Connect with us

Current Affairs

Meeting was not about undermining Singapore, rather partly about solving congestion problems at Causeway immigration checkpoints: Tan Wah Piow

Published

on

In light of the controversy that arose as a result of his meeting with Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad, Singapore-born lawyer in exile Tan Wah Piow has clarified that there was more than one purpose to meeting the Prime Minister.

While the primary aim was to extend an invitation to him to deliver a keynote address at a conference on democracy next year, which the Prime Minister had accepted “in principle”, Mr Tan said that the issue regarding the current immigration checkpoint system at the Causeway was also part of the agenda.

“Our secondary mission [for the meeting] was about improving the the CIQ checkpoints on the Johor side, so that foot and bus passengers need not endure hours of queueing,” said Mr Tan.

He added that the proposal, which was “backed by a written schematic advice prepared by one of the top traffic planners from Malaysia, was given to Dr Mahathir during the meeting.

“The technical detail is speed of clearance, with everything being equal. How many points of clearance, how much time to clear one pax, et cetera … Hence, we sought expert advice, and try to encourage political determination to solve the jam,” said Mr Tan.

TOC understands that Hassan Karim, Member of Parliament of Pasir Gudang, is also an interested party.

Transportation planning and traffic management expert Dr Tai Tuck Leong’s letter to Mr Tan and Mr Hishammuddin Rais regarding proposed solutions to the congestion at immigration checkpoints at the Johor Bahru-Woodlands Causeway, dated 23rd Aug 2018.

Over 300,000 Malaysians travel across the Johor Bahru-Woodlands Causeway daily, making it “one of the busiest overland border crossings in the region”, according to a Channel NewsAsia interactive report.

Most of the commuters are Malaysians who are employed in Singapore, who brave the daily congestion due to the favourable currency exchange rate from Singapore Dollars to the Malaysian Ringgit.

It is estimated by the authorities that approximately 145,000 vehicles pass through Johor Bahru’s Customs, Immigration and Quarantine (CIQ) complex daily, according to the infographic.

Photo of the queue CIQ on the day of the forum, “Can Singapore do a Malaysia?” on Saturday, 18 Aug 2018.

The commute from Johor Bahru across the 1 km-long Causeway bridge takes around one to two hours on weekdays, with travellers observing longer waiting and travelling times on weekends and public holidays.

Currently, the authorities of both Singapore and Malaysia have put into place various solutions to reduce congestion at the Johor Bahru-Woodlands Causeway. This includes reducing tolls at Tuas Second Link, and increasing the frequency of the Keretapi Tanah Melayu Berhad’s (KTMB) Tebrau Shuttle between JB Sentral and Woodlands.

The state government of Johor, under the new Pakatan Harapan administration, is also seeking to introduce interim solutions such as travellators, and permanent ones such as the Rapid Transit System (RTS) rail link, which will connect Johor Bahru’s Bukit Chagar station to the upcoming Woodlands North MRT station.

Mr Tan elaborated that the proposed solutions “will soon be pursued by our collaborators in Johor, and when implemented, will benefit several hundred thousand Malaysians working in Singapore, as well as Singaporeans travelling to Malaysia for work or pleasure”.

“This is a tangible People to People Initiative which we hope could come to fruition.”

Mr Tan Wah Piow and Mr Hishamuddin Rais having a chat while waiting to meet Dr Mahathir Mohamad on 30 Aug. Photo courtesy of Mr Tan Wah Piow

Drawing from an anecdote from their meeting, Mr Tan recalled: “We [he and Mr Hishammuddin] joked about our common fate: I could not cross the border to go home, he could not enter Singapore to perform his stand-up comedy.”

“Since both our friends in Singapore had to endure hours of queueing at JB CIQ before meeting us, we might as well ask Dr M to consider Dr Tai’s proposition,” adding that at the meeting, “Hisham reminded him [Dr Mahathir] of the thousands of Malaysians in Singapore”.

“The fact that we approached Dr Mahathir to solve a specific issue is a rebuttal against the allegation that the political objective was to undermine Singapore,” said Mr Tan. Mr Tan fled to London in 1976 after being arrested, and sentenced to imprisonment after being found guilty of allegedly inciting a riot with workers, which he strongly denies as he says he had been framed.

The Singapore government subsequently pinpointed him as the mastermind behind the 1987 Marxist Conspiracy, which led to the launch of Operation Spectrum. 22 persons were detained without trial in this security sweep for allegedly plotting to overthrow the government.

