之子控诉中心看护,母亲不适呕吐后未更换口罩,还将有呕吐物的口罩让她戴上,气得儿子在社交媒体上申诉! 41岁的陈伟平,日前在脸书上指责圣路加乐龄关怀(St Luke’s Eldercare)不人道对待母亲。 据他所述,母亲在午餐后,稍感不适而呕吐。然而,看护清理掉呕吐物,却让母亲将原本已沾满呕吐物的口罩戴回。母亲也曾提醒他们口罩已经肮脏,但看护却仍不愿意将口罩换掉。 “难道你就不能帮可怜的老人换个干净的口罩吗?换个口罩能花多少钱?” 陈伟平续指,尤其在这疫情爆发期间,老人的卫生攸关性命,因此斥责看护的行为相当不负责任。 陈伟平还表示,如果中心真的担心口罩价太高,大可向家属开价,由家属承担口罩费用。 除了口罩的问题,他还控诉中心并没有即时更换成人纸尿片,让母亲包着脏的纸尿片好几个小时,导致皮疹,而且不负责任的行为不仅出现一次。 陈伟平表示每天早上9点左右送母亲至中心,于下午3点接她回家。而当天(9月14日)母亲因前天肚子不舒服,曾去看医生开药,回家后也曾发生呕吐。到了中心后,不料在享用午餐后再次呕吐,看护也马上通知家人。 他表示,自己在接母亲后,确实发现她鼻子上方、衣物和外套残留呕吐物,当下以为只是清理不干净,想先带母亲回家换洗。 然而,在回家后将口罩摘下,却发现里面全是呕吐物残渣。据母亲表示,看护替她清理后,替她戴回旧的口罩,母亲告诉看护口罩肮脏,但对方说没关系。…