Photo from Straits Times

Member of Parliament (MP) for Nee Soon Group Representation Constituency (GRC), Louis Ng has proposed charging for single-use carrier bags in a bid to reduce waste in Singapore. This proposal appears to be backed up by Senior Minister of State for Environment and Water Resources, Amy Khor, who said that managing plastics and packaging waste is one of the “key priorities” for her ministry. While I wholeheartedly agree with these suggestions, I query how united the government actually is in relation to waste reduction.

I have no doubt with regards to Ng’s sincerity. He has always been a tireless advocate for the environment. Yet, I cannot help but notice that what Ng and Khor have said seems to contradict what Environment and Water Resources Minister Masagos Zulkifli had said earlier this year. His famous words were: “If you want me to charge for plastic bags I can. But I don’t think that’s how we want to be as a society” Is this a change of heart by the relevant government departments or is there disagreement within the ranks? If it is the latter, then I have questions in relation to how Ng’s suggestions will be implemented.

Plastic bags contribute significantly to our plastic waste as a nation. According to 2016 statistics, Singapore discarded 27 billion plastic bags, an average of 13 bags per person per day. It therefore seems entirely like a no brainer to target this as a start.

Given that Khor has pledged the commitment of her department to plastic waste reduction, why is there hesitation when it comes to plastic bags? Why is the Ministry of Environment and Water Resources so reticent? What else is there to monitor? The statistics of waste are black and white. Besides, what is so wrong with being a society that charges for plastic bags? Isn’t that a sign of progressive responsibility? Aren’t we a first world country?

Ng’s reasoning for why carrier bags should be chargeable is sound. It would also be entirely in line with the government’s other environmental pursuits which range from solar panels for HDB flats to the building of eco friendly buildings. Singapore has a high incidence of plastic waste which is contrary to the high profile eco friendly projects which we have embarked upon.  There is no point in building large scale eco buildings if we cannot even get the basics rights. Surely it is easier and cheaper for the government to charge for plastic bags than to build solar panels.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

A sign that there may not be a walkover after all?

Two weeks back, I wrote about three reasons why we can expect…

Singapore needs to move away from its broken system of COE

In this opinion piece by Robin Low, he argues that motorcycle dealerships in Singapore have been exploiting the Certificate of Entitlement (COE) system, causing hardship for lower-income families and delivery businesses. He points out the flaws in the COE and Temporary COE (tCOE) systems and calls for a reevaluation of the approach, particularly regarding electric motorcycles, in order to create a more equitable and sustainable future.

Heavy rains and flooding pummel US northeast, one dead

Heavy rain and flooding wreaked havoc across several northeastern US states, causing flash floods, washed-out highways, and claiming one life. Flood warnings were in effect, and states like New York, New Jersey, and Connecticut experienced “life-threatening” conditions.

Fancy taking on two jobs for one salary? One PAP MP thinks it’s a great idea

by Augustine Low During the first two days of parliamentary speeches, one…