Shortly after, Mr Tan’s citizenship was revoked under section 135(1) of the Singapore constitution for being a resident outside Singapore for a continuous period of 10 years. Mr Tan currently resides in the United Kingdom.

Other individuals present at the 30 Aug meeting were Singaporean historian Dr Thum Ping Tjin, freelance journalist Kirsten Han, social worker Jolovan Wham and award-winning graphic novelist Sonny Liew, and veteran Malaysian political activist Hishamuddin Rais, who is also a member of Mr Tan’s organisation, Forces for the Renewal of Southeast Asia. Mr Hishamuddin Rais was involved in organising the meeting.

On 1 Sept, MP Seah Kian Peng published a Facebook post, alleging historian Dr Thum had “invited Dr Mahathir to ‘bring democracy to Singapore’ and suggested that Singapore is part of Malaya.

The ensuing controversy resulted in claims that Dr Thum and others present were traitors. Minister of Home Affairs and Law, Mr K Shanmugam also added to the controversy by suggesting that Thum and the rest had invited foreign powers to intervene in Singapore politics.

Continue Reading
Click to comment
Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Current Affairs

TJC issued 3rd POFMA order under Minister K Shanmugam for alleged falsehoods

The Transformative Justice Collective (TJC) was issued its third POFMA correction order on 5 October 2024 under the direction of Minister K Shanmugam for alleged falsehoods about death penalty processes. TJC has rejected the government’s claims, describing POFMA as a tool to suppress dissent.

Published

on

The Transformative Justice Collective (TJC), an advocacy group opposed to the death penalty, was issued its third Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act (POFMA) correction direction on 5 October 2024.

The correction was ordered by Minister for Home Affairs and Law, K Shanmugam, following TJC’s publication of what the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) alleges to be false information regarding Singapore’s death row procedures and the prosecution of drug trafficking cases.

These statements were made on TJC’s website and across its social media platforms, including Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, and X (formerly Twitter).

In addition to TJC, civil activist Kokila Annamalai was also issued a correction direction by the minister over posts she made on Facebook and X between 4 and 5 October 2024.

According to MHA, these posts echoed similar views on the death penalty and the legal procedures for drug-related offences, and contained statements that the ministry claims are false concerning the treatment of death row prisoners and the state’s legal responsibilities in drug trafficking cases.

MHA stated that the posts suggested the government schedules and stays executions arbitrarily, without due regard to legal processes, and that the state does not bear the burden of proving drug trafficking charges.

However, these alleged falsehoods are contested by MHA, which maintains that the government strictly follows legal procedures, scheduling executions only after all legal avenues have been exhausted, and that the state always carries the burden of proof in such cases.

In its official release, MHA emphasised, “The prosecution always bears the legal burden of proving its case beyond a reasonable doubt, and this applies to all criminal offences, including drug trafficking.”

It also pointed to an article on the government fact-checking site Factually to provide further clarification on the issues raised.

As a result of these allegations, both TJC and Annamalai are now required to post correction notices. TJC must display these corrections on its website and social media platforms, while Annamalai is required to carry similar notices on her Facebook and X posts.

TikTok has also been issued a targeted correction direction, requiring the platform to communicate the correction to all Singapore-based users who viewed the related TJC post.

In a statement following the issuance of the correction direction, TJC strongly rejected the government’s claims. The group criticised the POFMA law, calling it a “political weapon used to crush dissent,” and argued that the order was more about the exercise of state power than the pursuit of truth. “We have put up the Correction Directions not because we accept any of what the government asserts, but because of the grossly unjust terms of the POFMA law,” TJC stated.

TJC further argued that the government’s control over Singapore’s media landscape enables it to push pro-death penalty views without opposition. The group also stated that it would not engage in prolonged legal battles over the POFMA correction orders, opting to focus on its abolitionist work instead.

This marks the third time TJC has been subject to a POFMA correction direction in recent months.

The group was previously issued two orders in August 2024 for making similar statements concerning death row prisoners.

In its latest statement, MHA noted that despite being corrected previously, TJC had repeated what the ministry views as falsehoods.

MHA also criticised TJC for presenting the perspective of a convicted drug trafficker without acknowledging the harm caused to victims of drug abuse.

