N Surendran speaking to the press

Below is the statement issued by N Surendran and Latheefa Koya, lawyers acting on behalf of S Prabagaran & K Datchinamurthy who are currently on death row in Singapore.
We refer to the cases of Malaysians S Prabagaran and K Datchinamurthy who are on death row in Singapore’s Changi Prison on charges of drug trafficking. They have strenuously maintained their innocence, and repeatedly complained that they have been deprived of a fair trial due to a flagrant breach of the doctrine of separation of powers.
We are appalled that despite our repeated requests, we have been denied access to both our clients in Changi prison. We require access as it is imperative for us to consult with and receive instructions from our clients for the purpose of two appeals filed by them, now pending before the Court of Appeal in Putrajaya.
Both appeals are directly related to their convictions for drug trafficking in Singapore; in the appeals, they seek for orders to direct the Malaysian government to lodge a complaint against Singapore in the ICJ for depriving them of a fair trial.
Our applications for access were rejected by the Singapore Prison Services without any reasons being given.
Access to lawyers and to the courts is a fundamental right, which cannot be interfered with.
In 2005, Australian Nguyen Tuong Van who was also on death row for drug trafficking, was allowed access to his Australian lawyers.
Why then are Prabagaran and Datchinamurthy refused access to their Malaysian lawyers? Why are different standards being applied between Australian and Malaysian prisoners by Singapore authorities?
Further, Malaysian prison authorities have allowed access to Singapore lawyer M Ravi in the case Attiqa, a Singaporean who was facing a capital charge in Malaysia. Surely, Singapore should reciprocate and allow us access to our clients.
The Malaysian government cannot continue to remain silent over this fundamental breach of the rights of these two Malaysian citizens. Malaysia must take up the matter immediately with Singapore and demand that access to Malaysian lawyers be allowed forthwith.
We urge the Malaysian government to act decisively and expeditiously as the lives of two of our citizens are hanging in the balance.
 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

MOH confirms additional 573 cases of COVID-19 infection; Total tally at 18,778 cases

As of Monday noon(4 May), the Ministry of Health (MOH) has confirmed…

Lee Weiling presents email which contradicts PM Lee's statutory declaration to Ministerial Committee

Dr Lee Weiling has released an email from Janadas Devan, Chief of…

高盛承认属下二高职涉一马案 须归还5.88亿美元予马国

据《华尔街日报》报道,高盛(Goldman Sachs)公司承认,属下二职员涉及一马公司案,可能让该公司面对“可观的罚款”。该公司因司法诉讼的损失将高达18亿美元(约25亿新元)。 高盛上周五向美国证券交易委员会提呈的“第三季盈利报告”时表示,其前雇员涉及一马公司的贿赂及洗钱,公司因此可能面对巨额罚款。 不过报告强调,高盛已经加强其监管机制。报告指雷斯纳(Tim Leissner)及黄宗华(Roger Ng Chong Hwa)“绕过公司内部审计机制,同时蓄意欺骗监管者及内部委员会。” 对此,马来西亚财政部长林冠英则披露,高盛公司必须归还与一马公司合作所支付的5.88亿美元费用。 高盛在2012至2013年期间,通过3笔债券发行为1MDB筹资近65亿美元,并在交易中取得近6亿美元的佣金,远远超过银行助发债预期可获得的1至2%正常收费。 英国《金融时报》日前指,高盛集团总执行长大卫所罗门与前总执行长贝兰克梵等超过30名高管,都曾审查该公司与一马公司的交易。 据报道,美国司法部在一项声明称,政府11月1日已在大马逮捕高盛集团前银行家黄宗华。…

A disgraceful act of bullying

~by: Ghui~ ‘Teens fist just came out at me’ – it is…