Finance
The most popular retirement planning methods in Singapore
By SingSaver.com.sg
Confused about which retirement planning method is right for you? We break down the pros and cons of the 5 most popular ones in Singapore.
As a leading financial hub, there is no end to the number of retirement plans available in Singapore. However, no single product is suited to everyone, and it can be confusing when you have thousands of options to choose from.
Here, we discuss the five most common retirement planning methods in Singapore, along with their pros and cons:
1. Get an Insurance Policy or Endowment Plan
Insurance policies don’t just provide coverage for accidents and death; many of them also have a savings component. In other words, the insurance policy both provides protection, and also grows your money.
Two common forms of this are endowment insurance, and Investment Linked Policies (ILPs). A qualified financial advisor can give you the exact details of each product (of which there are literally thousands in the market), but we can make a ballpark prediction of the returns.
Most endowment products will project returns of 3% – 5% per annum, while the (riskier) ILPs often project returns of 7% – 9% per annum. However, it’s important to note that these returns are not absolutely guaranteed.
Pros of Using Insurance Policies
The biggest advantage of using an insurance policy for your retirement fund is that it’s ‘hands off’. You just pay your premium every month, and the subsequent investments are managed by the insurer. There is no need to track the market yourself, or make decisions on how your money is invested.
The second advantage of insurance is protection. You do need to be insured for health and accidents, so you are going to buy a policy anyway. You may as well also get money from the policy, rather than just protection.
The third advantage is that, if you’re not a particularly disciplined saver, having a policy paid by GIRO ‘forces’ you to set aside money. We don’t mean this literally (you can cancel a policy or let it lapse), but when you automate the payments you, do not think about it and are not tempted to spend the money.
Cons of Using Insurance Policies
One criticism about insurance policies is that a large chunk of premium payments go toward distribution costs. That is, the money goes toward the agent’s commissions, and toward the marketing and operational costs of the insurer. These costs eat into the returns of the policy, which might otherwise be higher.
As each policy is different, it is impossible for us to tell you exactly how much of the returns are taken up by distribution costs. You will need to know how to work this out yourself by comparing the projected payout to the total premiums paid. This is another problem with insurance: as the product is complex, some people are not financially savvy enough to grasp how much they’re really paying.
(For details on how to calculate this, follow us on Facebook; we have an expert on hand who can explain it in a separate article).
The third problem is that returns from insurance policies depend on how well the insurer fares in the market. If you are part of an ‘unlucky batch’, who held a policy at a time when the insurer hit a rough patch, your projected returns may end up being below the rate of inflation (around 3%).
This can mean a disappointing retirement. If you struggle with personal finance and investing, you can let a Financial Advisor take over for you. However, you do have to be aware that you paying for this privilege: not only are you entrusting someone else with your retirement, you are paying them significant sums via your premiums in order to do so.
2. Use Your CPF Special Account
One way to build a large retirement sum is to transfer your CPF Ordinary Account (CPF OA) funds to your CPF Special Account (CPF SA). The CPF OA grows at up to 3.5% whereas the SA grows at up to 5%.
The CPF OA is low with regard to the general inflation rate. Ideally, a retirement fund should beat Singapore’s core inflation by 2%. This means you want interest of around 5% per annum.
However, the SA gives returns of up to 5% per annum, regardless of market conditions. As such, one strategy is to constantly transfer your OA to your SA, to build a large retirement fund.
Pros of Using Your CPF SA
The main advantage is that CPF SA is guaranteed. Regardless of how well or poorly the market fares, you will get the promised rate.
The second advantage is that your CPF is absolutely secure. Even if you get divorced, for example, your CPF savings remain your own.
Cons of Using Your CPF SA
The most obvious drawback is that you cannot withdraw the CPF money, until you are at least 55 (and still have to leave the minimum sum, S$162,000, for your retirement account).
The second problem is your housing. Because the CPF OA is used to pay for your house, you will have to be prepared to pay in cash instead of via the CPF. This means making the initial down payment, as well as servicing the monthly mortgage, right out of your own bank account.
3. Invest in Property
There are two ways Singaporeans tend to do this. The first is to count on the resale value of their flat. The other way is to purchase a second property, rent it out, and count on a good resale price.
Property investments are popular in Singapore as well as many other Asian cultures; the concept of property ownership carries a sense of prestige and permanence. The general assumption is that there was always be a demand for housing, and less availability of it as the population grows.
Pros of Property Investment
A successful property investment is a cash generating asset. This is when the rental income from the property exceeds the monthly loan repayments – it means the house basically pays for itself, and contributed money to you every month; even better, it could also make you money if it’s resold at a higher price. A successful property investment is closest you will get to free money.
Another advantage of property investment is that, if you choose not to resell, it can be passed to your children (there is no inheritance tax in Singapore). This can give them a big headstart in life, as they will not need to worry about providing housing for themselves.
