Blu Jaz Cafe (Image by Blu Jaz Cafe / Facebook)

Singapore’s beloved Blu Jaz Cafe has had its public entertainment license revoked on 10th October meaning that they will no longer be able to hold any live performances or jam sessions.

Described as the last remaining pillar in Singapore for the music scene, Blu Jaz has been a lively gathering space for musicians and music lovers around Singapore for the past 12 years.

In a passionate post on reddit, one user lamented the revocation of the license of “one of the last standing venues for jazz, poetry slam, stand-up and amateur music community development”. The user spoke about how Blu Jaz has been an integral part of the jazz community in Singapore, a place where novice musicians could perform, try new things and learn from each other and other more well-established musicians who also frequent the cafe.

According to owner Aileen Tan, Blu Jaz’s license was revoked due to several violations. In June 2016 and 2017, there was a ‘noise issue’ and a ‘failure to ensure windows and doors remained closed’ while in April and May 2018, there were two offences of overcrowding by 20% beyond capacity.

As if in confirmation of overcrowding, the reddit post indicated that “every jam session is so crowded that the jammers have to all stand and squeeze, sometimes even moving in and out of the room to let others have their turn”.

However, the owner of Blu Jaz submitted an appeal to the police after receiving notice that their license was set to be revoked in which she stressed that steps had been taken to address the issue of overcrowding and noise.

The appeal was nonetheless rejected and the police are forging ahead with their decision.

Blu Jaz has start an online petition in an effort to help retain their public entertainment license. The petition has over 4,000 signatures.

Now, Blu Jaz will still remain open but everyone agrees that live music was and is the ‘soul’ of the venue and without that it becomes just another bar. In the past two years, several other jazz bars have shut down in quick successions including places like B28, Artistry Cafe, and Sing Jazz Club, as pointed out on reddit.

It seems the jazz scene in Singapore is gradually disappearing into the abyss.

Rightly so, many Blu Jaz frequent patrons have pointed out that the arts scene in Singapore is not conducive to building local talent, especially now that the last live jazz bar is no longer holding live performances.

Sure, venues like Esplanade are available for anyone to use as a performance venue but it’s still too expensive for small bands and amateur performers to rent out. Blu Jaz and other places like it provided a fertile ground for a booming arts scene that encouraged growth and exploration – something that a massive, highly administrated venue can never provide.

One response on reddit read “Not Singaporean but lived there for work for the best part of a year. It’s a lovely place, but even though I’m not particularly cultured I couldn’t shake the feeling it was just too sterile. One of the stories I still tell people to explain this feeling is how in the same month the government announced a plan to foster the arts AND jailed an artist who did some street art to protest the demolition her granddads house to build a highway. Would rather live there than anywhere else in Asia, but was always saddened by how close the city flirted with greatness but still missed it.”

That story hits the nail on the head when it comes to Singapore’s approach to the arts. The world-class city with world-class facilities attracting world-class artists and performers are all great for Singapore’s image as a cultural and creative hub but it doesn’t provide any common space where local talent can learn, grow, and flourish.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

More police resources could have prevented escalation of violence

By Terry Xu / Andrew Loh Lt Tiffany Neo of the Singapore…

COVID-19 pandemic gives opportunity for companies to share fairer, greener, more inclusive future, says Finance Minister

Just two years ago, Finance Minister Lawrence Wong, like other people around…

MOH confirms 407 additional cases of COVID-19; Brings total tally to 40,604

As of Sunday noon (14 June), the Ministry of Health (MOH) has…

尚穆根指有外力干预 许渊臣:《网络公民》从未接受任何国外款项

今早(25日),在南洋理工大学拉惹勒南国际关系研究院(RSIS),内政部长兼律政部长尚穆根出席有关外来干预策略与对应措施的研讨会,尚穆根声称新加坡在一定程度上已经面对外来势力的干预。 他认为政府不能采取放任做法,新加坡需要制定自己的法律来应对,并及时干预和调查敌意信息宣传(hostile information campaign)等威胁。 他更点名历史学者覃炳鑫和自由新闻工作者韩俐颖等人(还有流亡前学运领袖陈华彪律师),在去年8月30日前往马来西亚吉隆坡拜会马国首相敦马,吁请马哈迪带头把民主带到新加坡等东南亚国家。 然而,在当时陈华彪等人都已声明,是作为立场不同的新加坡非政府人物,希望了解敦马对马新未来关系的看法,并邀请他出席一项有关深化民主基础课题的演讲。 此外,尚穆根不忘挑起,覃炳鑫与韩俐颖也曾联名申请成立公司,但使用外国资金在新加坡推动民主和人权等课题。 指《网络公民》聘外国人撰写负面文章 他也点名本社,聘用外国人撰写有关新加坡政治的负面文章,包括一些可破坏社会凝聚力的煽动性文章。 他声称,有关”攻击总理李显龙人格“的文章,据公开信息显示,就出自马国人之手,而他质疑,究竟是谁付薪水给她以及有什么目的。 有关文章目前正面对诉讼,不过他表示他并非对有关文章的法律事项发表评论,惟他想指出有马国作者撰写这些文章。他也质问,本社的(脸书)14名管理员中,有九位都不在新加坡,“我们不知道他们是谁,他们是新加坡人吗?” 他也指出,“一些新闻网站”有不知名的供稿者这让他们可能受到外国利益影响,例如刊载煽动性文章攻击或加深分化。…