Friday, 29 September 2023

We are shifting our daily news to Gutzy.Asia Support us there!

Forest City proves buying an overseas home is to buy a cat in a sack

Malaysia leader Mahathir Mohamad organized a five-day official visit to China. Besides asking China to withhold two major Chinese infrastructure projects, an agreement was reached to directly import the whole fruit of Malaysian durians to China.

As early as 2019, thousand tons of Mao Shan Wang will be exported to different provinces in mainland China.

Foreigners are not welcome

While working on stronger ties with China, Mahathir didn’t forget about Forest City. The island development that is set to be built near the second link between Singapore and Malaysia.

Last Monday, the Malaysia Prime Minister said at a press conference that foreigners will not be allowed to buy residential units at the Country Garden project. They also won’t be granted visas to come and live there.

As I mentioned in my podcast “Mahathir, China Projects and Forest City”, Mahathir has been uneasy with the astronomical amount of Chinese investment in Malaysia even before the election. And Forest City has always been a thorn in his eye.

He once said, “I hope Forest City will truly become a forest … Its residents will consist of baboons, monkeys and so on.”

Look like Mahathir is determined to make Forest City to live up to its name as a residence for wild animals rather than for humans.

Blame it on politics

Meanwhile, Country Garden clarified that they just held a closed-door meeting with Mahathir before his Beijing trip that ended with a positive note. Above all, Forest City had obtained all necessary approvals to sell to foreign buyers.

So what?

The Singapore-Malaysia water agreement was concluded by both governments long time ago in 1962. Official agreement to build the high-speed rail was confirmed back in 2013.

When the ruling party changes, everything starts on a new page.

Mahathir is showing the world that he is the pilot of the passenger flight. He makes the key decisions on takeoff and landing. He doesn’t talk one to one with the passengers but only communicates through the microphone.

You will hear his initiative and decision from the Malaysia local media. You have to sit back and wait for your turn to get any clarification or confirmation from the relevant authority.

The new Prime Minister is obviously playing his nationalist card to further strengthen his political position in Malaysia.

After all, Malaysia is only following the global trend to restrict foreigners from buying properties in the country. It is also handy to leverage on the worldwide angst against the cash-rich Chinese by blaming Chinese buyers for rising home prices.

At a time when New Zealand bans foreigners from buying existing properties; when Singapore just slaps a 25 percent Additional Buyer Stamp Duty on foreigners buying private homes, what is the big deal of controlling the foreign ownership of only one project in the Johor State?

Foreign buyers are at the mercy of policy changes

Besides, the $100 billion Forest City megaproject is an easy target. It is a white elephant built for foreigners. Locals can hardly afford to buy those homes and are unlikely to benefit from the luxury development.

Mahathir once commented, “The Chinese are coming in here, buying land, developing luxurious towns, is not beneficial for us.”

Some media use strong words like “crackdown” or “clampdown” to describe Malaysia’s curb on foreign buyers in the Iskandar project.

Since when, did foreigners investing in overseas properties become a crime?

When a government rolls out a grand development plan, the country welcomes foreign direct investment and appreciates foreign investors to inject huge capital, bring in new technologies and create job opportunities.

But once the government decides to pull the brake, the country can interpret foreign investment as an unscrupulous act to seize land in their country, deprive the locals of their housing rights as a modern form of colonization.

This is exactly what I mean when I talk about political and legal risks in my blog post “3 biggest risks buying overseas properties”.

Regulations that restrict foreign property ownership can change from time to time, or even worse, change overnight with no prior notice. Local government can step in any time to turn the tables and change the rules of the game.

Unlike the locals, overseas buyers and foreign owners don’t have the rights to be consulted, or to debate, object and protest. They are entirely at the mercy of the policy makers.

Bad reputation is a big weakness in negotiations

So what is the bargaining power of a foreign developer like Country Garden in Malaysia?

The largest developer in China is running out of luck recently in their country. On top of frequent work accidents amidst tight completion deadlines, poor quality control is also a big damage to Country Garden’s reputation.

A China property agent told the Hong Kong media that he is afraid of accompanying buyers of Country Garden projects to collect keys. Because owners are often shocked by the poor building quality and bad workmanship once they open the door.

There are incidents of collective actions of owners to return the keys to the developer and refuse to accept the units. This problem also caused widespread protests in different parts of China. (Read my earlier blog post on “4 things Country Garden’s hiccups tell us about developers“.)

Reputation is another card holding in Mahathir’s hands that he can play any time.

Selling the Chinese the dream of an international citizen

Why are two-thirds of Forest City’s buyers from China?

