Source : Priyageetha Dia Facebook account.

An art student from Lasalle College of the Arts, Ms Priyageetha Dia, paved a staircase with gold foil at a Housing Board block in Jalan Besar.
Many netizens praised the artwork, saying that this is creativity at its best.
This is despite the fact that the Jalan Besar Town Council stated what she did was “unauthorised” and “not permissible”. But the town council has stated that it is reaching out to the art student to explore future collaboration.
A spokesperson for the Town Council told Today that it wants to “explore ways in which we may be able to work together” as it is “supportive of efforts by the community to enhance our living environment”.
Ms Priyageetha has admitted on her Facebook account on Tuesday (7 March) that she was the person behind the art, saying that the work has been on her mind for the past one month and that she was definitely apprehensive on realising it until two days ago.
“The process was an invigorating one though I was apprehensive of the consequences I may face,” she said.
Ms Priyageetha said that it took her five hours to get the work done.

“My practice deals with spaces that negotiate concepts on the sacred, secular and the profane. As such, I am intrigued with spaces that I have inhabited over the course of 25 years as a HDB dweller and thus it has prompted me to intervene away from the household and into public spaces,” the art student stated. But what constitutes public and private space? How does that apply along with the sacred etc.? And why gold? I would love to list down the conceptual reasoning of what the work is about but wouldn’t it make the work seem less interesting then?”
“But what constitutes public and private space? How does that apply along with the sacred etc.? And why gold? I would love to list down the conceptual reasoning of what the work is about but wouldn’t it make the work seem less interesting then?” she asked.
She then asked whether it is possible to draw a line between art and vandalism, as she considers this work as an art and not vandalism.
She then noted that though one would say about the legal system and its regulations but she believes that she did not deface anything, adding that what she did was to enhance the space and her surroundings.
“This work provokes. Provokes in all sense we are used to living the standard way of life, and all of a sudden something as glaring as gold negotiates the space. My work does not seek to obliterate a public space; vandalism in all sense has no respect for another individual,” said Ms Priyageetha.
She added, “I didn’t intend to please the public with my work but it was definitely a sense of satisfaction for me. After practising arts under the academy for almost 3 years, I needed to break away from that zone. What better way to make art and have it on display beyond the white cube,”
While it is believed that no Police complaints has been lodged, there were mixed comments on the incident by the resident who live around the area.
In an interview by Today, Ms Akiko Ler, 43, felt that such an act, if done on the artist’s own accord without seeking counsel from the town council, is considered vandalism, saying that residents here pay fees to keep the public space clean, so it is only fair that it is kept like how it was meant to be.
Mr Don Tan, 22, said that he is seeing it from both the perspective of the artist as well as the law, stating that it is a grey area because it does not affect people’s lives. However, he noted that it causes little trouble or inconvenience.
Another resident, Tiffany Tan, 22, said that the art is a “cool” thing.
She said that it will be quite sad if someone orders it to be taken down. However, she noted that even if it stays, the artwork may not be appreciated as much without proper recognition of it as an artwork.
“Someone might just treat it the same as any other stairway and spit on it,” she added.
Source : Priyageetha Dia Facebook account.
Source : Priyageetha Dia Facebook account.
Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Medisave: Needy forced to go to private clinics?

by Leong Sze Hian I  refer to the reply by Marine Parade…

Ho Ching asks Malaysian politician to ‘chill’ in response to “pain by a thousand cuts” quote

Politicians from both sides of the Johor Straits have been making themselves…

Royal Elephant Shoots Part II

~ By Kenneth Jeyaretnam ~ Yesterday I wrote about the PAP government’s willingness…

藐视法庭罪成被罚款1.5万元 李绳武讽“三个字花了三年审讯”

因为2017年7月的一则脸书贴文,批评我国政府“好诉讼” (ligitious),法庭制度“温顺” (pliant),李显扬之子李绳武,遭总检察署起诉藐视法庭。 至于高庭法官加南拉美斯今早(29日)裁决,李绳武藐视法庭罪名成立,判罚款1万5000元,或一周监禁。 加南拉美斯称,李绳武的脸书贴文,明显在抨击我国司法制度,按常理应预料到这些贴文会被人转载、引起媒体兴趣。 李绳武今早未出庭。早前李绳武已表示不会再继续参与诉讼。至于政府律师强调法庭与总检察署已告知他聆讯日期。 尽管早前李绳武已说明,有关贴文只是设定为只供朋友圈浏览,不公开大众阅读,却还是引来三大媒体和总检察署的注意,令他对新加坡政府琐事必究的程度感到惊讶。 而政府律师早前指责,李绳武没在贴文里要求脸书朋友不要转发、也不肯揭露自己的脸书朋友圈有多少人,“似乎有隐瞒”;政府律师也指李沉浸于李光耀孙子光环,接受外媒采访,却诋毁祖父守护的司法制度。 李绳武分享爷爷的回忆录 获悉高庭今早的裁决,李绳武也发了一则贴文,分享自己日前整理书架,找到爷爷李光耀多年前赠予他的著作《李光耀回忆录——从第三世界到第一世界:1965到2000》。 “在我大伯欺负弟妹、家庭破裂前,那是较美好的时光”。他表示不同意法庭的判决,也担心这会助长人民行动党打压政治众论的倾向。 “政府浪费了公务员三年的时间,来回应我私人贴文里的三个字。”…