The Chinese media reported on Wednesday (20 Mar) that a 4-room HDB flat was allegedly used to house a total of 24 tenants, four times the maximum allowed by HDB.

Presently, 4-room HDB flats can only have a maximum of 6 tenants, with an average of 2 persons to a room.

Reporters went to the unit in block 403 at Pandan Gardens and found that the 4-room flat has 3 double-decker bunk beds crammed into each bedroom, housing at least 18 people in the 3 bedrooms. In one of the bedrooms, 8 people were seen living inside and the living room was also illegally partitioned into two more rooms and rented to two couples, giving a total of 24.

Clothing were seen hanging haphazardly everywhere from the beds and ceiling with barely enough space to move around.

A tenant told a reporter that to avoid getting caught, the landlord imposed strict rules, barring the tenants from answering the door, cooking in the flat, and hanging their clothes out to dry. He said, “We have to always keep the windows tightly shut… At night we try not to turn on the lights.”

The tenants were said to have been mainly introduced through work agents, and the illegal subletting had gone on for about four years.

Another tenant said he did not know who actually owns the flat. Apparently, all matters, including rent, were handled by one tenant who also lived in the same flat.

According to HDB’s website, flat owner who rents their flat out need to ensure that only legal tenants are staying in the flat. The number of tenants also cannot exceed the maximum number allowed. For 1 and 2-room flats, it’s four people while for 3-room and above is six.

Owners must also ensure that their tenants do not further rent out the flat to others. Also, the owners will have to pay a higher property tax.

Other requirements include: The minimum rental period for each tenant must be 6 months per application. The flats cannot be rented out on a short-term basis.

HDB said on its website, “Our flats are meant for homeowners to live in. The terms and conditions help ensure a conducive and harmonious living environment in HDB estates. Singaporean citizens have to meet all the eligibility conditions and obtain our written approval by submitting an online application.”

“We take a very serious view of unauthorised rental and will not hesitate to take action against errant flat owners who flout the rules. Even if you have obtained approval to rent out your flat, you should conduct regular checks to ensure that the rules and regulations are met,” it added.

“We conduct regular checks to take enforcement action against unauthorised rentals. We also carry out targeted investigations on suspected cases of unauthorised rentals when we receive feedback from the public.”

Meanwhile, National Development Minister Lawrence Wong had told Parliament that only 70 illegal subletting cases were dealt with in the 3 years from 2014 to 2016, giving an average of 23 cases a year.

In any case, the alleged illegal subletting at block 403 of Pandan Gardens went unnoticed for 4 long years.

HDB is currently investigating the case.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

失信滥用客户款项 三人接金管局禁令

利用职业行诈骗之事和不诚实行为,两名前银行职员和一名前保险从业员遭新加坡金融管理局(MAS)严禁从事资本市场行业或保险业,长达10至20年之久。 金管局昨日发出有关文告指出,接到禁令的三人分别为前银行职员邓玮玲(译音,Emeline Tang Wei Leng)、前银行职员阮唯明(译音,Nguyen Duy Minh),以及前保险从业员许展龙(译音,Koh Zhan Loong John)。有关的禁令于4月5日起生效。 前汇丰银行(HSBC)职员的邓伟玲以代为存款入定期户口为由,骗取五名客户超过500万元,并提供了伪造文件给这五人,让他们以为有关现款已经汇入户口了。因此他被控滥用超过500万元以及不诚实行为,被金管局禁止20年不可从事资本现场的行业。 阮唯明原为大华银行(UOB)的职员,因为售卖假的金融产品给八名客户,甚至在没通知客户的情况下伪造文件,以他们的名义购买其他的金融产品,并且滥用客户的钱,导致八人蒙受50万元亏损。…

王瑞杰:房产可传给下一代 剩40年屋契组屋仍有价值

财政部长王瑞杰坚称,公共组屋单位在屋主年满85岁后仍有价值,组屋居民绝不是“租户”,他们还可以将房产传给下一代。 根据《今日报》(TodayOnline)指出,王瑞杰强调,25岁的新加坡人购买了新的公共组屋,当屋主达到国人平均寿命,也就是年满85岁时,他的组屋仍然有超过30年屋契。 自2017年3月以来,公共组屋的屋契问题一直都是热门议题。居民发现,他们的组屋单位屋契满99年,屋价归零且可能要还给政府。 在回应博纳产业总裁伊斯迈(Ismail Gafoor)有关这个“非常政治化”的课题时,王瑞杰解释说,公共组屋的居民不仅仅是房客,因为他们仍然可以选择将房产传给他们的孩子。 如同总理李显龙和国家发展部长黄循财,王瑞杰也打保票,声言老龄组屋仍有价值。然而,他并没有进一步详细说明。 在本社去年8月的一篇文章,本地房地产专家提醒国人需改变买房的思维。他认为至今民众仍被灌输“买”组屋成为“屋主”的观念,但实际上那些买下新组屋者,形同是付还了99年份的租金。 降温措施保护本地市场 王瑞杰是出席博纳产业(PropNex)年度大会时,发表以上谈话。博纳产业(PropNex)年度大会谈及了该机构在2018年的业绩,他们成功创造了4.315亿新元的创纪录收入。 伊斯迈总裁表示,能够取得创纪录收入部分原因是因为与前年数字相比,房地产经纪人增加了13巴仙,总数超过7500人。 尽管如此,在政府于2018年7月实施降温措施后,房地产市场已经大幅放缓。 王瑞杰表示,此措施是控制“非常不理性”市场的方式之一,并确保买家不会因为“市场亢奋”(irrational…

接公平竞赛奖得主刘威延律师函 苏睿勇被要求撤“不实”文章

马拉松健将苏睿勇,接到新加坡国家奥林匹克委员会(SNOC)的律师信函,要求他撤回有关2015年东南亚运动会马拉松赛的一篇文章,并且在4月9日下午5时前作出道歉。惟,苏睿勇透过律师回应拒绝了有关要求。 这篇名为“2015 SEA Games Marathon – In My Words (2015东南亚运动会马拉松赛-就我而言)”的文章,是苏睿勇于2015年6月22日(于2018年更新)在其个人部落恪“RunSohFast”发布。这位两届东南亚运动会马拉松金牌得主,在文章中细说他在4年前赢得首个金牌的经过,其中包括在抵达第一个5公里标记后,出现了意想不到的错误U弯。 他在文中是这样写道: “接下来我预计需要回转,我寻找标志、箭头,或是一些告诉我们要回转的标志。我们看到只有一群赛道裁判员集聚在一起,但是没有发现我们已经快速接近了。我们直接越过他们,并且在他们喊着阻止,“走错了!回来!”时,我们才停下。我们转回来,平衡力发生了变化。原本跑在前方带领大家走上错误路线的领队,现在处于后方,然后追回来前方。到目前为止一直处于最后的队友Ashley(刘威延),现在反而跑在我们前端,只因为我们转错了弯。没有人放慢速度等待,比赛依旧进行着。”…