An 18-year-old Malaysian boy who reportedly went ‘missing’ in Singapore for 10 days was found on Sunday (6 Jan) by an elderly woman at Haig Road.

The boy told eNanyang on Wednesday (8 Jan) that he was sitting alone in a park, not knowing where he was, when a woman in her seventies approached him and asked him if he was “the missing boy from Malaysia”.

Narrating his experience, the boy recalled the time he walked to a café nearby his friend’s apartment – where he was staying whilst in Singapore looking for work – with S$50 on 26 Dec last year.

However, he said that he could not find his way back to his friend’s apartment.

To make matters worse, he had left his passport, mobile phone, and RM 1,500 in the apartment.

Having walked 12 hours daily, he was still unable to find his way back “at all”, as “every apartment looked the same” to him.

Stressing that he is “a shy person”, he was apprehensive about asking for directions, whether back to his friend’s apartment or the nearest police station, as he did “not really know how Singaporeans are like”.

“I didn’t dare to talk to them or borrow their phones,” he said.

The boy noted that he had also “tried looking for police stations but to no avail”.

Throughout his 10-day ordeal, he said he subsisted on chap fan (mixed rice).

He added that he had to resort to “begging from strangers” on the final couple of days, as he had already spent all of his money “by the eighth day”.

The youth has since returned to Malaysia via bus, and has expressed his reluctance to revisit Singapore as a result of the incident.

Many netizens appear to be baffled by the boy’s explanation as to why he went ‘missing’ for 10 days, given that he was brave enough to travel to the Republic to look for employment on his own, and given his age, which is that of the minimum legal age or a typically “adult” age:

However, many netizens were also sympathetic towards the 18-year-old, pointing out that possible underlying factors such as his tender age, a sheltered upbringing, limited life experience, and even possible mental or neurological issues might have contributed to his predicament:

One netizen in particular questioned the role of the Malaysian youth’s friend in the situation:

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Chan Chun Sing: Govt will create opportunities for all S’poreans, improve S’porean workers’ lives at every stage of career

The Government pledged to create opportunities for all Singaporeans regardless of their…

High living costs, low wages & purchasing power?

~by: Leong Sze Hian~ I refer to the latest issue of the…

重申“不放心让前囚犯当保安” 有色眼镜看前囚犯   林谋泉挨批 

在上周五(6月8日),蒙巴登国会议员林谋泉一则解释为何前囚犯不适合担任民居保安的脸书评论,引来网民抨击,除了愤慨林谋泉言论已偏离黄丝带运动的精神,也认为政府带着有色眼镜标签有前科者,打击他们重新展开新生活的信心。 林谋泉强调,要警方给第二次机会,说易行难。“如果你是公寓的居民,你会放心让一个在不久前(2016年)有犯罪记录的人当保安吗?有些人不介意,但其他人会。试问有多少家长会让小孩向一名前娈童犯学游泳?”他建议这名前囚犯可以在其他领域如销售或餐饮业任职。 事缘人民党成员乔立盟于本月6日在个人脸书专页揭露,一名居住在波东巴西的居民,在刑满出狱后一直寻找工作。他向新加坡警察部队申请保安执照时,后者鉴于他有前科,以“非恰当适任者”(not a fit and proper person)为由拒绝他的申请。 待业半年  要养4子女 事主向乔立盟申诉,申请德士执照也因有前科被拒。即使已通过保安课程,申请保安执照的过程仍被警方回绝。约30余岁的事主育有4子女,半年来一边找工作,一边打零工养活妻儿,若一直未有稳定收入,一家生计令人堪忧。 据乔立盟指出,事主是前正规步兵,只因在2016年不满妻子被搭讪,而殴伤一名建筑工友,致使事主被判入狱6个月。…

Help make a girl’s dream come true

Support Charmaine’s dream of being a published author.