Friday, 22 September 2023

We are shifting our daily news to Gutzy.Asia Support us there!

Resentment for immigrants is created by a lack of government planning or foresight

Immigration is a hot button issue which has created controversy in the past and may continue to generate strong sentiments. On the one hand, they have been blamed for pushing up the costs of living, stretching our public transportation system and for allegedly stealing our jobs and pushing down wages.

On the other hand, they have been credited for doing the work that Singaporeans turn their noses up at and facilitating the lifestyles that we have grown accustomed to.

My personal view is that immigration has a positive impact in our country and we should welcome our new residents. However, the process in which visas and employment passes are granted have to be more streamlined and transparent. The objectives have to be clear with a long term plan as opposed to short term and disjointed forays in order to artificially plug some gap. Further, the city must be readied to accommodate the larger population. With well thought out city planning, strategic goals and immigration rules that are fair and clear, the resentment that some Singaporeans feel will dissipate.

Singapore is a small country and we live pretty much in each other’s faces. The government’s failure to adequately enhance the city’s facilities in order to accommodate the newcomers is bound to stretch the existing services causing frustration among the locals. Why didn’t the various government departments in charge of city planning, transport, housing and immigration not get together beforehand to formulate a joint up plan? Was it because it was done in such a hurry to plug some gap leaving inadequate time for thorough and holistic preparations?

Why are some visas granted while others in similar situations not? I don’t think there is a sinister plan at play. I simply think it is inefficiency caused by a lack of foresight. Instead of trying to think of solutions that solve the underlying problems, immigrants were and are brought in as a stop gap measure without any long term policy considerations. A lack of consistency will always fuel suspicion and dissatisfaction.

Singapore is fixated on the concept of Gross Domestic Product (GDP). That is a measure of our success and how well we are doing so much so that the Peoples’ Action Party (PAP) has equated the level of our GDP to our success as a country. This is however misleading. GDP measures the amount of production of a country. This can be anything ranging from building condos that no one lives in to shopping centres with no customers to refurbishing roads that are already in good condition. The level of GDP does not necessarily translate to a higher quality of life. It does not always mean greater prosperity. Rather, it can be massaged to create an image of false or inflated prosperity. Are immigrants brought in to beef up the GDP without a corresponding benefit to Singaporeans?

Bringing in foreigners also means that we should be responsible for them. We should not exploit those from poorer countries and feel entitled to pay them less and treat them as lesser beings. That is not the mark of a responsible host or civil society. Let’s look at the domestic workers and construction workers in our midst. They silently keep the country running by allowing parents to go to work, building our houses, roads and offices and looking after our aged. For this honour, they are paid low wages and work long hours. And at the end of it all, they have no rights to ever become permanent residents or citizens. Is this fair? Given that our country does not provide any welfare, why is there no right for them to remain? Is it racist?

I can go on and on but then dear reader, you will get bored so I will confine myself to these broad points which are hopefully demonstrated by the examples I have set out above. Without a concrete long term plan for why immigrants are required and the numbers, everything will be done in a disorganised and hap hazard fashion creating confusion and frustration.

If the government departments don’t work together, there will be no cohesion leading to overcrowding and resentment.

If the government has no intention of allowing a large percentage of our foreign workforce to remain (even if they have been here for 20 years), they are creating a parallel society whereby people do not integrate, a recipe for distrust and suspicion.

If the government is only bringing in immigrants as a short term solution to meet a need without solving the underlying problem, this will not solve the problem in the long run. It is also misleading the public!

Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Latest posts

Election surprises and certainties: Dissecting Tharman’s presidential win

In the 2023 Presidential Election, Mr. Tharman Shanmugaratnam secured a stunning 70.4% landslide victory, surprising many, including himself. Despite expectations that TKL would win the opposition votes, voters from both camps showed a preference for Tharman's charisma and perceived competency. As Singapore reflects on the outcome, questions arise about the election's fairness and the real implications of Tharman's dominant win.

Volunteer as a Polling and Counting Agent for Singapore’s 2023 Presidential Election

For the upcoming Singapore Presidential Election on 1st September, members of the civil society have spearheaded an initiative to strengthen our democratic fabric. We invite committed individuals to join us as Polling and Counting Agents, standing together for a transparent, fair, and just election. This vote counting exercise, organized by members of civil society, is not specifically in support of Mr Tan Kin Lian, a candidate in the upcoming Presidential Election. It's an exercise in active citizenry. Nonetheless, Mr Tan endorses this initiative, which hinges on his candidacy, championing transparency, and has given permission for the results to be shared publicly.

Reflections from the Centenary: The Legacy of LKY and Singapore’s Future

Gilbert Goh reflects on the LKY centenary event: an inspiring showcase of a leader's global legacy juxtaposed against current challenges, urging Singapore to continue its path of progress.

Lim Tean advocates for Tan Kin Lian: A visionary leader for Singapore’s Presidency

In his speech at Mr Tan Kin Lian's launch of his presidential bid, Mr Lim Tean passionately championed the need for a truly Independent President. Highlighting Mr Tan Kin Lian's unique credentials and genuine concern for the wellbeing of Singaporeans, the Peoples Voice leader emphasized the pressing challenges of rising living costs and job insecurities faced by the public. Mr Lim depicted Mr Tan Kin Lian as a beacon of hope for the nation, advocating for a leader who genuinely understands and represents the people’s aspirations.

Tan Jee Say endorses Tan Kin Lian for President: A courageous, genuine, and humble...

In advocating for a truly representative leader, Tan Jee Say underscored Tan Kin Lian's humility, courage, and genuine dedication. Highlighting the pressing need for restored public trust and effective independence, Tan Jee Say emphasized that Tan Kin Lian, as the 'People's President', would bring back hope to Singaporeans and champion true democracy

Tan Kin Lian’s pledge: Rekindling unity and charting a vigorous future for Singapore

In the press conference to announce his bid for the Singapore presidency, Tan Kin Lian emphasizes safeguarding Singapore's reserves and strengthening public service integrity. Drawing on his 30-year leadership at NTUC Income, he envisions a future with affordable living, accessible housing, and job stability, pledging collaboration with the government for a united nation.

Strengthening Singapore’s political foundations: A call to action by Leong Mun Wai on Singapore’s...

Leong Mun Wai urges Singaporeans to strengthen political checks and balances, emphasizing, 'The best is yet to be for Singapore if we dare to make the right decision in upcoming elections.

Trending posts