Chinese buyers sold on the project are mainly the middle class and SME owners. Like other Chinese nationals who are keen to leave the country, they long for clean air, safe food, western education and freedom.

Yet they are not eligible to migrate to western countries. They may lack the financial means to migrate as investment immigrants. But they do have some spare cash to invest.

The developer’s promise to help them apply for permanent resident status though Malaysia, My Second Home Programme is the best answer.

The developer’s plan to build international schools for their children is a cheaper alternative for their children’s education.

The developer’s projection of 700,000 residents by 2050 in a $100 billion project is the guarantee for a high return overseas investment.

According to the Prime Minister’s Office, purchase of properties does not guarantee automatic residency in the country. Only renewable multiple-entry social visit passes for 10 years will be issued to successful applicants through the Malaysia My Second Home programme.

In early August, the Shattuck St Mary’s International School near Forest City is opened. It is originally designed to accommodate 1,000 students. So far only 60 children have been enrolled in the new school.

To invest in an overseas property without due diligence is to buy a cat in a sack. When the developer let the cat out of the bag, naïve buyers have to face the consequences.

Interestingly, the Chinese citizens buying Forest City is similar to the Malaysian Mao Shan Wang exporting to China.

The durians are always eager to get out of the country – thinking that the grass is greener on the other side and they can be sold at a good profit there.

Little do they know that, with mass production and high volume export, supply will catch up with demand in no time.

Instead of traveling all the way to Malaysia or queuing at the durian festival, Chinese durian lovers can now buy the fruit in a nearby market or order online. Even people who can’t afford it previously can taste durians in the street.

When Mao Shan Wang is no longer a precious fruit reserved only for the privileged, who is going to pay a premium just to have a taste of it?

PropertySoul blogs at

Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Latest posts

Election surprises and certainties: Dissecting Tharman’s presidential win

In the 2023 Presidential Election, Mr. Tharman Shanmugaratnam secured a stunning 70.4% landslide victory, surprising many, including himself. Despite expectations that TKL would win the opposition votes, voters from both camps showed a preference for Tharman's charisma and perceived competency. As Singapore reflects on the outcome, questions arise about the election's fairness and the real implications of Tharman's dominant win.

Volunteer as a Polling and Counting Agent for Singapore’s 2023 Presidential Election

For the upcoming Singapore Presidential Election on 1st September, members of the civil society have spearheaded an initiative to strengthen our democratic fabric. We invite committed individuals to join us as Polling and Counting Agents, standing together for a transparent, fair, and just election. This vote counting exercise, organized by members of civil society, is not specifically in support of Mr Tan Kin Lian, a candidate in the upcoming Presidential Election. It's an exercise in active citizenry. Nonetheless, Mr Tan endorses this initiative, which hinges on his candidacy, championing transparency, and has given permission for the results to be shared publicly.

Reflections from the Centenary: The Legacy of LKY and Singapore’s Future

Gilbert Goh reflects on the LKY centenary event: an inspiring showcase of a leader's global legacy juxtaposed against current challenges, urging Singapore to continue its path of progress.

Lim Tean advocates for Tan Kin Lian: A visionary leader for Singapore’s Presidency

In his speech at Mr Tan Kin Lian's launch of his presidential bid, Mr Lim Tean passionately championed the need for a truly Independent President. Highlighting Mr Tan Kin Lian's unique credentials and genuine concern for the wellbeing of Singaporeans, the Peoples Voice leader emphasized the pressing challenges of rising living costs and job insecurities faced by the public. Mr Lim depicted Mr Tan Kin Lian as a beacon of hope for the nation, advocating for a leader who genuinely understands and represents the people’s aspirations.

Tan Jee Say endorses Tan Kin Lian for President: A courageous, genuine, and humble...

In advocating for a truly representative leader, Tan Jee Say underscored Tan Kin Lian's humility, courage, and genuine dedication. Highlighting the pressing need for restored public trust and effective independence, Tan Jee Say emphasized that Tan Kin Lian, as the 'People's President', would bring back hope to Singaporeans and champion true democracy

Tan Kin Lian’s pledge: Rekindling unity and charting a vigorous future for Singapore

In the press conference to announce his bid for the Singapore presidency, Tan Kin Lian emphasizes safeguarding Singapore's reserves and strengthening public service integrity. Drawing on his 30-year leadership at NTUC Income, he envisions a future with affordable living, accessible housing, and job stability, pledging collaboration with the government for a united nation.

Strengthening Singapore’s political foundations: A call to action by Leong Mun Wai on Singapore’s...

Leong Mun Wai urges Singaporeans to strengthen political checks and balances, emphasizing, 'The best is yet to be for Singapore if we dare to make the right decision in upcoming elections.

Trending posts