Private carpark operator (Source : secureparking.com.sg)

Private car park operators are discussing whether or not to raise their fees, after the government’s announcement of the increase of car park rates for public car park services that will be effective by the end of the year.

On Thursday (June 30), it was announced that the public car park rates will be raised by 20 per cent. The hike will be effective on December 1, 2016.

There is a great chance that private car park operators such as Wilson Parking, Secure Parking, G Tech and Top Parking will raise their rates in tandem with the upcoming escalation. In 2002, the private car park operators also took the opportunity to raise their car park rates along with the public car park raise.

In the city area, outside of the restricted zone (RZ), parking fee will cost $0,60 per half an hour, up from $0,50. While within the restricted zone, parking fee will cost $1,20 per half an hour, up from $1,00.

This raise will bring the rates between public and private car park in line.

In Ang Mo Kio hub, parking costs $0,65 per half an hour, only $0,05 more than the upcoming public rates. While the private car park rates at Raffles City shopping mall located in the restricted zone costs only $1,10, even cheaper than the upcoming public car park services’ rates.

A source at major carpark operator said to The Straits Time that they would match the escalation because if it is too cheap then the private carpark spaces will be overloaded since they provide better services. Most of their spaces are indoors and motorists do not have to worry about their parking time and being fined.

Another operator source said that they were waiting for the public reaction, “But if the Housing Board goes ahead with the increase, we will just follow the leader.”

HBD and URA announced that they need to raise their rates because the current parking fee cannot recover the increasing costs over the years, such as building expenses, operating and managing costs for car parks.

A spokesman of URA said the aim of the review is to “right price” public car park charges and they need to decrease the gap between the charging fees of public and private car parks. “The last island wide revision of car park charges was done 14 years ago in 2002. Since then, the cost of managing and operating car parks have increased substantially. This is reflected in the current fees charged by most private car parks, which are substantially higher than public car parks,” it said.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Where is the missing subsidiary legislation to POFMA that the Law Minister has mentioned?

As of 25 June, the much debated Protection from Online Falsehoods and…

技术性地操作“反假消息法”

回溯2015年,本社英语站刊载了一则读者来函。这篇文章提出发展“地下城”以应付千万人口增长的隐忧。 不过文章发表不久,本社就收到了总检察署来函,指文章内容含有不实信息,否认内容中提及我国有发展地下城计划,并要求本社撤下该文,否则将采取法律行动。 总检察署指文章作者所言不实,即政府并没有透过筹募储蓄债券,来资助应付千万人口需求的地下城计划。总检察署也遗憾本社发文前,没有事先咨询国家发展部求证。 当时,也是本社第二次受到总检察署援引防止骚扰法令(PFA)对付。第一次是2015年2月,国防部基于本社文章对该部构成骚扰,要求本社撤文。 地下空间容纳地铁、水电设施 总检察署给与本社两个选项,即:撤文,或在文章附注提示,注明以筹募新加坡债券来资助地下城计划的陈述不实,且政府也没有发展应付千万人口、可供作住宅发展的地下城计划。地下空间主要容纳地铁、仓储空间或水电设施,以节约地表空间。 此事一年半后,上诉庭裁决在防止骚扰法令第15条文下,政府不应被视为“个人”,故此援引该法不成立。 来到今年,市区重建局在3月27日公布滨海湾、裕廊创新区和榜鹅数码园区的三维地下空间规划图,最深的部分将在地面下15米。地下设施的规划。在2014年的发展总蓝图还没出现。 市建局3月27日首次公布地下规划 如此看来,本社在2015年刊载的有关地下城文章,并非空穴来风,只不过与地下居住空间没有关系。 政府掌握着事实,但即便如此,仍要指控本社在2015年发表的文章不实,技术性地将该文标签为“假新闻”,即使它离真相只有几步之遥。 前日,律政高级政务部长唐振辉出席管理大学的对话会,有与会者提及,繁琐和高昂诉讼费用,可能令民众对于到法庭去挑战政府发出的“更正事实指示”望而却步。…

年轻求职者要求多? “别怪公司考虑非本地雇员”

冠病19疫情不论是对企业和雇员都带来冲击,如何保障国人生计也成了当前重要议题之一,也迫使行动党政府在选后不得不推出一些措施,来回应民间对就业前景的焦虑。 若注意早前报导,都能感受到国人在疫情下的种种困境,包括大学毕业生投了80份履历还是找不到工;再不然就是怀孕准妈妈被公司裁员等。 然而,亦有本地雇主吐苦水分享,一些年轻求职者提出的要求,包括若周末需工作则要求加班津贴、要求21天年假、希望提供初级助手等等。 FutuReady Asia创办人林子轩在个人贴文指出,他面试了七位年轻求职者,这份工作提供3千以上月薪和14天年假。 他分享的一些个案,包括: 求职者A要求尽可能居家工作,且避免周末上班。林子轩便告知对方一些时候需要周末出动,但可替补休假,对方则要求周末工作的加班津贴,声称法律有规定。 求职者B称办公地点离家太远希望能有些交通补贴;求职者C原本薪资6千元,希望新工作也能支付同等薪资。 求职者D则声称,自己的前公司有初级职员助手,要求林子轩的公司也能提供,林只好表示他们只是中小企业,难以负担。对方便回答“哦,谢谢你的宝贵时间,那我就跳过这次面试。” 求职者E则询问能不能领21天年假;求职者F则希望能领取比3600元更高的薪水。林子轩坦言只能给到3600元,对方则希望能把离职通知缩短至一周,也坦白说只是找工作保生计,仍在寻求更好的机会。 再有求职者G,希望把年度工资补贴(AWS)和1个月可变动花红(VB)都写在雇佣合同里,因为他的前公司也这么做。 林子轩认为,当前面对经济危机和疫情,尽管他相信仍有好工作、也肯定不缺人才,但他形容,年轻专才“似乎缺乏求职欲”(not…

Netizens sceptical over government's request for feedback on upcoming budget

“The Government obviously cannot do everything alone and you’re only as good…