The Consumers Association of Singapore (Case) said that it had received 15 complaints against a furniture company, Artmani Italia Pte Ltd, since 1 January 2016.
Cited from The Straits Times, an associate director of a recruitment agency, Ms Teo bought a $3,000 two-seater leather sofa from the company. She paid it in two instalments, one on July and the other in this early month, arranging the item to be delivered to her flat in Boon Keng in early February. However, the furniture never was delivered.
Around 50 customers, including Ms Teo, gathered together and have lodged police reports. The company owes around $65,000 worth of furniture.
According to ST, when it visited the company’s premises in an industrial building off Hougang yesterday, the firm’s showroom doors were locked.
On the front doors of its another two units listed under the firm’s name, letters from the landlord were pasted. They stated that no one was allowed to access the units unless authorised to do so with effect from 18 January.
People told ST that they saw movers loading furniture from the showroom onto a lorry.
ST states that attempts to reach the company were unsuccessful.
Loy York Jiun, CASE executive director, advised consumers to do their research into a furniture company’s reputation and delivery track record.
He also advised costumers to pay a small deposit instead of the full amount upfront before delivery, and ensure that any negotiations, such as the delivery date, are put down in writing, which would help to minimise their risks when selecting a furniture company, and their losses in the event of business closure.
Though the executive noted that Ms Teo can also file a claim with the Small Claims Tribunal but the majority of those who sought to claim losses from the SCT are more than often disappointed at how the errant merchants can ignore the court orders or fail to have the orders enforced.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

拥100情妇? 贪近18亿元 中国华融前董事长遭判死刑

中国华融资产管理股份有限公司董事长赖小民涉嫌受贿贪污,以及重婚。周二在天津市第二中级人民法院公开宣判,被判处死刑,并没收个人全部财产。 去年八月,赖小民直接或通过特定关系人非法受、索取相关单位和个人给予的财务,共计逾人民币17.88亿元(约3. 65亿新元),写下自1949年以来,最大贪官受贿案。 经审理查明,赖小民于2008年至2018年期间,利用职务便利非法受、索取相关单位和个人给予的财务,共计逾17.88亿元,其中1.04亿元尚未实际取得,属于犯罪未遂。 不仅如此,赖小民与妻子合法婚姻关系存续期间,还与他人长期以夫妻名义共同居住生活,并育有子女。 另一方面,他也在2009年底至2018年1月期间,利用职务的便利,伙同特定关系人侵吞、套取单位公共资金合计逾2千513万元。 对此,法院认为,赖小民受贿犯罪数额巨大,目无法纪、极其贪婪,属于典型不收敛、不收手、顶风作案,且国家和人民利益遭受重大损失,对社会危害极大,罪行极其严重,故依法予以严惩。 据中国媒体报道,媒体曾曝光他用于窝藏赃款赃物的房子,他并承认把该房子称为“超市”;坊间还传言他有“三个100”,即100多套房、100多个关系人、100多个情妇。种种行为都为他的“首贪”纪录添上一抹“传奇”色彩。 不过,赖小民的大学老师和同班同学张陆去年受访时都认为,100多个情妇的说法有所夸张。

购买ofo全新脚车上市 Moov成我国第四活跃脚车共享业者

今年频频有脚车共享业者退出我国市场,那么他们遗留下来的脚车会做和处置呢?送到废铁厂? 自今年4月被取消执照后,中国共享脚车业者ofo的显眼黄色脚车,又会再次出现在我国街道上,不过这次使用不同名字。另外还有一万辆脚车作为“礼物”,被送出国了。 这些被存放在仓库的ofo单车,被初创共享脚车公司Moov Technology购买了,经过翻新后,在上周重新被推出。 该公司于4月份获得“沙盒”执照,可以经营1000辆脚车,因此人们能够在新加坡西部如文礼和先驱看到这些脚车。 自ofo未能满足监管条件而被撤销执照后,Moov是首家进入本地市场的公司。 该中国业者是因未能通过由陆路交通管理局(LTA)添置的新条规,即在指定停放区设置QR码扫描系统,且尽管陆交局多次发出警告,ofo业者仍未能将其脚车车队减少到规定的最大规模,即一万架,才遭当局勒令关闭在新加坡的业务。 环保且响应经济效应 Moov首席执行官Sharon Meng对《海峡时报》说,他们购买了ofo未曾使用的脚车,并将其调整到Moov的系统中,这样不仅环保,也有经济效益。 “今年早些时候,我们了解到有很多全新的脚车,完全没有被使用过,但是因为其他的脚车共享业者退出市场了,而被遗留在仓库中报废。我们相信在改善脚车共享领域中,首先就是要清理战场,并且充分利用全新的脚车。” 除此之外,该公司也宣布在今年年终之前推出自己的脚车,以帮助提高运营效率。…

RM20 VEP charge for all foreign vehicles entering Malaysia from Singapore

Malaysia will be charging RM20 (S$7.55) vehicle entry permit (VEP) for all…

Breaking: AGC files complaint against M Ravi

The Attorney-General’s Chambers (AGC) has filed a complaint against human rights lawyer…