Malaysia and Singapore Flags are waving in the sky (Photo by FreshStock from Shutterstock.com)

Malaysia and Singapore have always had a somewhat tense and strained relationship for two countries who are supposed to be close.

Geographically close, historically linked but distinctly different in governing approaches, these two countries share a rather unique and to a certain extent, special bond of two sovereign countries which were once part of one single nation post-British colonial rule.

Yet since Singapore left the federation in 1965 to stand as its own independent and separate country, many issues have turned into disputes and become the bane of contention between these two Asean member countries.

Maritime and airspace territorial disputes, land reclamation and raw water supply issues tended to boil over and cropped up time and again throughout the decades to test the two countries relationship. Even claims of food heritage such as nasi lemak and cendol would have citizens from both sides of the causeway going to war with each other through social media. To say that the relationship is testy would be an understatement.

The latest spat over Malaysian ships entering Singapore waters and that of Singapore’s new Seletar airport’s ILS encroaching Pasir Gudang airspace on the Malaysian side has triggered a fresh round of “squabbles”. On both sides, leaders and citizens are at each other’s throats yet again with “war of words” played out in both the main and online media.

Patriotic sentiments have been drummed up again as per the script of conflicts past. And perhaps this time around, a louder objection with a minister promising stern action against its wandering neighbor. This could be the accumulation of several issues within this half a year alone since Mahathir Mohamad took over from his predecessor. This time around, Singapore has chosen to “up the ante” by calling on its citizens to boycott Malaysian food import.

A need to flex muscles? To show strength as testament to Singapore’s sovereignty?

And on Malaysia’s part, the need to test its neighbour’s resolve at times?

Although the business community in both countries are calling for a peaceful solution to the strained bilateral relations that is steadily growing more tense and may threaten to complicate their business ventures, there is not much else to suggest that it would escalate into a diplomatic catastrophe.

These eruptions of tensions are nothing that people in both countries have not witnessed before.

How could two countries like Malaysia and Singapore who are, in essence siblings, even contemplate severing ties with each other, let alone declaring war?

The uncomfortable fact to stomach is that both countries need each other. History has proven that very clearly.

One its earliest, most pressing problem has always been the availability of a safe and stable supply of water for its citizens. Before its secession in 1965, Singapore was promised water supply by Malaysia through the state of Johore who has always regarded Singapore as a close relative. Indeed, Singapore was dependent on Malaysia for its water supply then and continues to rely on the 4 water agreements signed with its neighbor to provide its citizens with a constant water supply.

Half of Singapore’s current water supply flows from across the causeway from Johore. And until 2061 when the water agreement between the 2 countries expires Singapore becomes more self-sustaining with regard to its water supply, Malaysia remains de-facto water supplier to the island republic.

And due to its small size and thus lack of land for agricultural purposes, Malaysia is one of Singapore’s most crucial supplier of food and in particular fresh produce like fruits and vegetables as well as eggs and meats. Importing food from Malaysia is the fastest way compared to other countries such as France and Indonesia as that would mean transporting the food supply to the island country via air or sea. Live pigs are also imported from Malaysia.

Malaysia and Thailand have also had a very long and trying history yet both countries share an exceptionally close bond. Whether it is due to the centuries of shared cultural heritage or just great neighbourly relations, it is worth noting that not even Indonesia who supposedly have more in common with Malaysia get on so well with its neighbour.

Two countries that are sovereign and independent such as Malaysia and Singapore could and should demonstrate to the rest of the world how to live together in peace and harmony. In Mahathir’s own words, ”Malaysia and Singapore are like twins”.

What hurts one country also hurt the other one. More than half a century later, it is time to think and act together for a common good.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

5 Minutes With… Leong Sze Hian on wages

TOC asks Leong Sze Hian for his views on the Channel NewsAsia report which said that “wages grew strongly last year”. Is the report accurate? Sze Hian provides answers to some questions.

马废除消费税法案国会一读 9月务必落实销售税

马国政府于7月31日,在国会提呈三项税收法案,其中包括废除消费税法案、2018销售税法案和2018年服务税法案,并已经过一读程序。 上述法案是由副财政部长阿米鲁丁在下议院提呈,2018消费税(废除)法案,预计将在8月7日进入国会二读。 财长林冠英则呼吁反对党尊敬人民选择,不要尝试破坏联邦政府推动销售与服务税(SST),如果无法在9月1日开始落实销售税,就使政府陷入财务危机。 九月不落实  恐陷财务危机 “我们需要给人民和外资信心,确保我国政府财务运作顺畅。我们即便不满一马公司欠下的债务,但仍要偿还,因为这是政府承诺,如果跳票,会影响政府声誉和国际信用。” 他认为,要确保马国财务需要有盈余,销售税将成为收入保障。 假设9月仍未征收销售税,马国每个月将损失高达17亿5千万令吉的税收。 马国宣布在今年6月1日全国消费税调为0巴仙,而废除6巴仙消费税(GST)、重启销售与服务税(Sales tax & services…

Resting area for residents purported cleared by SLA for encroachment of state land

Once a unique resting place where senior citizens could seek shade and mingle…

Neo contradicts his former boss Kuek saying there is no “deep-seated cultural issues” in SMRT

At a media briefing today (16 Nov), the new SMRT CEO LG…