Young man riding an electric scooter in Singapore with an amazing view on the city (Photo by Ingus Kruklitis from Shutterstock.com).

The Land Transport Authority (LTA) has once again put on hold its decision on whether to award licences to companies seeking to operate sharing services for personal mobility devices (PMDs). This is the second time in four months the agency has done so.
In the beginning of the year, 14 companies had submitted applications to operate PMD-sharing services in Singapore.
The application results were initially expected to be out in the second quarter of this year, but it had been postponed to the third quarter. That time, LTA explained that it decided to push back the announcement as it needed more time to review “imposing additional requirements on licensees to ensure the safety of users and the general public”.
However, on Monday (30 September), a spokesperson from LTA said that it will announce the results of the “PMD and bicycle-sharing operator licences at a later date”.
It added that it will consult device-sharing and rental companies on more regulations to improve public safety.
“This is part of a review to extend safety measures to all electric-scooter sharing and rental companies, as they provide devices that are more easily accessible to the public, including less experienced riders,” the spokesperson said while responding to media queries.
Additionally, LTA also revealed that it needs to look further into suggestion made by others, like to incorporate “locally developed tracker” in order to monitor the speed and location of the devices.
“While such technology exists, there are implementation difficulties that have to be studied further. These implementation difficulties include ensuring that the speed tracking device is tamper proof, and the accuracy of location data,” the Agency explained.
According to the law, PMDs which include electric scooters, hoverboards and unicycles cannot be used on roads. They are only permitted on footpaths and shared pathways, like cycling paths and park-connector networks.
Out of the 14 companies that applied for the licence to run PMD-sharing services, at least two – Chinese firm Mobike and United States-based Lime – have pull out their applications.
An applicant, Singapore-based Beam – which is currently operating in countries like Malaysia and Australia – said that it was disappointed that there’s another delay in issuing the licences.
“We are hopeful that the delay will be short and that LTA will conduct meaningful consultations with operators to address any concerns that have not been raised during the eight-month evaluation process,” said Beam’s corporate affairs vice-president Christopher Hilton to CNA.
Neuron Mobility, another company that applied for the licence, said that it was committed to work with LTA in order to find out what other regulations can be implemented to improve safety.
A spokesperson from the company said to CNA that she believes that technology would be able to address many safety concerns. For instance, one can use geofencing to detect and manage the speed of PMDs.
LTA’s announcement comes at a time when everyone in the country is worried on the safety of PMDs.
Just last week, an elderly woman succumbed to the injuries she sustained after her bicycle collided with an e-scooter at Bedok North. The 65-year-old woman was in coma after she suffered fractures to her ribs and collarbone and serious brain injuries, before passing away at Changi General Hospital’s Intensive Care Unit on Wednesday (25 September).
On Friday (27 September), the Active Mobility Advisory Panel – which handles the rules governing the use of PMDs, bicycle and other equipment – said that it is pushing the Government to mandate a theory test and ban the use of mobile phones while riding PMDs, unless they are mounted or used in a hands-free manner. The Panel also urged the Government to set a minimum age requirement of 16 for all e-scooter riders on public paths.
For those below the age of 16, they can ride under the supervision of adults.
Other recommendations that it highlighted included making it compulsory for businesses to obtain third-party liability insurance – which allows victims to file claims for damage – in order to cover e-scooter riders who use the vehicles for work.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Mothers question MOE's policy of withholding PSLE results; donors ask why there is an underclass in Singapore

Something is “very seriously wrong” about the Ministry of Education (MOE) policy…

组屋消防栓被锁、不出水 穆仁理发文解释并致歉

组屋消防栓被锁,要救火时水管喷不出水,对此民防部队在本月8日,向裕廊-金文泰市镇理事会,发出“消除火患隐忧通知书”(Fire Hazard Abatement Notice)。 有关市镇会在本月13日回应《亚洲新闻台》,澄清有关消防栓刚在上月中旬被检查,被鉴定操作正常。 事缘本月1日,武吉巴督21街的第210A组屋一单位发生火患,民防部队人员赶赴救火,却发现火患现场附近好几个消防栓都被锁头锁住;即便撬开其中一个消防栓,水管根本喷不出水! 至于武吉巴督单选区议员穆仁理,昨日在脸书发声明,承认上述市镇会接到民防部队的通知书;也指作为民选代议士,“政治上需对居民负责”( politically accountable)。“这些事件不该发生,我必须道歉。我将与我的民选与受委市镇会同仁检讨此事,并保障加强消防安全系统的可靠。” 在帖文中他指出,实际上火灾当天他都有在现场,惟当时自己专注在如何协助火灾灾黎,并感谢协助疏散的居民。 他表示当时民防部队人员就已向他反映组屋第13楼消防栓的问题,本身关注此事也要求民防人员彻查。他解释由于火患烧毁13楼的水管,导致14和15楼居民没水上厕所、抽水等,当时自己也忙于协助其他受影响居民。 穆仁理提到负责维护消防栓的承包商是JKeart公司,后者坚称水管是有水用的,也向市镇会展示,在火灾同一天他们对水管进行测试的视频;不过在会见和咨询民防官员后,市镇会决定接受民防部队发表的声明。 市镇官员锁消防栓防滥用…

刘特佐砸150万新元 请公关公司修复个人形象

根据《纽约时报》报导,受到马来西亚警方通缉的年轻富豪刘特佐,花费超过110万美元(约150万新元),通过两家美国律师楼在全球进行宣传,洗清因一马公司丑闻受损的形象。 负责此行动的两家律师楼分別是Kobre & Kim和Schillings International律师楼,他们在过去7个月中积极展开行动,并通过聘请公关公司等行事。 相关服务包括全天候的危机处理公关回应、塑造网络的搜寻结果、设立网站,专门提供和刊载刘特佐相关新闻、国际报告和法律文件。 《纽约时报》报导指,超过81万8000美元已支付给三家公关公司和一数码搜寻公司,当中有54万4000美元,支付给设立在纽约的公关公司。 报导称,其中一家公关公司是由刘特佐律师之一,詹姆斯哈格迪(James Haggerty)所拥有的PRCG Haggerty。 《纽约时报》是援引美国司法部的法律文件,根据《外国代理人登记法》(Fara)发现,PRCG Haggerty向美国司法部提呈相关委託。…

Chiam See Tong: Statement on Hougang by-election results

The Singapore People's Party congratulates MP-elect Mr Png Eng Huat and the…