A property can also be collateral for a loan (a second mortgage, which we will discuss in a future article). Loans backed by property are among the cheapest loans available, as there is already an asset that guarantees the lender will be repaid.
Cons of Property Investment
There is no guarantee that a property can be sold for a profit. The property market, like any other, is prone to fluctuations. In 2016 for example, many properties sold for million dollar losses. As such, property investments are not as ‘risk-free’ as many sellers like to claim.
The other problem with property is that interest rates for home loans can rise, such as they have in 2016 and 2017. This means the monthly repayments can exceed the rental income, and the property will turn into a liability that costs you money.
In the event that a property becomes a liability, it is also an illiquid asset. You cannot just ‘cancel’ your property investment as you can with an insurance policy. It can take many months to sell a house, during which you will be saddled with loan repayments and property taxes.
The final issue with property is the cost. Property investments are capital intensive. A S$1 million condo, for example, requires a minimum down payment of S$50,000 in cash (5% of the total amount borrowed), and another S$150,000 in cash or CPF (15% of the total amount borrowed). You cannot borrow the entire cost of the house from the bank.
4. Invest in Index Funds, Actively Managed Mutual Funds, or Other Equities
Most Singaporeans do not pick stocks on their own, and we strongly advise you not to do so unless you know what you’re doing! Please do not read a few books on stocks and then base your whole retirement plan on what you’ve gleaned.
Most Singaporeans will invest via an index fund or some form of managed fund. In the case of the former, management fees are low, but performance depends on the underlying benchmark. For example, Straits Times Index Funds (ST Index Funds) deliver returns based on the performance of the overall ST Index, which can go up or down.
For actively managed funds, the aim of the fund is often to outperform the market. If the fund uses the ST index as a benchmark, for example, and the ST index delivers returns of six per cent, the fund might deliver returns of 6.2%. If the ST index delivers negative 1.8%, the fund might deliver negative 1.7%.
The idea is that the fund managers, who actively reallocate the assets in the fund, are able to get you better than average returns with your money. However, funds are not managed for free, and you pay for it with a cut of your returns.
Pros of Stock Investment
Stock investments are highly liquid. Even though some funds have rules about when you can sell off your assets, it is generally easy to switch between funds or sell off your assets within a matter of days. This is different from putting your money in the bank or in your CPF, in which you may not be able to withdraw it for a long time.
Stocks have the potential to outperform many other kinds of investment. This is because stocks represent a share in a business, and there is no theoretical limit to how much a business can grow. Many of the early investors in Google, or in Apple when it struggled in the 1990s, became sudden multi-millionaires when these companies took off.
Cons of Stock Investment
Stock investments are risky, as the value of businesses fluctuates all the time. You do run the risk that you will get back less than you invested (capital loss), which could destroy your retirement plan. It’s usually a good idea to invest in something else besides just stocks.
The other problem of stock investments is knowledge. You do need to be able to tell which funds are worth buying into, and also when to leave an underperforming fund. This can be difficult if you have no grasp of the financials involved.
With regard to managed funds, stocks also have the same problem as insurance policies: a large part of your money goes toward paying for the management (with funds, this is expressed as the Total Expense Ratio or TER). Indexed funds, however, have very low management fees, as they only track the market rather than try to beat it.
5. Keep Your Money in Fixed Deposits
This is the slow and painful way: put portions of your monthly pay into fixed deposits, and wait until you retire to spend it. It’s an old school method, which is ‘airtight’ but delivers returns too low to beat inflation.
Fixed deposits pay a certain interest rate (usually below one per cent per annum), and release the money to you at a given time (often five to 10 years). You will be unable to access the money in the meantime, at least not without incurring some form of penalty.
Pros of Fixed Deposits
Fixed deposits are as secure as your money can possible be, next to the CPF. Many people have some money in fixed deposits – speak to a wealth manager about the right amount for you. In general, the older you are the more you would want to leave in fixed deposits (as you get older, your priority is protection rather than growing your wealth).
Fixed deposits are very simple products that anyone can understand. Simply find the bank offering the highest rate for fixed deposits, and give them the money.
Cons of Fixed Deposits
You cannot rely purely on fixed deposits for retirement, especially if you are young (in your 20s). With the exception of private banks for very rich people, or rare promotional offers, the interest rate on a fixed deposit will be below one per cent. This is insufficient to cope with inflation.
The other problem with fixed deposits is inflexibility. You cannot withdraw the money before the deposit matures. If you do, you will often lose all the accumulated interest.
Speak to a financial advisor to find the right portion of your portfolio to put in fixed deposits.
Singsaver.com.sg, Singapore’s go-to personal finance comparison platform, guides consumers on the best money habits with its credit card comparison tool and allows real-time personal loans product comparison.
