News reports headlines
News reports headlines
News reports headlines

On 17 August, the Singapore Democratic Party video, entitled “Pappy Washing Powder”, was classified a party political film by the Media Development Authority (MDA) and is therefore prohibited under the Films Act.

The MDA, however, has decided not to take further actions against the party as the video is considered the first party political film. The MDA said that as such the parties might not be fully aware of the requirements under the Act.

The MDA reminded the political parties to abide by the Films Act and to ensure that political debate in Singapore is conducted in a responsible and dignified manner, and not by using the film medium to sensationalise serious issues in a biased or emotional manner”.

The Films Act defines any film which is an advertisement made by or on behalf of any political party in Singapore, or any body whose objects relate wholly or mainly to politics in Singapore, or any branch of such party or body; or which is made by any person and directed towards any political end in Singapore.

In May 2014, the youth wing of the PAP, Young PAP, released a video entitled, “Re-ignite the Passion of Servant Leadership”, was cleared by the MDA and given a PG rating.

The MDA said the video “does not fall under the category of political films”.

The Straits Times reported:

“This is because it does not have animation or dramatic elements. The video is also made by a political party and comprises its manifesto and ideology, on the basis of which the party’s candidates will seek to be elected.”

The video seems to have been made private since then, after it drew widespread ridicule for being “robotic”. (A copy of it has been uploaded online by another Facebook page, and a parody of it emerged soon after. Please see below.)

On Monday, the MDA classified the SDP video as a party political film.

Can you tell why one is classified as such while the other is not?

The Young PAP video (from another Facebook page) – “Re-ignite the Passion of Servant Leadership”:

Parody of the PAP’s “Re-ignite the Passion of Servant Leadership”:

SDP’s “Pappy Washing Powder”:

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

The global movement to kill the death penalty

The following article written on 27 March 2011 is republished here with…

An alternative perspective of the second WP rally

By Texas Hong – I was at WP's second rally of this Hougang by-election.…

New NDP song by Dick Lee, “Our Singapore”

The new song for this year’s National Day Parade is “Our Singapore”,…

郭俨进泵井溺毙案:一级准尉法立被判13个月监禁

民防服役人员郭俨进中士被推入泵井溺毙一案,一级准尉法立(Mohamed Farid Mohd Saleh)犯下教唆他人做出鲁莽行为导致他人重伤罪名成立,昨天(20日)下午被判13个月监禁。 法立去年5月13日涉嫌指示将即将退役的郭俨进推入12米的泵井,导致溺毙身亡。同案被告亦包括将郭俨进推入死亡泵井的努尔法特瓦(Fatwa),法瓦特在日前已承认罪行,并接受年4星期监禁,目前正在服刑中。 控方对此表示,被告作为现场最高级别的民防人员,不仅没有履行保护安危的义务和责任,反而唆使法瓦特将过眼睛郭俨进推入泵井。 “法瓦是在被告的唆使下采取行动,因此,被告应与法瓦受到相对的惩处。在本案中不应有任何的差别对待”,控方表示。 控方指出,鉴于被告在第一时间不如法瓦一样,一开始就认罪,明显缺乏悔意,因此将刑法提高到至少14个月以上。 然而,被告的律师则争取四至八个月的刑法,他表明,尽管法立有作出指示,却没料掉法瓦特会以偷袭的方式将郭俨进推入其中,而且事后法立也相当后悔。 地方法官则表示,刑法本身必须反映本案所造成的伤害,与所应当的罪责,欲透过此案向公众传达鲁莽与冒险的行为是不能容忍,必须准备承担相关法律罪责,最重要是向军警人员传达类似陋习应杜绝的信息。 另外,法官也同意控方立场,认为被告已在民防部队服务长达11年,是清楚“整人”活动应被禁止,并了解泵井的深度和黑暗,却依然唆使将郭俨进推入泵井,因此刑罚也起到阻摄作用。 除了法特瓦与法立,另名被告阿迪哈扎里(Adighazali…