A video shared on Facebook shows a ‘Smart Tray Return’ robot in a food court, moving around with completely empty with a worker just behind it, cleaning up the tables.

The robot is supposed to be a positive addition to the food court scene in Singapore, to increase efficiency, but clearly the robot isn’t being used the way it should be, resulting in the need for manual labour still.

Now, the robot only works if customers are proactive in clearing their own table and returning the trays into the robot’s cavity – but not one does that. So in the end, the robot is better off being just a moving billboard.

The robot itself travels in a pre-determined circular route, pausing at intervals, and not giving way or recognising when there’s a person in its path. So not only is the robot waste of energy and space (because Singaporeans have yet to develop a habit of clearing their on trays), it’s also a hazard to the elderly.

Now, the stress on automation and artificial intelligence has been increasing these past few years with industries such as automotive, clothing, and other manufacturing industries utilising more robots. This move towards automation seems like the next step that many countries are taking in the name of development, and Singapore is no exception.

Two years ago in his 2016 National Day Rally Speech at ITE College Central, PM Lee talked about a local SME that was developing autonomous robots to be used in different settings from semiconductor plants and logistics warehouses to hospital. He praised them for finding new markets and creating new jobs.

That same year, the government announced a new Automation Support Package to support companies to automate, drive productivity and scale up. One component of the scheme includes a 100% Investment Allowance for automation equipment and a grant to support the rolling out of automation projects, like the ‘Smart Tray Return’ robot.

On the surface, it seems as though Singapore is ready for advancement, ready to tackle the next stage of development and wade head first into the world of automation. But although the technology may be ready, automation without a community that can learn how to work with it ends up being just a waste of time and energy.

The introduction of the robots in the food court is a smart idea and I can see where the company is coming from, trying to make things simpler for customers and stall owners. But if no one is using the robot for its intended purpose, then is it worth just letting it run around in circles?

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

What a mother really needs during the postnatal period

A group of final-year students from the Wee Kim Wee School of…

唐振辉伦敦“审问”脸书高层 质疑脸书监管平台内容不力

我国律政部兼卫生部高级政务部长唐振辉,出席于伦敦举行的国际假新闻及假消息委员会听证大会。会上他对脸书表达质疑,是否能相信脸书对于平台上出现的仇恨、争议性内容,能作出正确的评估和判断。 他在会上质问脸书公司政策解决方案副总监查德-艾伦,脸书是否禁止用户在网络上攻击他人、宗教、种族和散播仇恨情绪,如有发现,脸书是否会及时移除? 他举例,在今年三月斯里兰卡出现的一则脸书贴文引起争议,帖文称要”杀死所有穆斯林,连婴儿也不放过“。唐振辉说,这已是很明显的仇恨贴文。 有关贴文最终引起斯里兰卡陷入佛教徒和穆斯林爆发冲突、清真寺被攻击,致使政府被迫宣布戒严。连该国时任通讯部长费南多也曾质问,为何脸书拒绝拿下该贴文。 艾伦尝试解释,该贴文理应当时就被移除,不过唐振辉则追问,当时用户在投诉后还有收到反馈,所以脸书是确实收到投诉的,而且还回应有关贴文”未违反脸书社群守则“。 艾伦:”这绝对是失误,确实有人做错了…“ 唐振辉:”艾伦先生,我想这是很严重的失误,你承认吗?“ 艾伦:”是的,我承认。“ 唐振辉:”这违反了脸书会马上移除(仇恨贴文)的政策,这是否显示我们不能相信脸书,对于平台上的内容,有能力作出正确的评估判断?“ 艾伦:”不…. 我们出现失误“唐振辉:”是严重的失误“,艾伦:对,严重的失误,但我们必须减少这些失误,我们投资在人工智能,拓展仇恨字眼词典,以侦测平台上发文者和留言者发布的仇恨内容。” 唐振辉:是否等政府封锁脸书?…

Freedom of expression: UN expert alarmed by sentencing of teenager blogger

GENEVA (8 July 2015) – The United Nations Special Rapporteur on freedom…

DPP in Parti’s case used to join perm sec dad in expensive French cooking escapade in Paris

It was reported yesterday that Liew Mun Leong’s former maid, Parti Liyani,…