Annamalai, a prominent civil rights activist, is also known for her involvement in various social justice campaigns. She was charged in June 2024 for her participation in a pro-Palestinian procession near the Istana. Her posts, now subject to correction, contained information similar to those presented by TJC regarding death penalty procedures and drug-related cases.

POFMA, which was introduced in 2019, allows the government to issue correction directions when it deems falsehoods are being spread online.

Critics of the law argue that it can be used to suppress dissent, while the government asserts that it is a necessary tool for combating misinformation. The law has been frequently invoked against opposition politicians and activists.

As of October 2024, Minister K Shanmugam has issued 17 POFMA directions, more than any other minister. Shanmugam, who was instrumental in introducing POFMA, is followed by National Development Minister Desmond Lee, who has issued 10 POFMA directions.

Major media outlets, including The Straits Times, Channel News Asia, and Mothership, have covered the POFMA directions. However, as of the time of writing, none have included TJC’s response rejecting the government’s allegations.

Continue Reading

Current Affairs

Hotel Properties Limited suspends trading ahead of Ong Beng Seng’s court hearing

Hotel Properties Limited (HPL), co-founded by Mr Ong Beng Seng, has halted trading ahead of his court appearance today (4 October). The announcement was made by HPL’s company secretary at about 7.45am, citing a pending release of an announcement. Mr Ong faces one charge of abetting a public servant in obtaining gifts and another charge of obstruction of justice. He is due in court at 2.30pm.

Published

on

SINGAPORE: Hotel Properties Limited (HPL), the property and hotel developer co-founded by Mr Ong Beng Seng, has requested a trading halt ahead of the Singapore tycoon’s scheduled court appearance today (4 October) afternoon.

This announcement was made by HPL’s company secretary at approximately 7.45am, stating that the halt was due to a pending release of an announcement.

Mr Ong, who serves as HPL’s managing director and controlling shareholder, faces one charge under Section 165, accused of abetting a public servant in obtaining gifts, as well as one charge of obstruction of justice.

He is set to appear in court at 2.30pm on 4 October.

Ong’s charges stem from his involvement in a high-profile corruption case linked to former Singaporean transport minister S Iswaran.

The 80-year-old businessman was named in Iswaran’s initial graft charges earlier this year.

These charges alleged that Iswaran had corruptly received valuable gifts from Ong, including tickets to the 2022 Singapore Formula 1 Grand Prix, flights, and a hotel stay in Doha.

These gifts were allegedly provided to advance Ong’s business interests, particularly in securing contracts with the Singapore Tourism Board for the Singapore GP and the ABBA Voyage virtual concert.

Although Iswaran no longer faces the original corruption charges, the prosecution amended them to lesser charges under Section 165.

Iswaran pleaded guilty on 24 September, 2024, to four counts under this section, which covered over S$400,000 worth of gifts, including flight tickets, sports event access, and luxury items like whisky and wines.

Additionally, he faced one count of obstructing justice for repaying Ong for a Doha-Singapore flight shortly before the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB) became involved.

On 3 October, Iswaran was sentenced to one year in jail by presiding judge Justice Vincent Hoong.

The prosecution had sought a sentence of six to seven months for all charges, while the defence had asked for a significantly reduced sentence of no more than eight weeks.

Ong, a Malaysian national based in Singapore, was arrested by CPIB in July 2023 and released on bail shortly thereafter. Although no charges were initially filed against him, Ong’s involvement in the case intensified following Iswaran’s guilty plea.

The Attorney-General’s Chambers (AGC) had earlier indicated that it would soon make a decision regarding Ong’s legal standing, which has now led to the current charges.

According to the statement of facts read during Iswaran’s conviction, Ong’s case came to light as part of a broader investigation into his associates, which revealed Iswaran’s use of Ong’s private jet for a flight from Singapore to Doha in December 2022.

CPIB investigators uncovered the flight manifest and seized the document.

Upon learning that the flight records had been obtained, Ong contacted Iswaran, advising him to arrange for Singapore GP to bill him for the flight.

Iswaran subsequently paid Singapore GP S$5,700 for the Doha-Singapore business class flight in May 2023, forming the basis of his obstruction of justice charge.

Mr Ong is recognised as the figure who brought Formula One to Singapore in 2008, marking the first night race in the sport’s history.

He holds the rights to the Singapore Grand Prix. Iswaran was the chairman of the F1 steering committee and acted as the chief negotiator with Singapore GP on business matters concerning the race.

 

Continue Reading

Trending