On March 22 this year, 72-year-old taxi driver, who didn’t know he had a tumour in his liver, suddenly blacked out while driving along Queensway, causing his vehicle to hit pedestrians at a traffic crossing. He lost his consciousness as the tumour in his liver unexpectedly ruptured.
It is said that How Yuen Fah’s taxi hit at least three pedestrians, including an elderly woman, at a traffic light which was then showing the green man signal.
Due to the impact of the accident, 66-year-old Tng Yew Huay was immediately rushed to the National University Hospital (NUH) where she later succumbed to her head injury at around 9.20pm that day.
The other pedestrians survived the accident.
Following an inquiry on Wednesday (18 September), State Coroner Kamala Ponnanpalam revealed that the accident had been an “unfortunate traffic misadventure”.
The state coroner told The Straits Times (ST) that Mr How was sent to NUH and a scan showed that his tumour ruptured. Besides that, he also underwent a surgery and other medical investigations which pointed out that he had hepatocellular carcinoma, a cancer of the liver.
As such, she said that, “The doctore who treated him clarified that the tumour rupture caused severe bleeding into the involved party’s abdomen and a loss of blood flow to his brain.”
She added, “The doctor also clarified that this caused the transient period of loss of consciousness. Based on the evidence uncovered, there is no basis to suspect foul play.”

How it all started

During the inquiry, it was found that Mr How began driving his taxi at about 6.30pm on 22 March. ST reported that he felt fine at that time and was well rested before he started his shift.
However, he felt a sharp pain in his right abdomen after picking up three passengers at a taxi stand at Bishan Road. The pain eventually went away.
But, the pain came back when he was travelling along Commonwealth Avenue West towards Queensway. This time he also felt pain in his neck, his vision became blurry and he started breaking out in cold sweat.
To feel better, he applied medicated oil on his forehead and nose.
Soon after that, Mr How stopped at the junction of Jalan Bukit Merah as the traffic lights turned red.
According to the state coroner, she said that Mr Ho remembered signalling right before he lost his consciousness.
This was when his car beat the red light and suddenly veered and plowed into pedestrians crossing the road.
“When he regained consciousness, he heard the front seat passenger..shouting at him,” said the state coroner.
After he woke out, Mr How said that he felt pain at the right side of his stomach. He also realised that his vehicle’s windscreen was cracked and he was already at the junction of Alexandra Road.
He also noted that he didn’t know that a collision had happened.
Here’s a video of accident published by ST.

Upon reading this news, many netizens felt sorry for Mr How for this unfortunate incident and hopes he recovers soon. Writing in the Facebook pages of Mothership and ST, they also said that Mr How must have felt horrible to regain his unconsciousness and know that he killed someone.

Besides that, a large number of them also question the need for a 72-year-old man to work at such an old age. They said that he should be retired and rest at home but is forced to work as he might not have enough savings to survive in this country.

Others suggested that elderly workers should go for general health screening so this kind of unfortunate accident can be prevented. Some proposed that “all driving lessons should include a part to teach people what to do if they themselves have a medical emergency”. By doing so, they will know what they should do if they encounter such a situation.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

香港记者协会控警滥权 要求召开独立调查委会彻查

近日全球关注香港历史性的反修订《逃犯条例》集会,许多媒体记者也在前线时刻更新最新动态。然而,恪尽职守的媒体记者报导香港动态的同时,却也申诉遭受香港警察的暴力对待,根据《立场新闻》报道,香港记者协会(HKJA)已向警方提出约27项的申诉。 香港记者协会周一(17日)向监警会申诉,港警在驱散的过程不停向港媒投掷催泪弹、遭受港警的警棍殴打及暴力对待,以及不合理的搜身及阻碍采访。与此同时,香港记者协会也致函香港特首林郑月娥,要求召开独立调查委员会,彻查警方的暴力行为,是否有涉及更高层人士的指示。 记协有分理由认为,有关警员当时清楚知道对方的记者身份,这些警员对于一些显然是记者的人士,使用非必要的武力和威吓,已远超行使维持公共秩序的合法权力。”香港记者协会表示。 记协整合了由6月10日-6月17日,共27宗投诉。其中包括 10 宗近距离向工作中的记者发射催泪物品、三宗以警棍追打记者、三 宗没有合理理由下搜身,阻碍采访、一宗被橡胶子弹所伤。 另一方面,记协也整理出八宗以盾牌及警棍推撞及驱赶记者 ,至其无法有效观察并报导警员清场行动的地方。过程中,有关警员一直拒绝界定封锁范围。最少一名记者受伤因此受伤;两宗用强光电筒照射镜头,令记者难以拍摄。 记协认为,受害记者均符合记协设定之三项条件,包括当事人有清楚展示记者身份,如写有PRESS 大字的反光衣、头盔或记者证;当事人有清楚向警员说明其记者身份;事发时当事人并非处于示威群众之中。 根据《立场新闻》报道,为确保资料之真实性,记协联络了当中每一位当事人,个案的资料全部由当事人具名向记协提供,附以当事人或其他在场记者提供的照片及影像记录。除了极少部份由于受到雇主限制或安全考虑外,大部份当事人均愿意将其资料均呈交监警会。…

Reform Party’s Kenneth Jeyaretnam challenges “fake news”, a COVID-19 election, advantages for PAP

After his pre-Nomination day video on Tuesday morning (30 June), the Reform’s…

Deliveroo Singapore added 1,000 riders to its fleet in April alone following record number of rider applications in Q1 2020

Amid a surge in demand for food delivery services during the COVID-19…