Finance
CPF Special, MediSave, and Retirement accounts’ interest rate rises to 4.14% for Q4 2024
The Central Provident Fund (CPF) Board and Housing and Development Board (HDB) announced that the interest rate for CPF Special, MediSave, and Retirement accounts will increase to 4.14% in Q4 2024, up from 4.08%. The 4% floor rate will be extended for another year, providing members with stability amid a volatile interest environment, the announcement stated.
SINGAPORE: In a joint announcement on Friday (20 September), the Central Provident Fund (CPF) Board and the Housing and Development Board (HDB) revealed that the interest rate for CPF Special, MediSave, and Retirement accounts will rise to 4.14% for the fourth quarter of 2024, up from 4.08% in the previous quarter.
This increase, effective from October to December, comes as the pegged rate exceeds the established floor rate of 4%.
Finance
US taxation authority to pursue wealthy tax evaders with advanced AI tools
The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) of United States has announced a comprehensive initiative aimed at aggressively pursuing individuals and entities that owe substantial amounts in overdue taxes.
Under the initiative, 1,600 millionaires and 75 large business partnerships are the primary focus of the IRS’s intensified “compliance efforts.”
WASHINGTON, UNITED STATES: The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) announced last Friday (8 Sept), that it is embarking on an ambitious mission to aggressively target 1,600 millionaires and 75 large business partnerships that collectively owe hundreds of millions of dollars in overdue taxes.
IRS Commissioner Daniel Werfel revealed that with increased federal funding and the aid of cutting-edge artificial intelligence tools, the agency is poised to take robust action against affluent individuals who have been accused of evading their tax obligations.
During a call with reporters to provide a preview of the announcement, Commissioner Werfel expressed his frustration at the contrast between individuals who dutifully pay their taxes on time and those wealthy filers who, in his words, have “cut corners” when it comes to fulfilling their tax responsibilities.
“If you pay your taxes on time it should be particularly frustrating when you see that wealthy filers are not,” he said.
The IRS’s latest initiative targets 1,600 millionaires, each of whom owes a minimum of US$250,000 in back taxes, along with 75 large business partnerships boasting average assets of approximately US$10 billion.
These entities are now under the spotlight of the IRS’s renewed “compliance efforts.”
Werfel emphasised that a substantial hiring campaign and the implementation of artificial intelligence research tools, developed both by IRS personnel and contractors, will play pivotal roles in identifying and pursuing wealthy tax evaders.
This proactive approach by the IRS aims to highlight positive outcomes resulting from the increased funding it has received under President Joe Biden’s Democratic administration.
Notably, this move comes amid efforts by Republican members of Congress to reassess and potentially reduce the agency’s funding allocation.
IRS has introduced an extensive programme aimed at revitalisng fairness within the tax system
The IRS announced the groundbreaking move aimed at enhancing tax compliance and fairness, with a particular focus on high-income earners, partnerships, large corporations, and promoters who may be abusing the nation’s tax laws.
This initiative follows the allocation of funding under the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) and a comprehensive review of enforcement strategies.
The new effort, which builds on the groundwork laid following last August’s IRA funding, will place increased attention on individuals with higher incomes and partnerships, both of which have experienced significant drops in audit rates over the past decade.
These changes will be facilitated through the implementation of advanced technology and Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools, empowering IRS compliance teams to more effectively detect tax evasion, identify emerging compliance challenges, and improve the selection of audit cases to prevent unnecessary “no-change” audits that burden taxpayers.
As part of the effort, the IRS will also ensure audit rates do not increase for those earning less than $400,000 a year.
Additionally, the agency will introduce new safeguards to protect those claiming the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC).
The EITC is intended to assist workers with modest incomes, and despite recent years seeing high audit rates for EITC recipients, audit rates for individuals with higher incomes, partnerships, and those with complex tax situations have plummeted.
The IRS will also take measures to prevent unscrupulous tax preparers from exploiting individuals claiming these vital tax credits.
This move underscores the IRS’s commitment to fostering a fair and equitable tax system, ensuring that all taxpayers, regardless of income or complexity, are held to the same standards of compliance and accountability.
The initiative reflects a comprehensive approach to addressing disparities in tax enforcement and strengthening the integrity of the tax system for the benefit of all Americans.
“This new compliance push makes good on the promise of the Inflation Reduction Act to ensure the IRS holds our wealthiest filers accountable to pay the full amount of what they owe.
“The years of underfunding that predated the Inflation Reduction Act led to the lowest audit rate of wealthy filers in our history. I am committed to reversing this trend, making sure that new funding will mean more effective compliance efforts on the wealthy, while middle- and low-income filers will continue to see no change in historically low pre-IRA audit rates for years to come,”
“The nation relies on the IRS to collect funding for every critical government mission, from keeping our skies safe, our food safe and our homeland safe. It’s critical that the agency addresses fundamental gaps in tax compliance that have grown during the last decade,” Werfel said.
