In an interview with Channel News Asia, Law & Home Affairs Minister K Shanmugam said that based on meetings he’s had and various feedback, the people ‘by and large’ understand the proposed anti-fake news legislation and while there are concerns, it is restricted to a smaller group.

For those who have concerns, his message is that “99% of people don’t have to worry about what they do 99% of the time”. The primary approach that the government will take under POFMA is to ask tech platforms to put a notice that a statement is false which will be pushed out to everyone.

“The people who need to be concerned are the people who profit from and peddle in falsehoods. They put out [sic] knowing that it’s false and they know that they are going to profit from it. They are doing it deliberately, they are setting it out, there’s some element of malice, they need to worry,” said Mr Shamugam, adding that most people do not fall into that category.

Under the proposed law, anyone posting from their own account or using a bot will be held liable should they post misleading information or falsehoods. So what about fake accounts? If the government finds that an account is inauthentic, made for the sole purpose of spreading one type of message that may be misleading, will those be shut down?

Specifically, what about fake accounts that support the government?

These pro-PAP Facebook pages and accounts are everywhere including one we found which left a comment on the CNA Facebook post sharing this interview with Mr Shanmugam.

One commenter, Melvin Sim wrote, “Getting own media to interview?! All questions and answers were definitely planned beforehand… To me, its so fake! ???. You should try letting an international media company interview, just like LKY!”

In response, San YC Wang retorted Sim for his comments.

Sim then accused Wang’s account as a fake account and wrote, “San YC Wang lmfao… fake account?!! You lot of people only know how to hide behind a fake account and going around commenting, you fakers… so much like the fake fellow being interviewed by CNA(also another local media acting and spreading fake news for those in power)! Go search how many international media companies was so interested in and has interviewed LKY and was broadcasted through the years!”

And true enough, Wang’s account does not seem to be an authentic social media account of a person – with no personal information, no friends, and only follows a large number of political pages in Singapore.

This ‘person’ also didn’t respond further to replies either to defend themselves or further their argument. This is just one of many pro-government fake accounts we’ve seen on Facebook.

In August last year we highlighted a rise in fake accounts coming out in support of MINDEF in the comments section of mainstream media Facebook pages. The same accounts were seen defending MINDEF and with a little digging, it appears that these were created fairly recently with all the same traits as the account mentioned above – little to no personal postings and follows a handful of socio-political and government pages. While those specific profiles have since been suspended or deactivated, what of the countless others that are still active on social media which are clearly attempting to increase the number of positive comments made about the government?

Will those be shut down as well? Will that be considered an offence under POFMA? Or will they be exempt under Clause 61 of the bill?

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

PM Lee at the SUSS Ministerial Forum: Connections may open doors but substance is what matters

During an hour-long ministerial forum with students of the Singapore University of…

Ho Ching: “Temasek’s own annual reporting will be delayed from Jul till Sep”

Ho Ching announced on her Facebook page today (2 Jul) that Temasek…

比拉哈里暗讽李显扬未能把故居套利 遭李玮玲怒斥毫无根据

我国外交部前常任秘书比拉哈里,在选举冷静日当天(9日),发文质疑建国总理李光耀次子、前进党成员李显扬,攻击“特权”,但自身却从他口中特权受益。 不过比拉哈里的言论,在今日遭到李显扬姐姐李玮玲的驳斥。 比拉哈里的言论,也暗讽李显扬的作为,是否是因为不被允许把欧思礼路38号故居套现。比拉哈里还质问如果李显扬真的感到失望,为何还不负责任地到处找麻烦。 “至于你不参选的借口:新加坡不需要多一位李家人,是空洞的,如果你做的不是政治是什么?懦夫!” 此外,在留言区由网民问,究竟李显扬是被赠予还是买下欧思礼路故居,对此比拉哈里声称,李显龙继承了故居,但是当李显扬到处责难时,前者仅以1美元价格卖给了李显扬。 不过这显然不是事实,因为后来李显扬是以市价从哥哥手中买下38号故居,条件是再拿出屋价市值的50巴仙捐作慈善,李显扬也做到了。 在2017年7月,李玮玲曾提及哥哥曾献议以以1元把欧思礼过名给她,她便要求显扬一起参与这项交易。但显扬老早就计划当姐姐不续住时,就拆毁故居。 相信比拉哈里的说辞令身为姐姐的李玮玲大为光火,也毫不客气在脸书驳斥,比拉哈里的说法是没有根据的,也重申他以市价从李显龙手中买下。 “再者,李显扬买下时,知道爸爸授予我继续住在老家的权利。”李显扬买下故居时,也清楚知道2015年4月,市区重建局和文物局曾作明确声明: “基于该产业的历史意义,如决定要拆除故居,政府不会容许将之作有违其历史意义的重新发展,如商业或密集住宅开发。” “指显扬买下屋子来牟利,根本就是子虚乌有。” 据了解,也有民众针对比拉哈里的言论报警,质疑后者在选举冷静日涉嫌“在政党政治上影响民众”。