Photo of TuasSpring power plant from Hyflux’s website

Hyflux has challenged Salim-Medco’s justification for intending to withdraw from its bailout deal with the debt-ridden homegrown water firm.

The Business Times (BT) reported Hyflux as saying in response to questions from the Securities Investors Association Singapore (SIAS) on Tue (26 Mar) that it “has been advised that Salim-Medco cannot rely on the PUB’s termination of the WPA to lawfully and effectively terminate the restructuring agreement prior to the long-stop date”.

Instead, the company revealed during a bourse meeting on Tue that “certain disagreements have recently emerged” between the company and SM Investments Pte Ltd, the Singapore unit of the Indonesian-based Salim Group, according to BT.

However, despite being “unable to meaningfully engage” with the consortium, Hyflux’s restructuring agreement with Salim-Medco “remains in force and the investor has not stated that it will resile from its proposed investment,” said the firm.

BT also reported Hyflux as saying that before the restructuring plan was published on 16 Feb, it has already reached a mutual agreement with the consortium on the commercial terms regarding the overall allocation of cash and equity.

This, according to the firm, is contrary to Salim-Medco’s claims that the company has not agreed to the commercial terms of their restructuring plan, particularly “the aggregate cash amount of S$272 million for distribution to relevant creditors, with S$271 million to be derived from the intended investment”.

In the event that the consortium “wrongfully terminates” its restructuring agreement with Hyflux, the company said that it it is entitled to claim the S$38.9 million deposit from Salim-Medco’s proposed investment, which, according to BT, “was placed into escrow shortly after the agreement was executed”.

PUB’s statements not a “threat” to Hyflux and Tuaspring, as WPA has yet to be terminated by the Board: Hyflux

Hyflux, in the same bourse filing, also responded to speculation surrounding PUB’s intention to seize its Tuaspring desalination plant, stating that it does not consider itself threatened by any announcements made by the Ministry of Environment and Water Resources (MEWR) statutory board regarding the firm and its plant so far, as PUB has yet to terminate the Water Plant Agreement (WPA) with the firm.

The firm added that PUB will technically be able to terminate the WPA on 6 Apr at its earliest, but should a 30-day notice from PUB be included, the agreement will only be officially terminated on May 6.

The latter date far exceeds the long-stop date fixed by the Salim-Medco consortium on 30 Apr, which means that the Salim-Medco consortium’s termination of the restructuring agreement will only take effect after the completion date of its investments in Hyflux.

While Hyflux has decided to call off its third town hall meeting, it will proceed with the scheme meetings with its creditors as scheduled on the 5th and 8th next month, in addition to an extraordinary general meeting on the 15th the same month.

Salim should not use possible seizure of Tuaspring to justify terminating its deal with Hyflux: PUB

In its press release last Fri (22 Mar), PUB claimed that Hyflux has “noted that PUB’s actions … would be favourable to” Tuaspring.

This is because, according to PUB, Hyflux suggested that the Board’s actions will lift “the pressure on the rest of the Hyflux Group”.

Consequently, the value of Hyflux and its shares will most likely observe a positive change as a result of PUB’s actions, according to the statutory board.

The Board added that its takeover of Tuaspring “will also increase the chances of Hyflux being successfully restructured”.

“PUB’s actions should therefore not be used as the basis for SM Investments’s decision to withdraw from the Restructuring Agreement”, stressed PUB.

PUB also assured in its press release on Fri that it has “the operational capabilities, experience and manpower to run” the Tuaspring desalination plant.

As Singapore’s national water agency, PUB is responsible for managing the Republic’s water supply via the Four National Taps, namely local catchment water, imported water, NEWater, and desalinated water.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Blogger Roy Ngerng dismissed from job at Tan Tock Seng Hospital

Tan Tock Seng Hospital (TTSH) has announced via a press statement that…

砂商家获准证卖鞭炮 仅限十五种

在新加坡,政府自70年代就制定《危险烟火法》,严禁民众使用和拥有烟火,民间团体若要燃放,也许获得政府核实安全标准是否合格才能批准。 不过在马来西亚砂拉越,当地有商家获得准证,在佳节期间公开贩售鞭炮。 根据马国《星洲日报》采访古晋警区主任,证实该警区约发出了十余张售卖鞭炮烟花的执照,不过仅限佳节期间如农历新年、开斋节、达雅节和圣诞节时使用。 这些执照有期限,执照有效期至元宵节,且只限出售十五种鞭炮,包括传统顺利红炮和烟花。商家要向内政部批准的代理公司申请,待对方批准后,商家再向警方申请执照。 不代表民间能公开购买 不过,马国总警长弗兹在受媒体询问时又表示“毫不知情”,又强调不是所有鞭炮都可以合法售卖,即使持有准证也不例外。 不过,也有当地律师认为,即便商家有合法准证卖烟火,不代表民众可以公然购买。许多社团组织举行庆典,其实都是在无准证情况下燃放,实际上警方也是“睁一只眼闭一只眼”。他劝民众还是不买鞭炮为妙,以免惹麻烦。 就在去年,吉隆坡一家得易购(TESCO)商场公开售卖鞭炮,虽然声称获得警方批准许可,不过最后仍受警方取缔。理由是马国可公开贩售的烟花,仅限“POP-POP”和“HAPPY BOOM”两种,但要贩卖仍需向地方警区申请准证。 在马国,1996年就已出台《鞭炮与烟花禁令》,燃放鞭炮罚款100令吉或监禁不超过一个月,生产“爆炸物”就罚款2000令吉,收藏“爆炸物”就罚款700令吉,拥有“爆炸物”罚款300令吉。

A matter of interpretation

The Law Society should use its skills for the public good. By Benjamin Cheah.