The UK Financial Times reported yesterday (21 Mar) that Standard Chartered is facing “an investor rebellion” over its CEO’s pay after the bank changed how it calculated his pension in a way that falls foul of UK corporate governance guidelines.

This year, Standard Chartered Bill Winters will receive a pension allowance of £474,000, which is the highest of any chief executive of a large UK-listed bank.

StanChart defended Mr Winters’ high pension allowance saying that it was equivalent to only 20 per cent of his “total salary”.

One big StanChart shareholder rebuked the bank, saying that the change was in “clear contravention” of the corporate governance guidelines, which stipulate that “only basic salary should be pensionable”. For Mr Winters, StanChart decided to use “total salary”, which included a share payment.

Another substantial shareholder remarked, “Shareholders are going to be crawling all over it — it’s not going to slip through. If anything, they have made it worse.”

A top-10 shareholder described what StanChart did for its CEO as “an amazing, daft decision at a time when Standard Chartered has bigger issues”. Shares in the bank have fallen 19 per cent in the past year, underperforming many rivals.

Shareholders are currently pressurizing StanChart to lower its CEO’s pension before a vote on his pay at the company’s annual meeting in May. Apparently, among the public listed banks in UK, StanChart is the only one calculating its chief’s pension as a proportion of total pay rather than the basic cash salary.

Luke Hildyard, executive director of the High Pay Centre, a UK think tank on corporate governance, told Financial Times, “This is a brazen but not very convincing attempt to make the pension award look less excessive than it actually is.”

Meanwhile, shareholders at other UK banks like Lloyds Banking Group, Barclays and Royal Bank of Scotland are also increasingly questioning the high pension payouts of their CEOs.

However, Financial Times reported that StanChart’s biggest shareholder, Temasek, did not seem to be perturbed by the matter.

Financial Times reported, “One person close to Temasek, StanChart’s biggest shareholder, said it did not share other investors’ concerns on pay at the bank.”

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

PSP’s Leong Mun Wai pens lessons that Singaporeans can learn from COVID-19 pandemic

Following the rapid rise of COVID-19 cases in Singapore, Progress Singapore Party’s…

网安局长曾赞扬“称职” 调查总结打脸:职员缺乏素养 “人为疏失本可避免”

新闻评析:独立调查委员会针对去年发生新保集团遭骇事件,呈交400多页的报告,调查结果将此事归咎于人为疏失,指相关资讯科技职员缺乏意识和素养,一些关键人员没有采取有效行动。 根据《联合早报》报导,委员会在报告书中引述负责印证的副总检察长郭民力高级律师: “袭击者鬼祟但不是寂静无声的,网袭还是有迹可循。针对这些迹象,应该采取行动却没有这么做,要么是因为相关职员没意识到袭击正展开,要么是负责职员无动于衷。他们如果采取了适当,袭击者在得逞前就能被制止。” 报告指“虽然我们的网络防御并非坚不可摧,但也不代表我们无法避免被袭击者盗取和渗透数据。” 报告列出五大调查结果: 1)综合保健信息系统公司(IHiS)职员没恰当网袭意识、素养和资源,无法领会他们察觉到的征兆会引起严重保安后果,以及有效应对攻击。 2)一些负责应对IT保安事故的IHiS关键职员,没采取适当、有效或及时行动,造成数据在网袭中被窃或渗透。 3)新保集团的网络和临床信息管理系统,存在数个在网袭前就能补救的漏洞、弱点和错误设置,致使袭击者能成功获取数据。 4)袭击者技术高超、老练,符合“高端持续网络威胁”网袭组织特点。 5)我国网络防御并非坚不可摧,也难以避免高端持续网络威胁袭击,但可避免让袭击者成功获取和渗透数据。 卫生部在去年揭露本地最大的公共医疗机构新保集团遭受历来最大规模网袭,约150万名病人的个人资料被盗,还有约16万人的门诊配药记录被泄露,当中包括总理李显龙与数名部长的记录。 独立调查委员会由前首席地方法官马格纳斯担任主席。…

Vietnamese netizens demand apology for PM Lee’s “untrue and disrespectful” remarks

In his post on Facebook (31 May) expressing his condolences for the…

Singapore confirms the first patient to be co-infected with coronavirus and dengue

Singapore has confirmed the first patient to be co-infected with both the…