Opinion
Government u-turns again; Waiving the cost of swab tests for construction workers after implying that employers should pay
It has now been announced by the Building and Construction Authority (BCA) that the Government will waive the cost of swab tests for construction workers until August this year. This latest update comes after almost two weeks of speculation on whether or not employers will have to budget for these tests in the wake of statements by Minister for National Development, Lawrence Wong.
Construction companies were told that they would have to pay for their workers’ COVID-19 tests every two weeks which comes up to $400 per month if they were to commence work after the Circuit Breaker is lifted after 1 June.
Wong, who is also co chair of of the multi ministry taskforce, had said in an earlier press conference that as the government ramps up COVID-19 testing requirements on migrant workers, he had “no doubt” that “the company (employer) must bear the cost”.
Just like the “whether or not to wear mask” saga, it is yet another policy U turn? Why is that the case?
While there is a need for employers to be responsible in looking after their workers, we need to look at things in context. We must not forget that our government policies allowed for the migrant workers to be housed in the manner that they were. We must also bear in mind that the government did not act in February when the first migrant worker infection was made public.
In that regard, the government did unwittingly enable the rampant spread of the corona virus within the migrant worker community. Looking at the situation holistically, is it fair to push the entire brunt of the costs on the businesses in the first place?
Without going too much into the merits of who should bear the costs, what is concerning is the government’s seeming policy inconsistencies where COVID-19 is concerned. Or rather, are members of the government speaking to the press before consulting with industry groups or other members of the government?
Is there a strategy or is the government just reacting to situations as they arise?
In a time of crisis, the seeming “yo-yoing” of policies might create a sense of disquiet. It might also result in speculation and the proliferation of unsubstantiated rumours.
As stated by Minister for Law, K Shanmugam, the government is concerned about the spread of untruths. However, if the government appears to be shifting on decisions and instructions at a time of crisis, the ground will be ripe for rumours. Why target the effects instead of the underlying cause?
Arguably, the coronavirus is the worst crisis that our young country has ever faced. With this pandemic as the backdrop, the government needs to ensure that its messaging is consistent. Otherwise, it runs the risk of looking indecisive in the battle against the virus. This is not a reassuring image.
-
Politics5 days ago
Tan See Leng and K Shanmugam threaten Bloomberg with legal action over GCB transaction report
-
Crime2 weeks ago
Singapore police did not arrest fugitive due to no request from China
-
Property1 week ago
Bloomberg: Nearly half of 2024 GCB transactions lack public record, raising transparency concerns
-
International2 weeks ago
Israel conducts large-scale military operations in Syria and seizes Golan Heights positions
-
Opinion5 days ago
Ho Ching defends NRIC as “digital name,” calls for practical policies over secrecy
-
Opinion21 hours ago
Government’s backtracking on NRIC unmasking and the miscommunication excuse
-
Community1 week ago
Hougang knife attack: Dispute over medical claim reportedly leads to mother of three’s death
-
Politics2 weeks ago
Parties may not display face of individuals other than party leader: ELD