The Consumers Association of Singapore (Case) said that it had received 15 complaints against a furniture company, Artmani Italia Pte Ltd, since 1 January 2016.
Cited from The Straits Times, an associate director of a recruitment agency, Ms Teo bought a $3,000 two-seater leather sofa from the company. She paid it in two instalments, one on July and the other in this early month, arranging the item to be delivered to her flat in Boon Keng in early February. However, the furniture never was delivered.
Around 50 customers, including Ms Teo, gathered together and have lodged police reports. The company owes around $65,000 worth of furniture.
According to ST, when it visited the company’s premises in an industrial building off Hougang yesterday, the firm’s showroom doors were locked.
On the front doors of its another two units listed under the firm’s name, letters from the landlord were pasted. They stated that no one was allowed to access the units unless authorised to do so with effect from 18 January.
People told ST that they saw movers loading furniture from the showroom onto a lorry.
ST states that attempts to reach the company were unsuccessful.
Loy York Jiun, CASE executive director, advised consumers to do their research into a furniture company’s reputation and delivery track record.
He also advised costumers to pay a small deposit instead of the full amount upfront before delivery, and ensure that any negotiations, such as the delivery date, are put down in writing, which would help to minimise their risks when selecting a furniture company, and their losses in the event of business closure.
Though the executive noted that Ms Teo can also file a claim with the Small Claims Tribunal but the majority of those who sought to claim losses from the SCT are more than often disappointed at how the errant merchants can ignore the court orders or fail to have the orders enforced.

Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

New variable capital companies framework introduced to bolster finance industry

On 15 Jan (Wednesday), the Variable Capital Companies (VCC) framework was officially…

Sengkang West celebrates 10th anniversary with carnival and promises of new facilities underway

Sengkang West marked its 10th anniversary this year with a carnival featuring rides,…

Power, change and leadership succession

PAP’s succession mechanism is not necessarily Singapore’s succession mechanism. Ho Rui An

收费站前互殴被判入狱一天 马国男子“不打不相识”变好友

不打不相识,两名男子因为打架被判坐牢一天及罚款1000令吉,出狱时两人已“哥俩好”地合照了。 38岁的华裔男子黄伟鸿(译音,Ng Whye Hong)和30岁的巫裔男子莫哈末法兹林于上周五(9月20日)因超车不果,及不满对方紧跟车后,两人最终在吉隆坡武吉家拉大道收费站打起来,导致两人的手臂、头部和脚部都受伤了。 两名男子随后都到警局报案,但是地方法庭法官表示,“两人在公共场合打架,不丢脸吗?”,判处两人入狱1天及罚款1000元。 莫哈末法兹林于23日晚上,在雪兰莪州加影监狱出狱后,上载了两人的合照,只见两人连带笑容搭肩站在一起。 法治林分享了他们在牢中面对的一切,促使两人开始交谈并互相了解,现在已经成为了好朋友。 他在脸书帖文上指出,“人们常常会因为各种原因导致情绪失控,但是不应该用愤怒、仇恨和嫉妒来荼毒彼此,而遗忘了国家原则、遗失了我们的礼貌和德行”。他也表示两人已之错误中吸取教训,不会重犯,“相信这一切都有上苍的安排,让他和华裔朋友相遇,一起上一课”。