Major expansion in high-income/high wealth and partnership compliance work
Prioritisation of high-income cases: Under the High Wealth, High Balance Due Taxpayer Field Initiative, the IRS is intensifying efforts to address taxpayers with total positive income exceeding US$1 million and recognised tax debts of more than US$250,000.
Building on prior successes, which resulted in the collection of US$38 million from over 175 high-income earners, the IRS is allocating additional resources to focus on these high-end collection cases in Fiscal Year 2024.
The agency is proactively reaching out to approximately 1,600 taxpayers in this category who collectively owe substantial sums in taxes.
Expansion of pilot focused on largest partnerships leveraging Artificial Intelligence (AI): Recognising the complexity of tax issues in large partnerships, the IRS is expanding its Large Partnership Compliance (LPC) programme.
Leveraging cutting-edge Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology, the IRS is collaborating with experts in data science and tax enforcement to identify potential compliance risks in partnership tax, general income tax, accounting, and international tax.
By the end of the month, the IRS will initiate examinations of 75 of the largest partnerships in the United States, encompassing diverse industries such as hedge funds, real estate investment partnerships, publicly traded partnerships, large law firms, and more. These partnerships each possess assets exceeding US$10 billion on average.
Greater focus on partnership issues through compliance letters: The IRS has identified ongoing discrepancies in balance sheets within partnerships with assets exceeding US$10 million, indicating potential non-compliance.
Many taxpayers filing partnership returns are reporting discrepancies in the millions of dollars between year-end and year-beginning balances, often without attaching required explanations.
This effort aims to address balance sheet discrepancies swiftly, with an initial mailing of around 500 partnership notices set to begin in early October.
Depending on the response, the IRS will incorporate these cases into the audit process for further examination.
Priority areas for targeted compliance work in FY 2024
The IRS has launched numerous compliance efforts to address serious issues being seen. Some of these, like abusive micro-captive insurance arrangements and syndicated conservation easement abuses, have received extensive public attention. But much more work continues behind the scenes on other issues.
Among some of the additional priority areas the IRS will be focused on that will touch the wealthy evaders include:
Expanded work on digital assets: The IRS is continuing its expansion of efforts related to digital assets, encompassing initiatives such as the John Doe summons and the recent release of proposed broker reporting regulations.
The IRS’s Virtual Currency Compliance Campaign, which aims to ensure compliance with tax obligations related to digital currencies, will persist in the coming months.
An initial review has indicated a potential non-compliance rate of 75% among taxpayers identified through record production from digital currency exchanges.
The IRS anticipates the development of additional digital asset cases for further compliance efforts in early Fiscal Year 2024.
More scrutiny on FBAR violations: High-income taxpayers across various segments have been utilising foreign bank accounts to avoid disclosure and related tax obligations.
US individuals with a financial interest in foreign financial accounts exceeding US$10,000 at any point in the year are required to file a Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts (FBAR).
The IRS’s analysis of multi-year filing patterns has revealed hundreds of potential FBAR non-filers with average account balances exceeding US$1.4 million. In response, the IRS plans to audit the most egregious potential non-filer FBAR cases in Fiscal Year 2024.
Labour brokers: The IRS has identified instances in which construction contractors are making payments to apparent subcontractors via Form 1099-MISC/1099-NEC, yet these subcontractors are, in fact, “shell” companies lacking a legitimate business relationship with the contractor.
Funds paid to these shell companies are routed through Money Service Businesses or accounts associated with the shell company before being returned to the original contractor. This scheme has been observed in states like Texas and Florida.
The IRS is expanding its attention in this area, conducting civil audits and launching criminal investigations to address non-compliance.
This effort is aimed at improving overall compliance, ensuring proper employment tax withholding for vulnerable workers, and creating a fairer playing field for contractors adhering to the rules.
-
Comments1 week ago
Christopher Tan criticizes mrt breakdown following decade-long renewal program
-
Comments4 days ago
Netizens question Ho Ching’s praise for Chee Hong Tat’s return from overseas trip for EWL disruption
-
Current Affairs2 weeks ago
Chee Soon Juan questions Shanmugam’s $88 million property sale amid silence from Mainstream Media
-
Singapore1 week ago
SMRT updates on restoration progress for East-West Line; Power rail completion expected today
-
Singapore1 week ago
Chee Hong Tat: SMRT to replace 30+ rail segments on damaged EWL track with no clear timeline for completion
-
Singapore6 days ago
Lee Hsien Yang pays S$619,335 to Ministers Shanmugam and Balakrishnan in defamation suit to protect family home
-
Singapore6 days ago
Train services between Jurong East and Buona Vista to remain disrupted until 1 Oct due to new cracks on East-West Line
-
Singapore1 week ago
Major breakdown on East-West Line: SMRT faces third service disruption in a month